评价从废钕铁硼磁体中回收稀土元素的上游加工策略:比较技术经济和环境分析

IF 7.3 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Seyedmehdi Sharifian, Sheida Nili and Ehsan Vahidi*, 
{"title":"评价从废钕铁硼磁体中回收稀土元素的上游加工策略:比较技术经济和环境分析","authors":"Seyedmehdi Sharifian,&nbsp;Sheida Nili and Ehsan Vahidi*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acssuschemeng.5c0134210.1021/acssuschemeng.5c01342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >The production of rare earth elements (REEs) from secondary resources such as permanent magnets is an excellent advancement of a circular economy. This study evaluates four upstream processing approaches, each addressing REE extraction and impurity removal through physical and chemical methods. A comparative study of technoeconomic analysis and life cycle assessment reveals substantial differences in both economic and environmental impacts. The hydrogen decrepitation-associated process is the least favorable due to its high electricity consumption, resulting in the highest environmental footprint and operational costs. In contrast, the hydrothermal process emerges as the most sustainable and cost-effective option, exhibiting the lowest greenhouse gas emissions (8.8 kg CO<sub>2</sub>-eq per kg REE salt), the shortest payback period (0.8 years), and the highest return on investment (187.1%). The cash flow analysis over the plant’s lifetime confirms that, in the best-case scenario, achieving a net positive cash flow of $41 million is possible over 13 years. These results are valuable insights for upstream approaches prior to industrialization.</p>","PeriodicalId":25,"journal":{"name":"ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering","volume":"13 19","pages":"7134–7142 7134–7142"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating Upstream Processing Strategies for Rare Earth Element Recovery from NdFeB Waste Magnets: A Comparative Technoeconomic and Environmental Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Seyedmehdi Sharifian,&nbsp;Sheida Nili and Ehsan Vahidi*,&nbsp;\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acssuschemeng.5c0134210.1021/acssuschemeng.5c01342\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >The production of rare earth elements (REEs) from secondary resources such as permanent magnets is an excellent advancement of a circular economy. This study evaluates four upstream processing approaches, each addressing REE extraction and impurity removal through physical and chemical methods. A comparative study of technoeconomic analysis and life cycle assessment reveals substantial differences in both economic and environmental impacts. The hydrogen decrepitation-associated process is the least favorable due to its high electricity consumption, resulting in the highest environmental footprint and operational costs. In contrast, the hydrothermal process emerges as the most sustainable and cost-effective option, exhibiting the lowest greenhouse gas emissions (8.8 kg CO<sub>2</sub>-eq per kg REE salt), the shortest payback period (0.8 years), and the highest return on investment (187.1%). The cash flow analysis over the plant’s lifetime confirms that, in the best-case scenario, achieving a net positive cash flow of $41 million is possible over 13 years. These results are valuable insights for upstream approaches prior to industrialization.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":25,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering\",\"volume\":\"13 19\",\"pages\":\"7134–7142 7134–7142\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acssuschemeng.5c01342\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acssuschemeng.5c01342","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

从二次资源(如永磁体)中生产稀土元素是循环经济的一个极好的进步。本研究评估了四种上游处理方法,每种方法都通过物理和化学方法解决稀土提取和杂质去除问题。技术经济分析和生命周期评价的比较研究揭示了经济和环境影响的实质性差异。氢分解相关工艺是最不利的,因为它的高电力消耗,导致最高的环境足迹和运营成本。相比之下,水热法是最具可持续性和成本效益的选择,其温室气体排放量最低(每千克稀土盐8.8千克二氧化碳当量),投资回收期最短(0.8年),投资回报率最高(187.1%)。工厂生命周期的现金流分析证实,在最好的情况下,在13年内实现4100万美元的净正现金流是可能的。这些结果对工业化之前的上游方法有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Evaluating Upstream Processing Strategies for Rare Earth Element Recovery from NdFeB Waste Magnets: A Comparative Technoeconomic and Environmental Analysis

Evaluating Upstream Processing Strategies for Rare Earth Element Recovery from NdFeB Waste Magnets: A Comparative Technoeconomic and Environmental Analysis

The production of rare earth elements (REEs) from secondary resources such as permanent magnets is an excellent advancement of a circular economy. This study evaluates four upstream processing approaches, each addressing REE extraction and impurity removal through physical and chemical methods. A comparative study of technoeconomic analysis and life cycle assessment reveals substantial differences in both economic and environmental impacts. The hydrogen decrepitation-associated process is the least favorable due to its high electricity consumption, resulting in the highest environmental footprint and operational costs. In contrast, the hydrothermal process emerges as the most sustainable and cost-effective option, exhibiting the lowest greenhouse gas emissions (8.8 kg CO2-eq per kg REE salt), the shortest payback period (0.8 years), and the highest return on investment (187.1%). The cash flow analysis over the plant’s lifetime confirms that, in the best-case scenario, achieving a net positive cash flow of $41 million is possible over 13 years. These results are valuable insights for upstream approaches prior to industrialization.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering
ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
4.80%
发文量
1470
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering is a prestigious weekly peer-reviewed scientific journal published by the American Chemical Society. Dedicated to advancing the principles of green chemistry and green engineering, it covers a wide array of research topics including green chemistry, green engineering, biomass, alternative energy, and life cycle assessment. The journal welcomes submissions in various formats, including Letters, Articles, Features, and Perspectives (Reviews), that address the challenges of sustainability in the chemical enterprise and contribute to the advancement of sustainable practices. Join us in shaping the future of sustainable chemistry and engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信