早期心室复极患者的死亡率和室性心律失常。

Hugo Baldisserotto, Barbara Adelmann de Lima, Marco Aurélio Lumertz Saffi, Anderson Donelli da Silveira, Marcia Leonardi Baldisserotto, Tiago Luiz Luz Leiria
{"title":"早期心室复极患者的死亡率和室性心律失常。","authors":"Hugo Baldisserotto, Barbara Adelmann de Lima, Marco Aurélio Lumertz Saffi, Anderson Donelli da Silveira, Marcia Leonardi Baldisserotto, Tiago Luiz Luz Leiria","doi":"10.36660/abc.20240516","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recent research has linked early repolarization (ER) with increased ventricular fibrillation risk, especially in leads V1-V3 and in inferior and lateral regions. However, data on the Brazilian population are limited.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To estimate the impact of ER on survival and the occurrence of ventricular arrhythmias (VA) in patients over a 10-year period at a university hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included patients with ER on electrocardiogram from the hospital database. Descriptive analysis was conducted to describe patients' profile and characteristics. Kaplan-Meier method was utilized to analyze survival curves, with the log-rank test employed to assess differences between ER types. Cox regression models were applied to evaluate the risks of death and VA, calculating both gross and adjusted hazard ratios. The level of significance adopted in the statistical analysis was 5%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study population was predominantly male, average age of 45.6 years; 2.7% experienced VA (five in the group with lateral ER, four in the group with inferior ER group, and four in the ER inferolateral group). Significant differences were observed in age, sex, and HFrEF between the groups. Regarding all-cause mortality, 2.3% of patients died (five in the group with lateral ER, one in the group with inferior ER group, and five in the ER inferolateral group). Only age showed a statistically significant difference. There were significant differences in both death and VA between the groups (p=0.7 and p=0.5, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ER did not lead to a higher incidence of VA or all-cause mortality in this cohort.</p>","PeriodicalId":93887,"journal":{"name":"Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia","volume":"122 4","pages":"e20240516"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mortality and Ventricular Arrhythmia in Patients with Early Ventricular Repolarization.\",\"authors\":\"Hugo Baldisserotto, Barbara Adelmann de Lima, Marco Aurélio Lumertz Saffi, Anderson Donelli da Silveira, Marcia Leonardi Baldisserotto, Tiago Luiz Luz Leiria\",\"doi\":\"10.36660/abc.20240516\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recent research has linked early repolarization (ER) with increased ventricular fibrillation risk, especially in leads V1-V3 and in inferior and lateral regions. However, data on the Brazilian population are limited.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To estimate the impact of ER on survival and the occurrence of ventricular arrhythmias (VA) in patients over a 10-year period at a university hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included patients with ER on electrocardiogram from the hospital database. Descriptive analysis was conducted to describe patients' profile and characteristics. Kaplan-Meier method was utilized to analyze survival curves, with the log-rank test employed to assess differences between ER types. Cox regression models were applied to evaluate the risks of death and VA, calculating both gross and adjusted hazard ratios. The level of significance adopted in the statistical analysis was 5%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study population was predominantly male, average age of 45.6 years; 2.7% experienced VA (five in the group with lateral ER, four in the group with inferior ER group, and four in the ER inferolateral group). Significant differences were observed in age, sex, and HFrEF between the groups. Regarding all-cause mortality, 2.3% of patients died (five in the group with lateral ER, one in the group with inferior ER group, and five in the ER inferolateral group). Only age showed a statistically significant difference. There were significant differences in both death and VA between the groups (p=0.7 and p=0.5, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ER did not lead to a higher incidence of VA or all-cause mortality in this cohort.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93887,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia\",\"volume\":\"122 4\",\"pages\":\"e20240516\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36660/abc.20240516\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36660/abc.20240516","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:最近的研究将早期复极(ER)与心室颤动风险增加联系起来,特别是在V1-V3导联和下侧区。然而,关于巴西人口的数据有限。目的:评估ER对某大学医院10年间患者生存和室性心律失常(VA)发生的影响。方法:本回顾性队列研究纳入医院数据库中心电图有ER的患者。进行描述性分析,描述患者的概况和特征。生存曲线采用Kaplan-Meier法分析,ER类型间差异采用log-rank检验。应用Cox回归模型评估死亡和VA风险,计算总风险比和调整风险比。统计学分析采用显著性水平为5%。结果:研究人群以男性为主,平均年龄45.6岁;2.7%的患者发生了VA (ER外侧组5例,ER下组4例,ER外侧组4例)。两组间在年龄、性别和HFrEF方面存在显著差异。在全因死亡率方面,2.3%的患者死亡(外ER组5例,下ER组1例,外ER组5例)。只有年龄表现出统计学上的显著差异。两组之间的死亡率和VA差异均有统计学意义(p=0.7和p=0.5)。结论:在该队列中,ER并未导致更高的VA发生率或全因死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mortality and Ventricular Arrhythmia in Patients with Early Ventricular Repolarization.

Background: Recent research has linked early repolarization (ER) with increased ventricular fibrillation risk, especially in leads V1-V3 and in inferior and lateral regions. However, data on the Brazilian population are limited.

Objective: To estimate the impact of ER on survival and the occurrence of ventricular arrhythmias (VA) in patients over a 10-year period at a university hospital.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients with ER on electrocardiogram from the hospital database. Descriptive analysis was conducted to describe patients' profile and characteristics. Kaplan-Meier method was utilized to analyze survival curves, with the log-rank test employed to assess differences between ER types. Cox regression models were applied to evaluate the risks of death and VA, calculating both gross and adjusted hazard ratios. The level of significance adopted in the statistical analysis was 5%.

Results: The study population was predominantly male, average age of 45.6 years; 2.7% experienced VA (five in the group with lateral ER, four in the group with inferior ER group, and four in the ER inferolateral group). Significant differences were observed in age, sex, and HFrEF between the groups. Regarding all-cause mortality, 2.3% of patients died (five in the group with lateral ER, one in the group with inferior ER group, and five in the ER inferolateral group). Only age showed a statistically significant difference. There were significant differences in both death and VA between the groups (p=0.7 and p=0.5, respectively).

Conclusion: ER did not lead to a higher incidence of VA or all-cause mortality in this cohort.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信