模拟雪崩与树井掩埋对人体生理的影响。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Nicholas C Kanaan, Jibreel Abdul Cader, Joseph Krakker, Heather Beasley, Colin K Grissom, Scott E McIntosh
{"title":"模拟雪崩与树井掩埋对人体生理的影响。","authors":"Nicholas C Kanaan, Jibreel Abdul Cader, Joseph Krakker, Heather Beasley, Colin K Grissom, Scott E McIntosh","doi":"10.1177/10806032251337476","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionAvalanches and tree-wells (TW) are causes of snow immersion death in skiers and snowboarders. TW burials may have different victim physiology profiles and rescue considerations than avalanche-related burials due to snow density, burial position, and compensatory physiologic responses. This study aimed to compare the physiological responses between avalanche and TW burials through a prospective controlled trial of simulated avalanche burial to simulated TW burial.MethodsEleven volunteers participated in two paired 60-min snow burials: Avalanche and TW simulations, controlling for position and snowpack densities. We monitored core temperature, respiratory rate, minute ventilation, end-tidal carbon dioxide, oxygen saturation, partial pressure of inspired carbon dioxide, and heart rate.ResultsThe average cooling rate for the avalanche simulation was -0.017(Δ°C/min) versus -0.012(Δ°C/min) for the TW simulation (<i>p</i> = 0.014*), 1.42 times faster cooling rate than TW burial. SpO2 decreased 10.9 times faster on average in TW burial than in avalanche conditions when normalized by burial time as a rate (avalanche -0.011 vs TW -0.12 (Δ%/min), <i>p</i> = 0.033*). More participants requested early study termination in the TW scenario.DiscussionSimulated TW burial resulted in a statistically significant slower rate of core temperature cooling and earlier hypoxemia. Inverted body position in TW burials may lead to increased physiologic distress and contribute to earlier hypoxia. These findings may have important implications for search and rescue as well as resuscitation efforts for snow burial victims.</p>","PeriodicalId":49360,"journal":{"name":"Wilderness & Environmental Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"10806032251337476"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Simulated Avalanche vs Tree-Well Burial Effects on Human Physiology.\",\"authors\":\"Nicholas C Kanaan, Jibreel Abdul Cader, Joseph Krakker, Heather Beasley, Colin K Grissom, Scott E McIntosh\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10806032251337476\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>IntroductionAvalanches and tree-wells (TW) are causes of snow immersion death in skiers and snowboarders. TW burials may have different victim physiology profiles and rescue considerations than avalanche-related burials due to snow density, burial position, and compensatory physiologic responses. This study aimed to compare the physiological responses between avalanche and TW burials through a prospective controlled trial of simulated avalanche burial to simulated TW burial.MethodsEleven volunteers participated in two paired 60-min snow burials: Avalanche and TW simulations, controlling for position and snowpack densities. We monitored core temperature, respiratory rate, minute ventilation, end-tidal carbon dioxide, oxygen saturation, partial pressure of inspired carbon dioxide, and heart rate.ResultsThe average cooling rate for the avalanche simulation was -0.017(Δ°C/min) versus -0.012(Δ°C/min) for the TW simulation (<i>p</i> = 0.014*), 1.42 times faster cooling rate than TW burial. SpO2 decreased 10.9 times faster on average in TW burial than in avalanche conditions when normalized by burial time as a rate (avalanche -0.011 vs TW -0.12 (Δ%/min), <i>p</i> = 0.033*). More participants requested early study termination in the TW scenario.DiscussionSimulated TW burial resulted in a statistically significant slower rate of core temperature cooling and earlier hypoxemia. Inverted body position in TW burials may lead to increased physiologic distress and contribute to earlier hypoxia. These findings may have important implications for search and rescue as well as resuscitation efforts for snow burial victims.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49360,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wilderness & Environmental Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"10806032251337476\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wilderness & Environmental Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10806032251337476\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wilderness & Environmental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10806032251337476","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

雪崩和树井(TW)是滑雪者和单板滑雪者雪浸死亡的原因。由于积雪密度、掩埋位置和代偿性生理反应的不同,与雪崩相关的掩埋相比,TW掩埋可能具有不同的受害者生理特征和救援考虑。本研究旨在通过模拟雪崩掩埋与模拟TW掩埋的前瞻性对照试验,比较雪崩掩埋与TW掩埋之间的生理反应。方法在控制位置和积雪密度的条件下,2名志愿者分别参加雪崩和TW模拟。我们监测了核心温度,呼吸频率,分钟通气量,潮末二氧化碳,氧饱和度,吸入二氧化碳分压和心率。结果雪崩模拟的平均冷却速度为-0.017(Δ°C/min), TW模拟的平均冷却速度为-0.012(Δ°C/min) (p = 0.014*),比TW掩埋快1.42倍。当按掩埋时间归一化时,TW掩埋条件下SpO2的平均下降速度是雪崩条件下的10.9倍(雪崩-0.011 vs TW -0.12 (Δ%/min), p = 0.033*)。在TW方案中,更多的参与者要求提前终止研究。模拟的TW埋藏导致了统计上显著的核心温度冷却速度减慢和低氧血症的早期发生。倒立的体位可能导致生理窘迫增加,并导致早期缺氧。这些发现可能对雪埋受害者的搜救和复苏工作具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Simulated Avalanche vs Tree-Well Burial Effects on Human Physiology.

IntroductionAvalanches and tree-wells (TW) are causes of snow immersion death in skiers and snowboarders. TW burials may have different victim physiology profiles and rescue considerations than avalanche-related burials due to snow density, burial position, and compensatory physiologic responses. This study aimed to compare the physiological responses between avalanche and TW burials through a prospective controlled trial of simulated avalanche burial to simulated TW burial.MethodsEleven volunteers participated in two paired 60-min snow burials: Avalanche and TW simulations, controlling for position and snowpack densities. We monitored core temperature, respiratory rate, minute ventilation, end-tidal carbon dioxide, oxygen saturation, partial pressure of inspired carbon dioxide, and heart rate.ResultsThe average cooling rate for the avalanche simulation was -0.017(Δ°C/min) versus -0.012(Δ°C/min) for the TW simulation (p = 0.014*), 1.42 times faster cooling rate than TW burial. SpO2 decreased 10.9 times faster on average in TW burial than in avalanche conditions when normalized by burial time as a rate (avalanche -0.011 vs TW -0.12 (Δ%/min), p = 0.033*). More participants requested early study termination in the TW scenario.DiscussionSimulated TW burial resulted in a statistically significant slower rate of core temperature cooling and earlier hypoxemia. Inverted body position in TW burials may lead to increased physiologic distress and contribute to earlier hypoxia. These findings may have important implications for search and rescue as well as resuscitation efforts for snow burial victims.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Wilderness & Environmental Medicine
Wilderness & Environmental Medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
96
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Wilderness & Environmental Medicine, the official journal of the Wilderness Medical Society, is the leading journal for physicians practicing medicine in austere environments. This quarterly journal features articles on all aspects of wilderness medicine, including high altitude and climbing, cold- and heat-related phenomena, natural environmental disasters, immersion and near-drowning, diving, and barotrauma, hazardous plants/animals/insects/marine animals, animal attacks, search and rescue, ethical and legal issues, aeromedial transport, survival physiology, medicine in remote environments, travel medicine, operational medicine, and wilderness trauma management. It presents original research and clinical reports from scientists and practitioners around the globe. WEM invites submissions from authors who want to take advantage of our established publication''s unique scope, wide readership, and international recognition in the field of wilderness medicine. Its readership is a diverse group of medical and outdoor professionals who choose WEM as their primary wilderness medical resource.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信