卵圆孔未闭的治疗。

IF 7.6 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Christian Pristipino, John Carroll, Jean-Louis Mas, Nina C Wunderlich, Lars Sondergaard
{"title":"卵圆孔未闭的治疗。","authors":"Christian Pristipino, John Carroll, Jean-Louis Mas, Nina C Wunderlich, Lars Sondergaard","doi":"10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00915","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>After extensive debate, the percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) has been established as a first-line treatment for the secondary prevention of PFO-related stroke in patients between 18 and 60 years old, whereas the role of PFO closure for primary prevention remains controversial. Additionally, in selected cases, PFO closure may be considered beyond these age limits and for other indications such as the treatment of systemic deoxygenation syndromes and the secondary prevention of systemic embolism or decompression sickness, when the PFO has been determined to be causative in the condition. In all cases, an in-depth diagnostic work-up, requiring collaboration among different specialists, is necessary to estimate the likelihood of PFO being related to the clinical condition. Since the first percutaneous closure of an atrial septal defect in 1976, the technique has been adapted and simplified for PFO. It is now well standardised with double-disc occluders, which are widely adopted because of their ease of use and evidence-based efficacy and safety. The procedure is generally straightforward, but some anatomical characteristics may be challenging. The choice of device and drug therapy after the procedure is currently empirical and guided by patient characteristics. Early and late complications of the procedure are infrequent but require early diagnosis. Further evidence is eagerly awaited to improve diagnosis, define other indications, make better procedural choices, and prescribe the most effective drug therapy after closure.</p>","PeriodicalId":54378,"journal":{"name":"Eurointervention","volume":"21 10","pages":"505-524"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12063554/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Treatment of patent foramen ovale.\",\"authors\":\"Christian Pristipino, John Carroll, Jean-Louis Mas, Nina C Wunderlich, Lars Sondergaard\",\"doi\":\"10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00915\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>After extensive debate, the percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) has been established as a first-line treatment for the secondary prevention of PFO-related stroke in patients between 18 and 60 years old, whereas the role of PFO closure for primary prevention remains controversial. Additionally, in selected cases, PFO closure may be considered beyond these age limits and for other indications such as the treatment of systemic deoxygenation syndromes and the secondary prevention of systemic embolism or decompression sickness, when the PFO has been determined to be causative in the condition. In all cases, an in-depth diagnostic work-up, requiring collaboration among different specialists, is necessary to estimate the likelihood of PFO being related to the clinical condition. Since the first percutaneous closure of an atrial septal defect in 1976, the technique has been adapted and simplified for PFO. It is now well standardised with double-disc occluders, which are widely adopted because of their ease of use and evidence-based efficacy and safety. The procedure is generally straightforward, but some anatomical characteristics may be challenging. The choice of device and drug therapy after the procedure is currently empirical and guided by patient characteristics. Early and late complications of the procedure are infrequent but require early diagnosis. Further evidence is eagerly awaited to improve diagnosis, define other indications, make better procedural choices, and prescribe the most effective drug therapy after closure.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54378,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Eurointervention\",\"volume\":\"21 10\",\"pages\":\"505-524\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12063554/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Eurointervention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00915\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eurointervention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00915","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

经过广泛的争论,经皮闭合卵圆孔未闭(PFO)已被确定为18至60岁患者PFO相关卒中二级预防的一线治疗方法,而PFO闭合在一级预防中的作用仍存在争议。此外,在选定的病例中,当PFO被确定为病因时,可以考虑在超过这些年龄限制的情况下关闭PFO,并用于其他适应症,如治疗全身脱氧综合征和全身栓塞或减压病的二级预防。在所有情况下,深入的诊断检查是必要的,需要不同专家之间的合作,以估计PFO与临床状况相关的可能性。自1976年首次经皮房间隔缺损闭合术以来,该技术已适应并简化了PFO。现在双椎间盘闭塞器已经很好地标准化了,由于其易于使用和基于证据的有效性和安全性,双椎间盘闭塞器被广泛采用。手术通常是简单的,但一些解剖特征可能具有挑战性。手术后设备和药物治疗的选择目前是经验性的,并以患者的特点为指导。早期和晚期并发症的程序是罕见的,但需要早期诊断。迫切需要进一步的证据来改善诊断,确定其他适应症,做出更好的程序选择,并在关闭后开出最有效的药物治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Treatment of patent foramen ovale.

After extensive debate, the percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) has been established as a first-line treatment for the secondary prevention of PFO-related stroke in patients between 18 and 60 years old, whereas the role of PFO closure for primary prevention remains controversial. Additionally, in selected cases, PFO closure may be considered beyond these age limits and for other indications such as the treatment of systemic deoxygenation syndromes and the secondary prevention of systemic embolism or decompression sickness, when the PFO has been determined to be causative in the condition. In all cases, an in-depth diagnostic work-up, requiring collaboration among different specialists, is necessary to estimate the likelihood of PFO being related to the clinical condition. Since the first percutaneous closure of an atrial septal defect in 1976, the technique has been adapted and simplified for PFO. It is now well standardised with double-disc occluders, which are widely adopted because of their ease of use and evidence-based efficacy and safety. The procedure is generally straightforward, but some anatomical characteristics may be challenging. The choice of device and drug therapy after the procedure is currently empirical and guided by patient characteristics. Early and late complications of the procedure are infrequent but require early diagnosis. Further evidence is eagerly awaited to improve diagnosis, define other indications, make better procedural choices, and prescribe the most effective drug therapy after closure.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Eurointervention
Eurointervention CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
380
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: EuroIntervention Journal is an international, English language, peer-reviewed journal whose aim is to create a community of high quality research and education in the field of percutaneous and surgical cardiovascular interventions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信