类似车祸中男性和女性suv驾驶员受伤率的比较。

IF 1.6 3区 工程技术 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Charles M Farmer
{"title":"类似车祸中男性和女性suv驾驶员受伤率的比较。","authors":"Charles M Farmer","doi":"10.1080/15389588.2025.2496939","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The current study sought to determine the extent of differences in serious injury risk by sex using crash data maintained by individual U.S. states. As with many earlier studies, crash and vehicle differences were controlled. The vehicles of interest were restricted to SUVs, the most popular vehicle type in the U.S.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Records of SUV-driver crash involvements during 2017 to 2023 were obtained from motor-vehicle crash files maintained by 13 states. Logistic regressions were used to model the odds of a serious or fatal injury for each of the states (A or K on the KABCO scale). Common predictors were light condition (dark vs. daylight), road surface condition (dry vs. slippery), vehicle age (7-12 years old vs. younger), vehicle weight ratio (case vehicle to partner vehicle), driver age (< 25 years vs. 25-64 years vs. 65+ years), and driver sex (female vs. male). An overall female-to-male injury odds ratio was computed from the weighted average of the logarithms of individual state odds ratios.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The data were restricted to safety-belt-restrained SUV drivers in head-on crashes with another passenger vehicle. Serious and fatal injuries were coded for 3.8% of the female drivers and 3.4% of the male drivers. Crashes in darkness and crashes of older drivers were significantly more likely to result in serious/fatal injuries, while crashes of younger drivers were significantly less likely to result in serious/fatal injuries. Female drivers were 17% more likely than males to incur serious/fatal injuries (95% confidence limits 8% to 27%). When the opposing vehicle was another SUV, female drivers were only 11% more likely than males to incur serious/fatal injuries (95% confidence limits -4% to 28%). However, female drivers were 20% more likely than males to incur at least minor injuries (95% confidence limits 13% to 28%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Observed differences in serious injury rates for female and male drivers declined after accounting for other driver, vehicle, and crash characteristics. In similar crash circumstances, female drivers are more likely than males to be injured, but this difference is clear only for minor injuries.</p>","PeriodicalId":54422,"journal":{"name":"Traffic Injury Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of male and female SUV-driver injury rates in similar crashes.\",\"authors\":\"Charles M Farmer\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15389588.2025.2496939\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The current study sought to determine the extent of differences in serious injury risk by sex using crash data maintained by individual U.S. states. As with many earlier studies, crash and vehicle differences were controlled. The vehicles of interest were restricted to SUVs, the most popular vehicle type in the U.S.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Records of SUV-driver crash involvements during 2017 to 2023 were obtained from motor-vehicle crash files maintained by 13 states. Logistic regressions were used to model the odds of a serious or fatal injury for each of the states (A or K on the KABCO scale). Common predictors were light condition (dark vs. daylight), road surface condition (dry vs. slippery), vehicle age (7-12 years old vs. younger), vehicle weight ratio (case vehicle to partner vehicle), driver age (< 25 years vs. 25-64 years vs. 65+ years), and driver sex (female vs. male). An overall female-to-male injury odds ratio was computed from the weighted average of the logarithms of individual state odds ratios.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The data were restricted to safety-belt-restrained SUV drivers in head-on crashes with another passenger vehicle. Serious and fatal injuries were coded for 3.8% of the female drivers and 3.4% of the male drivers. Crashes in darkness and crashes of older drivers were significantly more likely to result in serious/fatal injuries, while crashes of younger drivers were significantly less likely to result in serious/fatal injuries. Female drivers were 17% more likely than males to incur serious/fatal injuries (95% confidence limits 8% to 27%). When the opposing vehicle was another SUV, female drivers were only 11% more likely than males to incur serious/fatal injuries (95% confidence limits -4% to 28%). However, female drivers were 20% more likely than males to incur at least minor injuries (95% confidence limits 13% to 28%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Observed differences in serious injury rates for female and male drivers declined after accounting for other driver, vehicle, and crash characteristics. In similar crash circumstances, female drivers are more likely than males to be injured, but this difference is clear only for minor injuries.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54422,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Traffic Injury Prevention\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Traffic Injury Prevention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2025.2496939\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Traffic Injury Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2025.2496939","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:目前的研究试图利用美国各州保存的碰撞数据来确定严重伤害风险的性别差异程度。与许多早期的研究一样,碰撞和车辆差异得到了控制。相关车辆仅限于suv,这是美国最受欢迎的车型。方法:从13个州保存的机动车碰撞档案中获得2017年至2023年suv驾驶员碰撞涉及的记录。使用逻辑回归来模拟每个州(KABCO量表上的a或K)严重或致命伤害的几率。常见的预测因素是光照条件(黑暗vs白天)、路面状况(干燥vs湿滑)、车辆年龄(7-12岁vs更年轻)、车辆重量比(病例车与伴侣车)、驾驶员年龄(< 25岁vs 25-64岁vs 65岁以上)和驾驶员性别(女性vs男性)。从个体状态比值比的对数的加权平均值计算总体女性与男性的伤害比值比。结果:数据仅限于与另一辆乘用车正面碰撞时系安全带的SUV驾驶员。严重和致命伤害的编码为3.8%的女性司机和3.4%的男性司机。夜间交通事故和老年司机的交通事故更容易造成严重/致命伤害,而年轻司机的交通事故造成严重/致命伤害的可能性要小得多。女性司机遭受严重/致命伤害的可能性比男性高17%(95%置信限为8%至27%)。当对面的车辆是另一辆SUV时,女性司机遭受严重/致命伤害的可能性仅比男性高11%(95%置信限-4%至28%)。然而,女性司机造成轻伤的可能性比男性高20%(95%置信限为13%至28%)。结论:考虑到其他驾驶员、车辆和碰撞特征后,观察到的女性和男性驾驶员严重伤害率的差异有所下降。在类似的撞车情况下,女性司机比男性司机更容易受伤,但这种差异仅在轻伤方面表现得明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of male and female SUV-driver injury rates in similar crashes.

Objective: The current study sought to determine the extent of differences in serious injury risk by sex using crash data maintained by individual U.S. states. As with many earlier studies, crash and vehicle differences were controlled. The vehicles of interest were restricted to SUVs, the most popular vehicle type in the U.S.

Methods: Records of SUV-driver crash involvements during 2017 to 2023 were obtained from motor-vehicle crash files maintained by 13 states. Logistic regressions were used to model the odds of a serious or fatal injury for each of the states (A or K on the KABCO scale). Common predictors were light condition (dark vs. daylight), road surface condition (dry vs. slippery), vehicle age (7-12 years old vs. younger), vehicle weight ratio (case vehicle to partner vehicle), driver age (< 25 years vs. 25-64 years vs. 65+ years), and driver sex (female vs. male). An overall female-to-male injury odds ratio was computed from the weighted average of the logarithms of individual state odds ratios.

Results: The data were restricted to safety-belt-restrained SUV drivers in head-on crashes with another passenger vehicle. Serious and fatal injuries were coded for 3.8% of the female drivers and 3.4% of the male drivers. Crashes in darkness and crashes of older drivers were significantly more likely to result in serious/fatal injuries, while crashes of younger drivers were significantly less likely to result in serious/fatal injuries. Female drivers were 17% more likely than males to incur serious/fatal injuries (95% confidence limits 8% to 27%). When the opposing vehicle was another SUV, female drivers were only 11% more likely than males to incur serious/fatal injuries (95% confidence limits -4% to 28%). However, female drivers were 20% more likely than males to incur at least minor injuries (95% confidence limits 13% to 28%).

Conclusions: Observed differences in serious injury rates for female and male drivers declined after accounting for other driver, vehicle, and crash characteristics. In similar crash circumstances, female drivers are more likely than males to be injured, but this difference is clear only for minor injuries.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Traffic Injury Prevention
Traffic Injury Prevention PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
137
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The purpose of Traffic Injury Prevention is to bridge the disciplines of medicine, engineering, public health and traffic safety in order to foster the science of traffic injury prevention. The archival journal focuses on research, interventions and evaluations within the areas of traffic safety, crash causation, injury prevention and treatment. General topics within the journal''s scope are driver behavior, road infrastructure, emerging crash avoidance technologies, crash and injury epidemiology, alcohol and drugs, impact injury biomechanics, vehicle crashworthiness, occupant restraints, pedestrian safety, evaluation of interventions, economic consequences and emergency and clinical care with specific application to traffic injury prevention. The journal includes full length papers, review articles, case studies, brief technical notes and commentaries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信