Pugazhenthan Thangaraju, Ripudaman Arora, Nitin M Nagarkar, Pankaj Kumar Kannauje, Rupa Mehta, Hemasri Velmurugan, Muthathal Subramanian
{"title":"三级保健教学医院在大流行灾难时单独使用任何形式的两性霉素B或与泊沙康唑联合使用COVID-19相关毛霉菌病(CAM)","authors":"Pugazhenthan Thangaraju, Ripudaman Arora, Nitin M Nagarkar, Pankaj Kumar Kannauje, Rupa Mehta, Hemasri Velmurugan, Muthathal Subramanian","doi":"10.2174/0127724344355666250513101536","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The recent COVID-19 wave showed a significant rise in mucormycosis, changing its prevalence, particularly in India. Sadly, the total risk of mortality due to COVID-19 associated mucormycosis (CAM) remains high. It may be better to introduce a combination of drugs rather than unacceptable poor outcomes with Amphotericin B monotherapy.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this study is to assess the proportion of mucormycosis patient's clinical outcomes with antifungal agent (Amphotericin B of any forms alone) or combination drug therapy (Amphotericin B of any form and Posaconazole).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>It was a retrospective cohort study conducted between April 1st, 2021 and July 31st, 2021 at the tertiary care teaching hospital All India Institutes of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Raipur.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 271 medical records of CAM patients, 211 records were included in the study. Among them, 46 patients (21.8%) received group 1 treatment i.e. Amphotericin only and 165 patients (78.2%) received group 2 treatment, i.e. Amphotericin B with Posaconazole. Group 2 was associated with a longer time to event, having a higher survival rate. The Hazard Ratio (HR) was 0.22 (95% CI - 0.13-0.36, p-value 0.000).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings will support the need for future studies to determine the efficacy of AMB and posaconazole combination therapy in the treatment of mucormycosis and to produce an evidence-based standard treatment regimen.</p>","PeriodicalId":74643,"journal":{"name":"Recent advances in anti-infective drug discovery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of any form of Amphotericin B Alone or with Posaconazole in COVID-19 Associated Mucormycosis (CAM) at the Time of Pandemic Disaster in a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital.\",\"authors\":\"Pugazhenthan Thangaraju, Ripudaman Arora, Nitin M Nagarkar, Pankaj Kumar Kannauje, Rupa Mehta, Hemasri Velmurugan, Muthathal Subramanian\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/0127724344355666250513101536\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The recent COVID-19 wave showed a significant rise in mucormycosis, changing its prevalence, particularly in India. Sadly, the total risk of mortality due to COVID-19 associated mucormycosis (CAM) remains high. It may be better to introduce a combination of drugs rather than unacceptable poor outcomes with Amphotericin B monotherapy.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this study is to assess the proportion of mucormycosis patient's clinical outcomes with antifungal agent (Amphotericin B of any forms alone) or combination drug therapy (Amphotericin B of any form and Posaconazole).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>It was a retrospective cohort study conducted between April 1st, 2021 and July 31st, 2021 at the tertiary care teaching hospital All India Institutes of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Raipur.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 271 medical records of CAM patients, 211 records were included in the study. Among them, 46 patients (21.8%) received group 1 treatment i.e. Amphotericin only and 165 patients (78.2%) received group 2 treatment, i.e. Amphotericin B with Posaconazole. Group 2 was associated with a longer time to event, having a higher survival rate. The Hazard Ratio (HR) was 0.22 (95% CI - 0.13-0.36, p-value 0.000).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings will support the need for future studies to determine the efficacy of AMB and posaconazole combination therapy in the treatment of mucormycosis and to produce an evidence-based standard treatment regimen.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74643,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Recent advances in anti-infective drug discovery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Recent advances in anti-infective drug discovery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/0127724344355666250513101536\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Recent advances in anti-infective drug discovery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0127724344355666250513101536","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:最近的COVID-19浪潮显示毛霉病显著上升,改变了其流行情况,特别是在印度。遗憾的是,与COVID-19相关的毛霉病(CAM)造成的总死亡风险仍然很高。引入联合用药可能比单药两性霉素B治疗产生不可接受的不良后果要好。目的:本研究的目的是评估毛霉病患者使用抗真菌药物(任何形式的两性霉素B)或联合药物治疗(任何形式的两性霉素B和泊沙康唑)的临床结果比例。方法:回顾性队列研究于2021年4月1日至2021年7月31日在Raipur全印度医学科学研究所(AIIMS)三级保健教学医院进行。结果:271例CAM患者病历中,211例纳入研究。其中,46例(21.8%)患者接受单用两性霉素治疗,165例(78.2%)患者接受双用两性霉素B联合泊沙康唑治疗。第二组发生事件的时间较长,生存率较高。风险比(HR)为0.22 (95% CI - 0.13-0.36, p值0.000)。结论:我们的研究结果将支持未来的研究,以确定AMB和泊沙康唑联合治疗毛霉病的疗效,并产生一个基于证据的标准治疗方案。
Use of any form of Amphotericin B Alone or with Posaconazole in COVID-19 Associated Mucormycosis (CAM) at the Time of Pandemic Disaster in a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital.
Background: The recent COVID-19 wave showed a significant rise in mucormycosis, changing its prevalence, particularly in India. Sadly, the total risk of mortality due to COVID-19 associated mucormycosis (CAM) remains high. It may be better to introduce a combination of drugs rather than unacceptable poor outcomes with Amphotericin B monotherapy.
Aim: The aim of this study is to assess the proportion of mucormycosis patient's clinical outcomes with antifungal agent (Amphotericin B of any forms alone) or combination drug therapy (Amphotericin B of any form and Posaconazole).
Methods: It was a retrospective cohort study conducted between April 1st, 2021 and July 31st, 2021 at the tertiary care teaching hospital All India Institutes of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Raipur.
Results: Out of 271 medical records of CAM patients, 211 records were included in the study. Among them, 46 patients (21.8%) received group 1 treatment i.e. Amphotericin only and 165 patients (78.2%) received group 2 treatment, i.e. Amphotericin B with Posaconazole. Group 2 was associated with a longer time to event, having a higher survival rate. The Hazard Ratio (HR) was 0.22 (95% CI - 0.13-0.36, p-value 0.000).
Conclusion: Our findings will support the need for future studies to determine the efficacy of AMB and posaconazole combination therapy in the treatment of mucormycosis and to produce an evidence-based standard treatment regimen.