解码呼吸系统护理中的药物不良反应:印度一家三级护理医院的前瞻性预测和基于严重程度的分析。

IF 1.1 Q4 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Vaishnavi V Gaonkar, Vinay V Shanbhag, Mandati Santhosh Reddy, M S Ganachari
{"title":"解码呼吸系统护理中的药物不良反应:印度一家三级护理医院的前瞻性预测和基于严重程度的分析。","authors":"Vaishnavi V Gaonkar, Vinay V Shanbhag, Mandati Santhosh Reddy, M S Ganachari","doi":"10.4081/monaldi.2025.3464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are a major concern in healthcare, including morbidity, longer hospitalization, and increased healthcare expenses. Despite the necessity of ADR monitoring, reporting is poor, particularly in developing countries such as India. This study assessed the severity, predictability, and causality of ADRs in a tertiary care hospital's respiratory department. A prospective observational study was conducted at KLE's Dr. Prabhakar Kore Hospital, Belagavi, Karnataka, from September 2023 to January 2025. Patients aged 45 years and above with chronic respiratory conditions were included. ADRs were assessed using validated scales, including the World Health Organization-Uppsala Monitoring Centre Scale, Modified Hartwig and Siegel Scale, and Predictability Assessment. Descriptive statistics were applied to analyze ADR patterns. Among the 107 patients enrolled, 63.5% were elderly and 59.8% were female. Mild ADRs accounted for 60.7% of cases, while serious responses were reported in 3.7%. Predictability analysis revealed that 77.5% of ADRs were foreseeable. Causality assessment revealed ADRs as probable (51.4%), possible (37.3%), and certain (10.2%). Drug withdrawal was the most popular intervention (55.1%). The most commonly reported ADRs were gastrointestinal disorders (33.6%), followed by respiratory (18.6%) and cardiovascular disorders (16.8%). The study highlighted the need for improved pharmacovigilance programs to reduce ADR-related hazards in respiratory patients. Improving ADR reporting methods and predictive assessments can enhance patient safety and maximize therapeutic outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":51593,"journal":{"name":"Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Decoding adverse drug reactions in respiratory care: a prospective predictive and severity-based analysis at a tertiary care hospital in India.\",\"authors\":\"Vaishnavi V Gaonkar, Vinay V Shanbhag, Mandati Santhosh Reddy, M S Ganachari\",\"doi\":\"10.4081/monaldi.2025.3464\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are a major concern in healthcare, including morbidity, longer hospitalization, and increased healthcare expenses. Despite the necessity of ADR monitoring, reporting is poor, particularly in developing countries such as India. This study assessed the severity, predictability, and causality of ADRs in a tertiary care hospital's respiratory department. A prospective observational study was conducted at KLE's Dr. Prabhakar Kore Hospital, Belagavi, Karnataka, from September 2023 to January 2025. Patients aged 45 years and above with chronic respiratory conditions were included. ADRs were assessed using validated scales, including the World Health Organization-Uppsala Monitoring Centre Scale, Modified Hartwig and Siegel Scale, and Predictability Assessment. Descriptive statistics were applied to analyze ADR patterns. Among the 107 patients enrolled, 63.5% were elderly and 59.8% were female. Mild ADRs accounted for 60.7% of cases, while serious responses were reported in 3.7%. Predictability analysis revealed that 77.5% of ADRs were foreseeable. Causality assessment revealed ADRs as probable (51.4%), possible (37.3%), and certain (10.2%). Drug withdrawal was the most popular intervention (55.1%). The most commonly reported ADRs were gastrointestinal disorders (33.6%), followed by respiratory (18.6%) and cardiovascular disorders (16.8%). The study highlighted the need for improved pharmacovigilance programs to reduce ADR-related hazards in respiratory patients. Improving ADR reporting methods and predictive assessments can enhance patient safety and maximize therapeutic outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51593,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4081/monaldi.2025.3464\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/monaldi.2025.3464","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

药物不良反应(adr)是医疗保健中的一个主要问题,包括发病率、住院时间延长和医疗费用增加。尽管有必要进行药品不良反应监测,但报告情况很差,特别是在印度等发展中国家。本研究评估了三级护理医院呼吸科adr的严重程度、可预测性和因果关系。一项前瞻性观察研究于2023年9月至2025年1月在卡纳塔克邦Belagavi的KLE Dr. Prabhakar Kore医院进行。患者年龄在45岁及以上,患有慢性呼吸系统疾病。采用经验证的量表对不良反应进行评估,包括世界卫生组织-乌普萨拉监测中心量表、修改的Hartwig和Siegel量表和可预测性评估。采用描述性统计分析不良反应模式。纳入的107例患者中,63.5%为老年人,59.8%为女性。轻度不良反应占60.7%,严重不良反应占3.7%。可预测性分析显示,77.5%的adr是可预见的。因果关系评估显示不良反应为可能(51.4%)、可能(37.3%)和确定(10.2%)。戒断药物是最常见的干预措施(55.1%)。最常见的不良反应是胃肠道疾病(33.6%),其次是呼吸系统疾病(18.6%)和心血管疾病(16.8%)。该研究强调需要改进药物警戒计划,以减少呼吸系统患者的adr相关危害。改进不良反应报告方法和预测性评估可以提高患者的安全性并最大限度地提高治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Decoding adverse drug reactions in respiratory care: a prospective predictive and severity-based analysis at a tertiary care hospital in India.

Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are a major concern in healthcare, including morbidity, longer hospitalization, and increased healthcare expenses. Despite the necessity of ADR monitoring, reporting is poor, particularly in developing countries such as India. This study assessed the severity, predictability, and causality of ADRs in a tertiary care hospital's respiratory department. A prospective observational study was conducted at KLE's Dr. Prabhakar Kore Hospital, Belagavi, Karnataka, from September 2023 to January 2025. Patients aged 45 years and above with chronic respiratory conditions were included. ADRs were assessed using validated scales, including the World Health Organization-Uppsala Monitoring Centre Scale, Modified Hartwig and Siegel Scale, and Predictability Assessment. Descriptive statistics were applied to analyze ADR patterns. Among the 107 patients enrolled, 63.5% were elderly and 59.8% were female. Mild ADRs accounted for 60.7% of cases, while serious responses were reported in 3.7%. Predictability analysis revealed that 77.5% of ADRs were foreseeable. Causality assessment revealed ADRs as probable (51.4%), possible (37.3%), and certain (10.2%). Drug withdrawal was the most popular intervention (55.1%). The most commonly reported ADRs were gastrointestinal disorders (33.6%), followed by respiratory (18.6%) and cardiovascular disorders (16.8%). The study highlighted the need for improved pharmacovigilance programs to reduce ADR-related hazards in respiratory patients. Improving ADR reporting methods and predictive assessments can enhance patient safety and maximize therapeutic outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信