血管及血管内假体感染患者假体周围材料穿刺引流的优点。

IF 5.7 1区 医学 Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Giulia Colonna, Reinoud P H Bokkers, Marjan Wouthuyzen Bakker, Barzi Gareb, Maurizio Taurino, Clark J Zeebregts, Ben R Saleem
{"title":"血管及血管内假体感染患者假体周围材料穿刺引流的优点。","authors":"Giulia Colonna, Reinoud P H Bokkers, Marjan Wouthuyzen Bakker, Barzi Gareb, Maurizio Taurino, Clark J Zeebregts, Ben R Saleem","doi":"10.1016/j.ejvs.2025.04.059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Vascular graft or endograft infections (VGEIs) pose significant challenges due to their rarity and potential for severe complications. Direct identification of micro-organisms is highly recommended by the European Society for Vascular Surgery guidelines, yet standardised approaches are limited to the literature. Percutaneous drainage followed by lifelong suppressive antimicrobial therapy offers a viable alternative for high risk patients. This study evaluated the diagnostic and therapeutic implications of percutaneous cultures in abdominal and peripheral VGEIs and assessed the efficacy of conservative treatment when surgery is unfeasible.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study of all patients admitted to a tertiary referral centre with suspected abdominal or peripheral VGEI, according to Management of Aortic Graft Infection Collaboration (MAGIC) criteria, and who underwent percutaneous procedures between 2017 and 2023. The diagnostic accuracy of percutaneous cultures was evaluated by comparing their results with the final diagnosis of VGEI based on MAGIC criteria, and analysing the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value. Additionally, the influence of percutaneous cultures on antibiotic therapy adjustment and conservative treatment choice was investigated. Survival outcomes were compared between patients who were conservatively treated and those who underwent total or partial surgical graft removal.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 69 patients: 45 with suspected abdominal VGEI and 24 with suspected peripheral VGEI. Percutaneous culture results statistically significantly correlated with VGEI diagnosis (p = .023 and p = .048, respectively), with a sensitivity and specificity of 50% and 70% in abdominal infections and 80% and 68% in peripheral infections, respectively. Percutaneous procedures statistically significantly impacted the choice of antibiotic therapy (p < .001 and p = .011). Overall survival for conservative treatment was comparable with surgical graft extraction (p= .63 and p = .25).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Percutaneous cultures offer high specificity for VGEI diagnosis and can be used to guide effective personalised antibiotic therapy. For inoperable patients, drainage with lifelong antimicrobial treatment is a valuable conservative option.</p>","PeriodicalId":55160,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Merits of Puncture and Drainage of Perigraft Material in Patients with Vascular and Endovascular Prosthetic Graft Infection.\",\"authors\":\"Giulia Colonna, Reinoud P H Bokkers, Marjan Wouthuyzen Bakker, Barzi Gareb, Maurizio Taurino, Clark J Zeebregts, Ben R Saleem\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejvs.2025.04.059\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Vascular graft or endograft infections (VGEIs) pose significant challenges due to their rarity and potential for severe complications. Direct identification of micro-organisms is highly recommended by the European Society for Vascular Surgery guidelines, yet standardised approaches are limited to the literature. Percutaneous drainage followed by lifelong suppressive antimicrobial therapy offers a viable alternative for high risk patients. This study evaluated the diagnostic and therapeutic implications of percutaneous cultures in abdominal and peripheral VGEIs and assessed the efficacy of conservative treatment when surgery is unfeasible.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study of all patients admitted to a tertiary referral centre with suspected abdominal or peripheral VGEI, according to Management of Aortic Graft Infection Collaboration (MAGIC) criteria, and who underwent percutaneous procedures between 2017 and 2023. The diagnostic accuracy of percutaneous cultures was evaluated by comparing their results with the final diagnosis of VGEI based on MAGIC criteria, and analysing the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value. Additionally, the influence of percutaneous cultures on antibiotic therapy adjustment and conservative treatment choice was investigated. Survival outcomes were compared between patients who were conservatively treated and those who underwent total or partial surgical graft removal.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 69 patients: 45 with suspected abdominal VGEI and 24 with suspected peripheral VGEI. Percutaneous culture results statistically significantly correlated with VGEI diagnosis (p = .023 and p = .048, respectively), with a sensitivity and specificity of 50% and 70% in abdominal infections and 80% and 68% in peripheral infections, respectively. Percutaneous procedures statistically significantly impacted the choice of antibiotic therapy (p < .001 and p = .011). Overall survival for conservative treatment was comparable with surgical graft extraction (p= .63 and p = .25).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Percutaneous cultures offer high specificity for VGEI diagnosis and can be used to guide effective personalised antibiotic therapy. For inoperable patients, drainage with lifelong antimicrobial treatment is a valuable conservative option.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55160,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2025.04.059\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2025.04.059","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:血管移植或血管内移植感染(VGEIs)因其罕见和潜在的严重并发症而面临重大挑战。欧洲血管外科学会指南强烈推荐直接鉴定微生物,但标准化方法仅限于文献。经皮引流后终生抑制抗菌药物治疗为高风险患者提供了可行的选择。本研究评估了经皮培养对腹部和外周VGEIs的诊断和治疗意义,并评估了在手术不可行的情况下保守治疗的效果。方法:这是一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了2017年至2023年间接受经皮手术的所有三级转诊中心疑似腹部或外周VGEI患者,这些患者符合主动脉移植物感染管理协作(MAGIC)标准。通过将经皮培养结果与基于MAGIC标准的VGEI最终诊断结果进行比较,并分析其敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值,评价经皮培养诊断的准确性。此外,还探讨了经皮培养对抗生素治疗调整和保守治疗选择的影响。对保守治疗和全部或部分手术移植物切除患者的生存结果进行比较。结果:本研究纳入69例患者:45例疑似腹部VGEI, 24例疑似外周VGEI。经皮培养结果与VGEI诊断有统计学显著相关(p =。023和p =。048),腹部感染的敏感性和特异性分别为50%和70%,外周感染的敏感性和特异性分别为80%和68%。结论:经皮培养对VGEI的诊断具有较高的特异性,可用于指导有效的个性化抗生素治疗。对于不能手术的患者,终身抗菌治疗引流是一个有价值的保守选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Merits of Puncture and Drainage of Perigraft Material in Patients with Vascular and Endovascular Prosthetic Graft Infection.

Objective: Vascular graft or endograft infections (VGEIs) pose significant challenges due to their rarity and potential for severe complications. Direct identification of micro-organisms is highly recommended by the European Society for Vascular Surgery guidelines, yet standardised approaches are limited to the literature. Percutaneous drainage followed by lifelong suppressive antimicrobial therapy offers a viable alternative for high risk patients. This study evaluated the diagnostic and therapeutic implications of percutaneous cultures in abdominal and peripheral VGEIs and assessed the efficacy of conservative treatment when surgery is unfeasible.

Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of all patients admitted to a tertiary referral centre with suspected abdominal or peripheral VGEI, according to Management of Aortic Graft Infection Collaboration (MAGIC) criteria, and who underwent percutaneous procedures between 2017 and 2023. The diagnostic accuracy of percutaneous cultures was evaluated by comparing their results with the final diagnosis of VGEI based on MAGIC criteria, and analysing the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value. Additionally, the influence of percutaneous cultures on antibiotic therapy adjustment and conservative treatment choice was investigated. Survival outcomes were compared between patients who were conservatively treated and those who underwent total or partial surgical graft removal.

Results: The study included 69 patients: 45 with suspected abdominal VGEI and 24 with suspected peripheral VGEI. Percutaneous culture results statistically significantly correlated with VGEI diagnosis (p = .023 and p = .048, respectively), with a sensitivity and specificity of 50% and 70% in abdominal infections and 80% and 68% in peripheral infections, respectively. Percutaneous procedures statistically significantly impacted the choice of antibiotic therapy (p < .001 and p = .011). Overall survival for conservative treatment was comparable with surgical graft extraction (p= .63 and p = .25).

Conclusion: Percutaneous cultures offer high specificity for VGEI diagnosis and can be used to guide effective personalised antibiotic therapy. For inoperable patients, drainage with lifelong antimicrobial treatment is a valuable conservative option.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
15.80%
发文量
471
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery is aimed primarily at vascular surgeons dealing with patients with arterial, venous and lymphatic diseases. Contributions are included on the diagnosis, investigation and management of these vascular disorders. Papers that consider the technical aspects of vascular surgery are encouraged, and the journal includes invited state-of-the-art articles. Reflecting the increasing importance of endovascular techniques in the management of vascular diseases and the value of closer collaboration between the vascular surgeon and the vascular radiologist, the journal has now extended its scope to encompass the growing number of contributions from this exciting field. Articles describing endovascular method and their critical evaluation are included, as well as reports on the emerging technology associated with this field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信