在初级卫生机构使用临床决策支持算法咨询患病儿童的障碍和推动因素:来自印度北方邦的一项定性研究

IF 2.3 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Mansi Tyagi , Divas Kumar , Kovid Sharma , Fenella Beynon , Gaurav Kumar , Hélène Langet , Gillian A. Levine , Michael A. Ruffo , Mira Emmanuel Fabula , Valérie D'Acremont , Kaspar Wyss , Leah F. Bohle , Shally Awasthi
{"title":"在初级卫生机构使用临床决策支持算法咨询患病儿童的障碍和推动因素:来自印度北方邦的一项定性研究","authors":"Mansi Tyagi ,&nbsp;Divas Kumar ,&nbsp;Kovid Sharma ,&nbsp;Fenella Beynon ,&nbsp;Gaurav Kumar ,&nbsp;Hélène Langet ,&nbsp;Gillian A. Levine ,&nbsp;Michael A. Ruffo ,&nbsp;Mira Emmanuel Fabula ,&nbsp;Valérie D'Acremont ,&nbsp;Kaspar Wyss ,&nbsp;Leah F. Bohle ,&nbsp;Shally Awasthi","doi":"10.1016/j.cegh.2025.102038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>In Indian public health system, adherence to Integrated Management of Childhood Illness (IMNCI) guidelines is low due to inadequate capacity building, high workload and shortage of healthcare providers (HCPs). Objective was to explore barriers and enablers experienced by HCPs using a digital clinical decision support algorithm (CDSA) for consultation of sick under-five children at primary healthcare facilities in Uttar Pradesh, India.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>From nine facilities, ten HCPs were trained on IMNCI guidelines and CDSA use. In-depth interviews (IDIs) of HCPs were conducted at three weeks (early phase) and five months (late phase), after intervention initiation.</div></div><div><h3>Result</h3><div>From July-to-December 2022, nine IDIs were conducted in early and eight in late phase. One HCP was paediatrician, five were trained in modern medicine and remaining in Indian traditional medicine systems. Their median clinical experience was 11 years. High patient load, HCP's shortage, multiple responsibilities and lack of supervisory support were identified as facility related barriers to CDSA implementation. Additionally, software glitches, substantial time requirements to complete consultation with CDSA and manual data entry were identified as device-related barriers. Low patient load, perceived value of CDSA by HCPs and ability of CDSA to work offline were identified as enablers. From early to late phase, no strong differences were identified on views about CDSA, with some of the barriers however being stronger.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>CDSA can enhance access to evidence-based guidelines and improve awareness of assessment and management, as highlighted by HCPs. To fully realize these benefits, system challenges and technological barriers must be addressed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46404,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health","volume":"34 ","pages":"Article 102038"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Barriers and enablers of using a clinical decision support algorithm to consult sick children at primary health facilities: A qualitative study from Uttar Pradesh, India\",\"authors\":\"Mansi Tyagi ,&nbsp;Divas Kumar ,&nbsp;Kovid Sharma ,&nbsp;Fenella Beynon ,&nbsp;Gaurav Kumar ,&nbsp;Hélène Langet ,&nbsp;Gillian A. Levine ,&nbsp;Michael A. Ruffo ,&nbsp;Mira Emmanuel Fabula ,&nbsp;Valérie D'Acremont ,&nbsp;Kaspar Wyss ,&nbsp;Leah F. Bohle ,&nbsp;Shally Awasthi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cegh.2025.102038\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>In Indian public health system, adherence to Integrated Management of Childhood Illness (IMNCI) guidelines is low due to inadequate capacity building, high workload and shortage of healthcare providers (HCPs). Objective was to explore barriers and enablers experienced by HCPs using a digital clinical decision support algorithm (CDSA) for consultation of sick under-five children at primary healthcare facilities in Uttar Pradesh, India.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>From nine facilities, ten HCPs were trained on IMNCI guidelines and CDSA use. In-depth interviews (IDIs) of HCPs were conducted at three weeks (early phase) and five months (late phase), after intervention initiation.</div></div><div><h3>Result</h3><div>From July-to-December 2022, nine IDIs were conducted in early and eight in late phase. One HCP was paediatrician, five were trained in modern medicine and remaining in Indian traditional medicine systems. Their median clinical experience was 11 years. High patient load, HCP's shortage, multiple responsibilities and lack of supervisory support were identified as facility related barriers to CDSA implementation. Additionally, software glitches, substantial time requirements to complete consultation with CDSA and manual data entry were identified as device-related barriers. Low patient load, perceived value of CDSA by HCPs and ability of CDSA to work offline were identified as enablers. From early to late phase, no strong differences were identified on views about CDSA, with some of the barriers however being stronger.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>CDSA can enhance access to evidence-based guidelines and improve awareness of assessment and management, as highlighted by HCPs. To fully realize these benefits, system challenges and technological barriers must be addressed.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46404,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health\",\"volume\":\"34 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102038\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213398425001277\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213398425001277","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在印度的公共卫生系统中,由于能力建设不足、工作量大和卫生保健提供者(HCPs)短缺,对儿童疾病综合管理(IMNCI)指南的依从性很低。目的是探讨在印度北方邦的初级卫生保健机构中,HCPs使用数字临床决策支持算法(CDSA)对患病的五岁以下儿童进行咨询时遇到的障碍和促进因素。方法对来自9家医院的10名医护人员进行IMNCI指南和CDSA使用培训。在干预开始后的3周(早期阶段)和5个月(后期阶段)对HCPs进行了深度访谈(IDIs)。结果2022年7 - 12月,共开展了前期9例、后期8例idi。一名HCP是儿科医生,五名HCP接受过现代医学培训,并留在印度传统医学系统。他们的平均临床经验为11年。高患者负荷、HCP短缺、多重职责和缺乏监督支持被确定为CDSA实施的设施相关障碍。此外,软件故障、完成CDSA咨询所需的大量时间和手动数据输入被认为是与设备相关的障碍。低患者负荷、HCPs对CDSA的感知价值和CDSA离线工作的能力被认为是促进因素。从早期到后期,对CDSA的看法没有明显的差异,但有些障碍更强。结论cdsa可以提高循证指南的可及性,提高对评估和管理的认识,这是HCPs所强调的。为了充分实现这些好处,必须解决系统挑战和技术障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Barriers and enablers of using a clinical decision support algorithm to consult sick children at primary health facilities: A qualitative study from Uttar Pradesh, India

Introduction

In Indian public health system, adherence to Integrated Management of Childhood Illness (IMNCI) guidelines is low due to inadequate capacity building, high workload and shortage of healthcare providers (HCPs). Objective was to explore barriers and enablers experienced by HCPs using a digital clinical decision support algorithm (CDSA) for consultation of sick under-five children at primary healthcare facilities in Uttar Pradesh, India.

Method

From nine facilities, ten HCPs were trained on IMNCI guidelines and CDSA use. In-depth interviews (IDIs) of HCPs were conducted at three weeks (early phase) and five months (late phase), after intervention initiation.

Result

From July-to-December 2022, nine IDIs were conducted in early and eight in late phase. One HCP was paediatrician, five were trained in modern medicine and remaining in Indian traditional medicine systems. Their median clinical experience was 11 years. High patient load, HCP's shortage, multiple responsibilities and lack of supervisory support were identified as facility related barriers to CDSA implementation. Additionally, software glitches, substantial time requirements to complete consultation with CDSA and manual data entry were identified as device-related barriers. Low patient load, perceived value of CDSA by HCPs and ability of CDSA to work offline were identified as enablers. From early to late phase, no strong differences were identified on views about CDSA, with some of the barriers however being stronger.

Conclusion

CDSA can enhance access to evidence-based guidelines and improve awareness of assessment and management, as highlighted by HCPs. To fully realize these benefits, system challenges and technological barriers must be addressed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health
Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
218
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health (CEGH) is a multidisciplinary journal and it is published four times (March, June, September, December) a year. The mandate of CEGH is to promote articles on clinical epidemiology with focus on developing countries in the context of global health. We also accept articles from other countries. It publishes original research work across all disciplines of medicine and allied sciences, related to clinical epidemiology and global health. The journal publishes Original articles, Review articles, Evidence Summaries, Letters to the Editor. All articles published in CEGH are peer-reviewed and published online for immediate access and citation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信