{"title":"考虑到元宇宙技术,什么时候应该选择内部或外部主播进行直播?","authors":"Shunan Guo , Xiaoping Xu , T.C.E. Cheng , Ping He","doi":"10.1016/j.tre.2025.104174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The emergence of live-streaming channels has changed the traditional online channels though, and has opened up opportunities for manufacturers. We consider a manufacturer cooperating with an online platform operating with two selling channels: live-streaming and agency channels. The manufacturer can choose an internal or external anchor to introduce its products in the live-streaming channel. The external anchor charges a commission whereas the internal anchor does not. In addition, we incorporate three features of the live-streaming channel, namely “encroaching effect”, “long-term effect”, and “live-interaction efficiency”. We reveal that no matter whether to adopt metaverse technology, inviting an external anchor brings the manufacturer more (less) profit than deploying an internal anchor at a low (high) live-interaction efficiency. However, inviting the external anchor first brings the platform lower, then higher, and finally lower profit than deploying the internal anchor as the long-term effect increases. In addition, no matter which anchor is deployed, adopting metaverse technology brings the manufacturer lower (higher) profit than that without metaverse technology at a low (high) live-interaction efficiency. However, adopting metaverse technology brings the platform more (less) profit than that without metaverse technology at a low (high) unit metaverse-enabled benefit.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49418,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part E-Logistics and Transportation Review","volume":"200 ","pages":"Article 104174"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"When should the internal or external anchor be selected to conduct live-streaming considering metaverse technology?\",\"authors\":\"Shunan Guo , Xiaoping Xu , T.C.E. Cheng , Ping He\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tre.2025.104174\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The emergence of live-streaming channels has changed the traditional online channels though, and has opened up opportunities for manufacturers. We consider a manufacturer cooperating with an online platform operating with two selling channels: live-streaming and agency channels. The manufacturer can choose an internal or external anchor to introduce its products in the live-streaming channel. The external anchor charges a commission whereas the internal anchor does not. In addition, we incorporate three features of the live-streaming channel, namely “encroaching effect”, “long-term effect”, and “live-interaction efficiency”. We reveal that no matter whether to adopt metaverse technology, inviting an external anchor brings the manufacturer more (less) profit than deploying an internal anchor at a low (high) live-interaction efficiency. However, inviting the external anchor first brings the platform lower, then higher, and finally lower profit than deploying the internal anchor as the long-term effect increases. In addition, no matter which anchor is deployed, adopting metaverse technology brings the manufacturer lower (higher) profit than that without metaverse technology at a low (high) live-interaction efficiency. However, adopting metaverse technology brings the platform more (less) profit than that without metaverse technology at a low (high) unit metaverse-enabled benefit.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49418,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportation Research Part E-Logistics and Transportation Review\",\"volume\":\"200 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104174\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportation Research Part E-Logistics and Transportation Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1366554525002157\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part E-Logistics and Transportation Review","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1366554525002157","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
When should the internal or external anchor be selected to conduct live-streaming considering metaverse technology?
The emergence of live-streaming channels has changed the traditional online channels though, and has opened up opportunities for manufacturers. We consider a manufacturer cooperating with an online platform operating with two selling channels: live-streaming and agency channels. The manufacturer can choose an internal or external anchor to introduce its products in the live-streaming channel. The external anchor charges a commission whereas the internal anchor does not. In addition, we incorporate three features of the live-streaming channel, namely “encroaching effect”, “long-term effect”, and “live-interaction efficiency”. We reveal that no matter whether to adopt metaverse technology, inviting an external anchor brings the manufacturer more (less) profit than deploying an internal anchor at a low (high) live-interaction efficiency. However, inviting the external anchor first brings the platform lower, then higher, and finally lower profit than deploying the internal anchor as the long-term effect increases. In addition, no matter which anchor is deployed, adopting metaverse technology brings the manufacturer lower (higher) profit than that without metaverse technology at a low (high) live-interaction efficiency. However, adopting metaverse technology brings the platform more (less) profit than that without metaverse technology at a low (high) unit metaverse-enabled benefit.
期刊介绍:
Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review is a reputable journal that publishes high-quality articles covering a wide range of topics in the field of logistics and transportation research. The journal welcomes submissions on various subjects, including transport economics, transport infrastructure and investment appraisal, evaluation of public policies related to transportation, empirical and analytical studies of logistics management practices and performance, logistics and operations models, and logistics and supply chain management.
Part E aims to provide informative and well-researched articles that contribute to the understanding and advancement of the field. The content of the journal is complementary to other prestigious journals in transportation research, such as Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Part B: Methodological, Part C: Emerging Technologies, Part D: Transport and Environment, and Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. Together, these journals form a comprehensive and cohesive reference for current research in transportation science.