{"title":"视觉空间注意、时间约束和代理感。","authors":"Zongze Chen, Xueqi Low, Patrick Haggard, Liyu Cao","doi":"10.1037/xhp0001339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>For over a century, subjective timing judgement has been studied by timing events with respect to a rotating clock. Participants watched a rapidly rotating clock hand and reported the time of a designated event (e.g., a sound) by giving the clock hand position. However, the distribution of visual attention around the clock has been suggested as a key factor influencing the \"time\" report. Specifically, if visual attention is future oriented (ahead of the clock hand position at the time of event occurrence), the reported location is delayed relative to the actual location. Conversely, past-oriented visual attention will masquerade as an advance of subjective timing. Thus, a change in the distribution of visuospatial attention could contribute to the difference in timing reports as found in temporal binding. The present study experimentally manipulated the distribution of visuospatial attention to shift toward either past or future locations of the clock hand. Successful manipulations of attention shift indeed led to predicted directional changes in timing reports, which were associated with corresponding directional changes in temporal binding. Similar manipulations that did not lead to attention changes were not associated with any changes in temporal binding. Furthermore, the attention account was extended to causal binding by a machine action, without any human voluntary component, suggesting that the interaction between attention and timing judgement is domain general and independent of mechanisms specific of intentional action. Therefore, the current study demonstrated an attention component in timing reports. Attention should be considered when interpreting the timing results obtained with the clock method. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50195,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Visuospatial attention, temporal binding, and sense of agency.\",\"authors\":\"Zongze Chen, Xueqi Low, Patrick Haggard, Liyu Cao\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/xhp0001339\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>For over a century, subjective timing judgement has been studied by timing events with respect to a rotating clock. Participants watched a rapidly rotating clock hand and reported the time of a designated event (e.g., a sound) by giving the clock hand position. However, the distribution of visual attention around the clock has been suggested as a key factor influencing the \\\"time\\\" report. Specifically, if visual attention is future oriented (ahead of the clock hand position at the time of event occurrence), the reported location is delayed relative to the actual location. Conversely, past-oriented visual attention will masquerade as an advance of subjective timing. Thus, a change in the distribution of visuospatial attention could contribute to the difference in timing reports as found in temporal binding. The present study experimentally manipulated the distribution of visuospatial attention to shift toward either past or future locations of the clock hand. Successful manipulations of attention shift indeed led to predicted directional changes in timing reports, which were associated with corresponding directional changes in temporal binding. Similar manipulations that did not lead to attention changes were not associated with any changes in temporal binding. Furthermore, the attention account was extended to causal binding by a machine action, without any human voluntary component, suggesting that the interaction between attention and timing judgement is domain general and independent of mechanisms specific of intentional action. Therefore, the current study demonstrated an attention component in timing reports. Attention should be considered when interpreting the timing results obtained with the clock method. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50195,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0001339\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0001339","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
一个多世纪以来,人们一直通过旋转时钟对事件进行计时来研究主观计时判断。参与者观看一个快速旋转的时钟指针,并通过给出时钟指针的位置来报告指定事件的时间(例如,声音)。然而,视觉注意力在全天的分布被认为是影响“时间”报告的关键因素。具体来说,如果视觉注意力是面向未来的(在事件发生时,在时钟指针的位置之前),那么报告的位置相对于实际位置是延迟的。相反,以过去为导向的视觉注意会伪装成主观时间的提前。因此,视觉空间注意力分布的变化可能导致时间约束中发现的时间报告的差异。本研究通过实验操纵视觉空间注意力的分布,使其转向时钟指针的过去或未来位置。注意转移的成功操纵确实导致了预测的时间报告的方向性变化,这与相应的时间约束的方向性变化有关。没有导致注意力变化的类似操作与时间绑定的任何变化无关。此外,注意解释被扩展到机器行为的因果约束,没有任何人类自愿成分,这表明注意和时间判断之间的相互作用是普遍的,独立于有意行为的特定机制。因此,本研究证明了时间报告中存在注意成分。在解释用时钟方法获得的计时结果时,应考虑注意。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
Visuospatial attention, temporal binding, and sense of agency.
For over a century, subjective timing judgement has been studied by timing events with respect to a rotating clock. Participants watched a rapidly rotating clock hand and reported the time of a designated event (e.g., a sound) by giving the clock hand position. However, the distribution of visual attention around the clock has been suggested as a key factor influencing the "time" report. Specifically, if visual attention is future oriented (ahead of the clock hand position at the time of event occurrence), the reported location is delayed relative to the actual location. Conversely, past-oriented visual attention will masquerade as an advance of subjective timing. Thus, a change in the distribution of visuospatial attention could contribute to the difference in timing reports as found in temporal binding. The present study experimentally manipulated the distribution of visuospatial attention to shift toward either past or future locations of the clock hand. Successful manipulations of attention shift indeed led to predicted directional changes in timing reports, which were associated with corresponding directional changes in temporal binding. Similar manipulations that did not lead to attention changes were not associated with any changes in temporal binding. Furthermore, the attention account was extended to causal binding by a machine action, without any human voluntary component, suggesting that the interaction between attention and timing judgement is domain general and independent of mechanisms specific of intentional action. Therefore, the current study demonstrated an attention component in timing reports. Attention should be considered when interpreting the timing results obtained with the clock method. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance publishes studies on perception, control of action, perceptual aspects of language processing, and related cognitive processes.