Valerio Santarelli, Fabio Maria Valenzi, Muhannad Aljoulani, Hakan Bahadır Haberal, Luca A Morgantini, Arianna Biasatti, Stefano Salciccia, Giovanni Battista Di Pierro, Giorgio Franco, Riccardo Autorino, Simone Crivellaro
{"title":"单端口机器人辅助腹膜外根治性前列腺切除术的学习曲线:基于cusum的分析。","authors":"Valerio Santarelli, Fabio Maria Valenzi, Muhannad Aljoulani, Hakan Bahadır Haberal, Luca A Morgantini, Arianna Biasatti, Stefano Salciccia, Giovanni Battista Di Pierro, Giorgio Franco, Riccardo Autorino, Simone Crivellaro","doi":"10.1089/lap.2025.0055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Single-port robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (SP-RARP) has been demonstrated to be a feasible and safe procedure. Nonetheless, the challenges of SP surgery could limit the transferability of skills from multi-port (MP) console. The aim of our study was to assess the learning curve of SP-RARP. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> SP-RARPs performed by a single experienced surgeon were reviewed. The surgical learning curve was assessed using risk-adjusted cumulative summation (CUSUM) methodology in terms of operative time, separately for SP-RARPs with pelvic lymphadenectomy (PLND) and without PLND. <b><i>Results:</i></b> 119 extraperitoneal SP-RARPs were evaluated, 83 with PLND and 36 without PLND. After CUSUM calculation, a cubic polynomial regression was performed to plot the learning curves. The inflection points, representing the number of cases required to achieve proficiency, corresponded to the 42<sup>nd</sup> and 20<sup>th</sup> procedure, respectively, for SP-RARP with and without PLND. The learning curves were subsequently divided into a learning phase and a proficiency phase to compare perioperative and postoperative outcomes of the two phases. In both groups, cases in the proficiency phase demonstrated significantly lower median operative times (<i>P</i> = .01 and <i>P</i> < .001) and hospital stays (<i>P</i> = .015 and <i>P</i> = .04). In the SP-RARP without the PLND group, patients in the proficiency phase demonstrated significantly lower postoperative pain scores (<i>P</i> = .04). No differences were found in terms of estimated blood loss, complication rates, and positive surgical margin rates (<i>P</i> > .05). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Results from our analysis suggest that the learning curve of extraperitoneal SP-RARP is not longer than that reported for MP-RARP. Moreover, when cautiously approached, the learning process can be undertaken without compromising safety and oncological outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Learning Curve of Single-Port Robotic-Assisted Extraperitoneal Radical Prostatectomy: A CUSUM-Based Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Valerio Santarelli, Fabio Maria Valenzi, Muhannad Aljoulani, Hakan Bahadır Haberal, Luca A Morgantini, Arianna Biasatti, Stefano Salciccia, Giovanni Battista Di Pierro, Giorgio Franco, Riccardo Autorino, Simone Crivellaro\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/lap.2025.0055\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Single-port robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (SP-RARP) has been demonstrated to be a feasible and safe procedure. Nonetheless, the challenges of SP surgery could limit the transferability of skills from multi-port (MP) console. The aim of our study was to assess the learning curve of SP-RARP. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> SP-RARPs performed by a single experienced surgeon were reviewed. The surgical learning curve was assessed using risk-adjusted cumulative summation (CUSUM) methodology in terms of operative time, separately for SP-RARPs with pelvic lymphadenectomy (PLND) and without PLND. <b><i>Results:</i></b> 119 extraperitoneal SP-RARPs were evaluated, 83 with PLND and 36 without PLND. After CUSUM calculation, a cubic polynomial regression was performed to plot the learning curves. The inflection points, representing the number of cases required to achieve proficiency, corresponded to the 42<sup>nd</sup> and 20<sup>th</sup> procedure, respectively, for SP-RARP with and without PLND. The learning curves were subsequently divided into a learning phase and a proficiency phase to compare perioperative and postoperative outcomes of the two phases. In both groups, cases in the proficiency phase demonstrated significantly lower median operative times (<i>P</i> = .01 and <i>P</i> < .001) and hospital stays (<i>P</i> = .015 and <i>P</i> = .04). In the SP-RARP without the PLND group, patients in the proficiency phase demonstrated significantly lower postoperative pain scores (<i>P</i> = .04). No differences were found in terms of estimated blood loss, complication rates, and positive surgical margin rates (<i>P</i> > .05). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Results from our analysis suggest that the learning curve of extraperitoneal SP-RARP is not longer than that reported for MP-RARP. Moreover, when cautiously approached, the learning process can be undertaken without compromising safety and oncological outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50166,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2025.0055\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2025.0055","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Learning Curve of Single-Port Robotic-Assisted Extraperitoneal Radical Prostatectomy: A CUSUM-Based Analysis.
Background: Single-port robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (SP-RARP) has been demonstrated to be a feasible and safe procedure. Nonetheless, the challenges of SP surgery could limit the transferability of skills from multi-port (MP) console. The aim of our study was to assess the learning curve of SP-RARP. Methods: SP-RARPs performed by a single experienced surgeon were reviewed. The surgical learning curve was assessed using risk-adjusted cumulative summation (CUSUM) methodology in terms of operative time, separately for SP-RARPs with pelvic lymphadenectomy (PLND) and without PLND. Results: 119 extraperitoneal SP-RARPs were evaluated, 83 with PLND and 36 without PLND. After CUSUM calculation, a cubic polynomial regression was performed to plot the learning curves. The inflection points, representing the number of cases required to achieve proficiency, corresponded to the 42nd and 20th procedure, respectively, for SP-RARP with and without PLND. The learning curves were subsequently divided into a learning phase and a proficiency phase to compare perioperative and postoperative outcomes of the two phases. In both groups, cases in the proficiency phase demonstrated significantly lower median operative times (P = .01 and P < .001) and hospital stays (P = .015 and P = .04). In the SP-RARP without the PLND group, patients in the proficiency phase demonstrated significantly lower postoperative pain scores (P = .04). No differences were found in terms of estimated blood loss, complication rates, and positive surgical margin rates (P > .05). Conclusion: Results from our analysis suggest that the learning curve of extraperitoneal SP-RARP is not longer than that reported for MP-RARP. Moreover, when cautiously approached, the learning process can be undertaken without compromising safety and oncological outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques (JLAST) is the leading international peer-reviewed journal for practicing surgeons who want to keep up with the latest thinking and advanced surgical technologies in laparoscopy, endoscopy, NOTES, and robotics. The Journal is ideally suited to surgeons who are early adopters of new technology and techniques. Recognizing that many new technologies and techniques have significant overlap with several surgical specialties, JLAST is the first journal to focus on these topics both in general and pediatric surgery, and includes other surgical subspecialties such as: urology, gynecologic surgery, thoracic surgery, and more.