运动试验检测WPW高危副通路的诊断测试准确性:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

José Nunes de Alencar, Fabio Mahamad Rassi, Raquel Pereira Rios, Matheus Kiszka Scheffer, Guilherme Dagostin de Carvalho
{"title":"运动试验检测WPW高危副通路的诊断测试准确性:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"José Nunes de Alencar, Fabio Mahamad Rassi, Raquel Pereira Rios, Matheus Kiszka Scheffer, Guilherme Dagostin de Carvalho","doi":"10.36660/abc.20240663","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Wolff-Parkinson-White (WPW) syndrome is characterized by ventricular pre-excitation, which can lead to severe arrhythmic events such as supraventricular tachycardia and pre-excited atrial fibrillation. The diagnostic value of non-invasive exercise tests in detecting high-risk accessory pathways remains inconsistent in the literature.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive exercise tests compared to invasive electrophysiological studies (EPS) for identifying high-risk accessory pathways in WPW syndrome.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following PRISMA-DTA guidelines, a comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. Eligible studies assessed the sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios of non-invasive exercise tests in WPW patients, using EPS as the reference standard. A bivariate random-effects model was applied for meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six studies, comprising a total of 765 patients, met the inclusion criteria. The pooled sensitivity was 92.7% (95% CI: 88.0% - 94.0%), while the pooled specificity was 28.1% (95% CI: 23% - 35.1%). A negative likelihood ratio (LR-) of 0.260 (95% CI: 0.174 - 0.387) indicated that the presence of a high-risk accessory pathway is about four times less likely after a negative test result. Sensitivity analysis restricted to pediatric patients showed consistent results.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Non-invasive exercise tests demonstrate a reasonable diagnostic utility for ruling out high-risk pathways in WPW syndrome. However, caution is advised when using these tests as standalone criteria for risk stratification.</p>","PeriodicalId":93887,"journal":{"name":"Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia","volume":"122 4","pages":"e20240663"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12107794/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic Test Accuracy of Exercise Testing in Detecting High-Risk Accessory Pathways in WPW: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"José Nunes de Alencar, Fabio Mahamad Rassi, Raquel Pereira Rios, Matheus Kiszka Scheffer, Guilherme Dagostin de Carvalho\",\"doi\":\"10.36660/abc.20240663\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Wolff-Parkinson-White (WPW) syndrome is characterized by ventricular pre-excitation, which can lead to severe arrhythmic events such as supraventricular tachycardia and pre-excited atrial fibrillation. The diagnostic value of non-invasive exercise tests in detecting high-risk accessory pathways remains inconsistent in the literature.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive exercise tests compared to invasive electrophysiological studies (EPS) for identifying high-risk accessory pathways in WPW syndrome.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following PRISMA-DTA guidelines, a comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. Eligible studies assessed the sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios of non-invasive exercise tests in WPW patients, using EPS as the reference standard. A bivariate random-effects model was applied for meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six studies, comprising a total of 765 patients, met the inclusion criteria. The pooled sensitivity was 92.7% (95% CI: 88.0% - 94.0%), while the pooled specificity was 28.1% (95% CI: 23% - 35.1%). A negative likelihood ratio (LR-) of 0.260 (95% CI: 0.174 - 0.387) indicated that the presence of a high-risk accessory pathway is about four times less likely after a negative test result. Sensitivity analysis restricted to pediatric patients showed consistent results.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Non-invasive exercise tests demonstrate a reasonable diagnostic utility for ruling out high-risk pathways in WPW syndrome. However, caution is advised when using these tests as standalone criteria for risk stratification.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93887,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia\",\"volume\":\"122 4\",\"pages\":\"e20240663\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12107794/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36660/abc.20240663\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36660/abc.20240663","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:Wolff-Parkinson-White (WPW)综合征以心室预兴奋为特征,可导致严重的心律失常事件,如室上性心动过速和预兴奋性心房颤动。无创运动试验在检测高危副通路中的诊断价值在文献中仍不一致。目的:评价无创运动试验与有创电生理研究(EPS)鉴别WPW综合征高危副通路的诊断准确性。方法:遵循PRISMA-DTA指南,在PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science数据库中进行全面检索。符合条件的研究以EPS为参考标准,评估WPW患者无创运动试验的敏感性、特异性和似然比。采用双变量随机效应模型进行meta分析。结果:6项研究,共计765例患者符合纳入标准。合并敏感性为92.7% (95% CI: 88.0% ~ 94.0%),合并特异性为28.1% (95% CI: 23% ~ 35.1%)。负似然比(LR-)为0.260 (95% CI: 0.174 - 0.387)表明,检测结果为阴性后,存在高危副通路的可能性降低了约4倍。仅限于儿科患者的敏感性分析显示了一致的结果。结论:无创运动试验为排除WPW综合征的高危途径提供了合理的诊断工具。然而,当使用这些测试作为风险分层的独立标准时,建议谨慎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diagnostic Test Accuracy of Exercise Testing in Detecting High-Risk Accessory Pathways in WPW: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: Wolff-Parkinson-White (WPW) syndrome is characterized by ventricular pre-excitation, which can lead to severe arrhythmic events such as supraventricular tachycardia and pre-excited atrial fibrillation. The diagnostic value of non-invasive exercise tests in detecting high-risk accessory pathways remains inconsistent in the literature.

Objectives: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive exercise tests compared to invasive electrophysiological studies (EPS) for identifying high-risk accessory pathways in WPW syndrome.

Methods: Following PRISMA-DTA guidelines, a comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. Eligible studies assessed the sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios of non-invasive exercise tests in WPW patients, using EPS as the reference standard. A bivariate random-effects model was applied for meta-analysis.

Results: Six studies, comprising a total of 765 patients, met the inclusion criteria. The pooled sensitivity was 92.7% (95% CI: 88.0% - 94.0%), while the pooled specificity was 28.1% (95% CI: 23% - 35.1%). A negative likelihood ratio (LR-) of 0.260 (95% CI: 0.174 - 0.387) indicated that the presence of a high-risk accessory pathway is about four times less likely after a negative test result. Sensitivity analysis restricted to pediatric patients showed consistent results.

Conclusion: Non-invasive exercise tests demonstrate a reasonable diagnostic utility for ruling out high-risk pathways in WPW syndrome. However, caution is advised when using these tests as standalone criteria for risk stratification.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信