单端口机器人辅助腹膜外根治性前列腺切除术的学习曲线:基于cusum的分析。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Valerio Santarelli, Fabio Maria Valenzi, Muhannad Aljoulani, Hakan Bahadır Haberal, Luca A Morgantini, Arianna Biasatti, Stefano Salciccia, Giovanni Battista Di Pierro, Giorgio Franco, Riccardo Autorino, Simone Crivellaro
{"title":"单端口机器人辅助腹膜外根治性前列腺切除术的学习曲线:基于cusum的分析。","authors":"Valerio Santarelli, Fabio Maria Valenzi, Muhannad Aljoulani, Hakan Bahadır Haberal, Luca A Morgantini, Arianna Biasatti, Stefano Salciccia, Giovanni Battista Di Pierro, Giorgio Franco, Riccardo Autorino, Simone Crivellaro","doi":"10.1089/lap.2025.0055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Single-port robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (SP-RARP) has been demonstrated to be a feasible and safe procedure. Nonetheless, the challenges of SP surgery could limit the transferability of skills from multi-port (MP) console. The aim of our study was to assess the learning curve of SP-RARP. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> SP-RARPs performed by a single experienced surgeon were reviewed. The surgical learning curve was assessed using risk-adjusted cumulative summation (CUSUM) methodology in terms of operative time, separately for SP-RARPs with pelvic lymphadenectomy (PLND) and without PLND. <b><i>Results:</i></b> 119 extraperitoneal SP-RARPs were evaluated, 83 with PLND and 36 without PLND. After CUSUM calculation, a cubic polynomial regression was performed to plot the learning curves. The inflection points, representing the number of cases required to achieve proficiency, corresponded to the 42<sup>nd</sup> and 20<sup>th</sup> procedure, respectively, for SP-RARP with and without PLND. The learning curves were subsequently divided into a learning phase and a proficiency phase to compare perioperative and postoperative outcomes of the two phases. In both groups, cases in the proficiency phase demonstrated significantly lower median operative times (<i>P</i> = .01 and <i>P</i> < .001) and hospital stays (<i>P</i> = .015 and <i>P</i> = .04). In the SP-RARP without the PLND group, patients in the proficiency phase demonstrated significantly lower postoperative pain scores (<i>P</i> = .04). No differences were found in terms of estimated blood loss, complication rates, and positive surgical margin rates (<i>P</i> > .05). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Results from our analysis suggest that the learning curve of extraperitoneal SP-RARP is not longer than that reported for MP-RARP. Moreover, when cautiously approached, the learning process can be undertaken without compromising safety and oncological outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Learning Curve of Single-Port Robotic-Assisted Extraperitoneal Radical Prostatectomy: A CUSUM-Based Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Valerio Santarelli, Fabio Maria Valenzi, Muhannad Aljoulani, Hakan Bahadır Haberal, Luca A Morgantini, Arianna Biasatti, Stefano Salciccia, Giovanni Battista Di Pierro, Giorgio Franco, Riccardo Autorino, Simone Crivellaro\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/lap.2025.0055\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Single-port robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (SP-RARP) has been demonstrated to be a feasible and safe procedure. Nonetheless, the challenges of SP surgery could limit the transferability of skills from multi-port (MP) console. The aim of our study was to assess the learning curve of SP-RARP. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> SP-RARPs performed by a single experienced surgeon were reviewed. The surgical learning curve was assessed using risk-adjusted cumulative summation (CUSUM) methodology in terms of operative time, separately for SP-RARPs with pelvic lymphadenectomy (PLND) and without PLND. <b><i>Results:</i></b> 119 extraperitoneal SP-RARPs were evaluated, 83 with PLND and 36 without PLND. After CUSUM calculation, a cubic polynomial regression was performed to plot the learning curves. The inflection points, representing the number of cases required to achieve proficiency, corresponded to the 42<sup>nd</sup> and 20<sup>th</sup> procedure, respectively, for SP-RARP with and without PLND. The learning curves were subsequently divided into a learning phase and a proficiency phase to compare perioperative and postoperative outcomes of the two phases. In both groups, cases in the proficiency phase demonstrated significantly lower median operative times (<i>P</i> = .01 and <i>P</i> < .001) and hospital stays (<i>P</i> = .015 and <i>P</i> = .04). In the SP-RARP without the PLND group, patients in the proficiency phase demonstrated significantly lower postoperative pain scores (<i>P</i> = .04). No differences were found in terms of estimated blood loss, complication rates, and positive surgical margin rates (<i>P</i> > .05). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Results from our analysis suggest that the learning curve of extraperitoneal SP-RARP is not longer than that reported for MP-RARP. Moreover, when cautiously approached, the learning process can be undertaken without compromising safety and oncological outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50166,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2025.0055\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2025.0055","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:单端口机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(SP-RARP)已被证明是一种可行且安全的手术。尽管如此,SP手术的挑战可能会限制多端口(MP)控制台技能的可转移性。本研究的目的是评估SP-RARP的学习曲线。方法:回顾一名经验丰富的外科医生实施的SP-RARPs。根据手术时间,采用风险调整累积和(CUSUM)方法评估sp - rarp伴盆腔淋巴结切除术(PLND)和不伴盆腔淋巴结切除术的手术学习曲线。结果:对119例腹腔外sp - rarp进行了评估,其中83例合并PLND, 36例未合并PLND。经过CUSUM计算后,进行三次多项式回归绘制学习曲线。拐点代表达到熟练程度所需的病例数,分别对应于有PLND和没有PLND的SP-RARP的第42和第20个程序。随后将学习曲线分为学习阶段和熟练阶段,比较两阶段的围手术期和术后结果。两组熟练期患者的中位手术时间(P = 0.01和P < 0.001)和住院时间(P = 0.015和P = 0.04)均显著降低。在没有PLND的SP-RARP组中,熟练期患者的术后疼痛评分明显降低(P = 0.04)。在估计失血量、并发症发生率和阳性手术切缘率方面没有发现差异(P < 0.05)。结论:我们的分析结果表明,腹膜外SP-RARP的学习曲线并不比MP-RARP的学习曲线长。此外,如果谨慎对待,学习过程可以在不影响安全性和肿瘤结果的情况下进行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Learning Curve of Single-Port Robotic-Assisted Extraperitoneal Radical Prostatectomy: A CUSUM-Based Analysis.

Background: Single-port robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (SP-RARP) has been demonstrated to be a feasible and safe procedure. Nonetheless, the challenges of SP surgery could limit the transferability of skills from multi-port (MP) console. The aim of our study was to assess the learning curve of SP-RARP. Methods: SP-RARPs performed by a single experienced surgeon were reviewed. The surgical learning curve was assessed using risk-adjusted cumulative summation (CUSUM) methodology in terms of operative time, separately for SP-RARPs with pelvic lymphadenectomy (PLND) and without PLND. Results: 119 extraperitoneal SP-RARPs were evaluated, 83 with PLND and 36 without PLND. After CUSUM calculation, a cubic polynomial regression was performed to plot the learning curves. The inflection points, representing the number of cases required to achieve proficiency, corresponded to the 42nd and 20th procedure, respectively, for SP-RARP with and without PLND. The learning curves were subsequently divided into a learning phase and a proficiency phase to compare perioperative and postoperative outcomes of the two phases. In both groups, cases in the proficiency phase demonstrated significantly lower median operative times (P = .01 and P < .001) and hospital stays (P = .015 and P = .04). In the SP-RARP without the PLND group, patients in the proficiency phase demonstrated significantly lower postoperative pain scores (P = .04). No differences were found in terms of estimated blood loss, complication rates, and positive surgical margin rates (P > .05). Conclusion: Results from our analysis suggest that the learning curve of extraperitoneal SP-RARP is not longer than that reported for MP-RARP. Moreover, when cautiously approached, the learning process can be undertaken without compromising safety and oncological outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
163
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques (JLAST) is the leading international peer-reviewed journal for practicing surgeons who want to keep up with the latest thinking and advanced surgical technologies in laparoscopy, endoscopy, NOTES, and robotics. The Journal is ideally suited to surgeons who are early adopters of new technology and techniques. Recognizing that many new technologies and techniques have significant overlap with several surgical specialties, JLAST is the first journal to focus on these topics both in general and pediatric surgery, and includes other surgical subspecialties such as: urology, gynecologic surgery, thoracic surgery, and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信