处理有关生物剂量学在应对重大核事件中的作用的主要问题:EPR生物剂量2024圆桌讨论报告。

Matthias Port, Donovan Anderson, Harold M Swartz, Valerie Swee Ting Goh, Merriline M Satyamitra, Naduparambil K Jacob, Mattia Romeo, Ruth Wilkins, Ann Barry Flood
{"title":"处理有关生物剂量学在应对重大核事件中的作用的主要问题:EPR生物剂量2024圆桌讨论报告。","authors":"Matthias Port, Donovan Anderson, Harold M Swartz, Valerie Swee Ting Goh, Merriline M Satyamitra, Naduparambil K Jacob, Mattia Romeo, Ruth Wilkins, Ann Barry Flood","doi":"10.1080/09553002.2025.2498978","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The roundtable discussion at EPR BioDose 2024 focused on identifying challenges for using biodosimetry in a large nuclear incident and exploring potential solutions to strengthen preparedness and response frameworks. This report outlines the major themes discussed, including advancements in techniques, challenges in scaling operations, and the future of biodosimetry in emergency response. Initiated by International Association of Biological and EPR Radiation Dosimetry (IABERD), a group of experts comprised of professionals in academia, government and other agencies, were asked to discuss the question: 'When and how should biodosimetry be used for an unplanned radiation explosion in the short or long term?' This question challenged participants to consider a range of scenarios, from immediate triage in the aftermath of an incident to long-term health monitoring and risk assessment. Panelists acknowledged that, while biodosimetry plays a crucial role in rapidly assessing exposure levels to guide medical response, its practical implementation can vary based on scale, resources, and timing. They emphasized that in the short term, methods that provide quick, large-scale screening are important, whereas long-term strategies might include more detailed biological assessments to understand cumulative effects and potential health risks. Despite the difficulty of a one-size-fits-all approach, the insights gathered aimed to inform strategies that balance speed, accuracy, and sustainability in biodosimetry practices. Finally, panelists emphasized the need for better communication about preparedness with the general public and healthcare providers, and a more collaborative approach that also takes into account evaluating the practicality of various methods for triage or guiding treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":94057,"journal":{"name":"International journal of radiation biology","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Addressing major issues regarding the roles of biodosimetry in responding to a major nuclear incident: report of EPR BioDose 2024 roundtable discussion.\",\"authors\":\"Matthias Port, Donovan Anderson, Harold M Swartz, Valerie Swee Ting Goh, Merriline M Satyamitra, Naduparambil K Jacob, Mattia Romeo, Ruth Wilkins, Ann Barry Flood\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09553002.2025.2498978\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The roundtable discussion at EPR BioDose 2024 focused on identifying challenges for using biodosimetry in a large nuclear incident and exploring potential solutions to strengthen preparedness and response frameworks. This report outlines the major themes discussed, including advancements in techniques, challenges in scaling operations, and the future of biodosimetry in emergency response. Initiated by International Association of Biological and EPR Radiation Dosimetry (IABERD), a group of experts comprised of professionals in academia, government and other agencies, were asked to discuss the question: 'When and how should biodosimetry be used for an unplanned radiation explosion in the short or long term?' This question challenged participants to consider a range of scenarios, from immediate triage in the aftermath of an incident to long-term health monitoring and risk assessment. Panelists acknowledged that, while biodosimetry plays a crucial role in rapidly assessing exposure levels to guide medical response, its practical implementation can vary based on scale, resources, and timing. They emphasized that in the short term, methods that provide quick, large-scale screening are important, whereas long-term strategies might include more detailed biological assessments to understand cumulative effects and potential health risks. Despite the difficulty of a one-size-fits-all approach, the insights gathered aimed to inform strategies that balance speed, accuracy, and sustainability in biodosimetry practices. Finally, panelists emphasized the need for better communication about preparedness with the general public and healthcare providers, and a more collaborative approach that also takes into account evaluating the practicality of various methods for triage or guiding treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94057,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of radiation biology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of radiation biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09553002.2025.2498978\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of radiation biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09553002.2025.2498978","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

EPR生物剂量2024圆桌会议的讨论重点是确定在大型核事件中使用生物剂量学的挑战,并探索加强准备和应对框架的潜在解决方案。本报告概述了讨论的主要主题,包括技术的进步、规模操作的挑战以及生物剂量测定在应急响应中的未来。由国际生物和EPR辐射剂量学协会(IABERD)发起,由学术界、政府和其他机构的专业人士组成的一组专家被要求讨论以下问题:“在短期或长期内,生物剂量学应该在何时以及如何用于计划外的辐射爆炸?”这个问题要求参与者考虑一系列情景,从事件发生后的立即分类到长期健康监测和风险评估。小组成员承认,虽然生物剂量测定法在快速评估暴露水平以指导医疗反应方面发挥着至关重要的作用,但其实际实施可能因规模、资源和时间而异。他们强调,在短期内,提供快速、大规模筛查的方法很重要,而长期战略可能包括更详细的生物学评估,以了解累积效应和潜在的健康风险。尽管采用一刀切的方法存在困难,但所收集的见解旨在为生物剂量测定实践中平衡速度、准确性和可持续性的策略提供信息。最后,小组成员强调,需要与公众和医疗保健提供者就备灾工作进行更好的沟通,并采取更加协作的办法,同时考虑到评估各种分诊方法或指导治疗方法的实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Addressing major issues regarding the roles of biodosimetry in responding to a major nuclear incident: report of EPR BioDose 2024 roundtable discussion.

The roundtable discussion at EPR BioDose 2024 focused on identifying challenges for using biodosimetry in a large nuclear incident and exploring potential solutions to strengthen preparedness and response frameworks. This report outlines the major themes discussed, including advancements in techniques, challenges in scaling operations, and the future of biodosimetry in emergency response. Initiated by International Association of Biological and EPR Radiation Dosimetry (IABERD), a group of experts comprised of professionals in academia, government and other agencies, were asked to discuss the question: 'When and how should biodosimetry be used for an unplanned radiation explosion in the short or long term?' This question challenged participants to consider a range of scenarios, from immediate triage in the aftermath of an incident to long-term health monitoring and risk assessment. Panelists acknowledged that, while biodosimetry plays a crucial role in rapidly assessing exposure levels to guide medical response, its practical implementation can vary based on scale, resources, and timing. They emphasized that in the short term, methods that provide quick, large-scale screening are important, whereas long-term strategies might include more detailed biological assessments to understand cumulative effects and potential health risks. Despite the difficulty of a one-size-fits-all approach, the insights gathered aimed to inform strategies that balance speed, accuracy, and sustainability in biodosimetry practices. Finally, panelists emphasized the need for better communication about preparedness with the general public and healthcare providers, and a more collaborative approach that also takes into account evaluating the practicality of various methods for triage or guiding treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信