测量加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省酷儿、跨性别青年妇女和非二元青年中亲密伴侣暴力和关系公平的建议。

IF 2.4 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Kalysha Closson, Tadiwa Nemutambwe, Zoë Osborne, Gem Y Lee, Colby Hangle, Stevie Thompson, Anita Raj, Angela Kaida
{"title":"测量加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省酷儿、跨性别青年妇女和非二元青年中亲密伴侣暴力和关系公平的建议。","authors":"Kalysha Closson, Tadiwa Nemutambwe, Zoë Osborne, Gem Y Lee, Colby Hangle, Stevie Thompson, Anita Raj, Angela Kaida","doi":"10.1080/00918369.2025.2500987","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Extensive research documents the negative impacts of inequitable intimate relationship power dynamics on gender equity for cisgender, heterosexual women. However, limited research has explored this issue among queer and trans young women and non-binary youth aged 16-29, partly due to inadequate measurement tools. We aimed to (1) explore youth perceptions of existing scales that measure gender and relationship equity; and (2) develop recommendations for adapting and developing such measures for use among queer, trans, and non-monogamous young women and non-binary youth. Thirty youth (14 [46.7%] women [inclusive of transgender women] and 16 [53.3%] non-binary) aged 17-29 in a current (<i>n</i> = 23 [76.6%]) or recent (in past year, <i>n</i> = 7 [23.4%]) queer relationships and residing in British Columbia, Canada, completed qualitative cognitive interviews between August and November 2022. Scales assessed failed to acknowledge diverse relationship experiences, were at times hurtful, and lacked applicability depending on youth access needs, sexual orientation, gender, and relationship type. Youth highlighted that diversity and representation matter and recommended that future measures of relationship power should capture financial equity, shared responsibility, and emotional labor. To track and advance gender equity, existing scales must be adapted to be inclusive of queer, trans, and non-monogamous youth relationship dynamics.</p>","PeriodicalId":48221,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Homosexuality","volume":" ","pages":"1-26"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recommendations for Measuring Intimate Partner Violence and Relationship Equity Among Queer and Trans Young Women and Non-Binary Youth in British Columbia Canada.\",\"authors\":\"Kalysha Closson, Tadiwa Nemutambwe, Zoë Osborne, Gem Y Lee, Colby Hangle, Stevie Thompson, Anita Raj, Angela Kaida\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00918369.2025.2500987\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Extensive research documents the negative impacts of inequitable intimate relationship power dynamics on gender equity for cisgender, heterosexual women. However, limited research has explored this issue among queer and trans young women and non-binary youth aged 16-29, partly due to inadequate measurement tools. We aimed to (1) explore youth perceptions of existing scales that measure gender and relationship equity; and (2) develop recommendations for adapting and developing such measures for use among queer, trans, and non-monogamous young women and non-binary youth. Thirty youth (14 [46.7%] women [inclusive of transgender women] and 16 [53.3%] non-binary) aged 17-29 in a current (<i>n</i> = 23 [76.6%]) or recent (in past year, <i>n</i> = 7 [23.4%]) queer relationships and residing in British Columbia, Canada, completed qualitative cognitive interviews between August and November 2022. Scales assessed failed to acknowledge diverse relationship experiences, were at times hurtful, and lacked applicability depending on youth access needs, sexual orientation, gender, and relationship type. Youth highlighted that diversity and representation matter and recommended that future measures of relationship power should capture financial equity, shared responsibility, and emotional labor. To track and advance gender equity, existing scales must be adapted to be inclusive of queer, trans, and non-monogamous youth relationship dynamics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48221,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Homosexuality\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-26\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Homosexuality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2025.2500987\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Homosexuality","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2025.2500987","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大量研究记录了不平等的亲密关系权力动态对异性恋女性性别平等的负面影响。然而,在16-29岁的酷儿和跨性别年轻女性以及非二元青年中对这一问题的研究有限,部分原因是测量工具不完善。我们的目的是(1)探索年轻人对现有衡量性别和关系公平的量表的看法;(2)针对酷儿、跨性别、非一夫一妻制的年轻女性和非双性恋青年提出调整和发展这些措施的建议。在2022年8月至11月期间,30名居住在加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省,年龄在17-29岁,目前(n = 23[76.6%])或最近(n = 7[23.4%])有酷儿关系的青年(14[46.7%]名女性[包括跨性别女性]和16[53.3%]名非二元性别)完成了定性认知访谈。评估的量表未能承认不同的关系经历,有时是有害的,并且缺乏适用性,这取决于青少年的访问需求,性取向,性别和关系类型。青年强调了多样性和代表性的重要性,并建议未来衡量关系权力的标准应该包括财务公平、共同责任和情感劳动。为了追踪和促进性别平等,现有的量表必须适应酷儿、跨性别和非一夫一妻制的青年关系动态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Recommendations for Measuring Intimate Partner Violence and Relationship Equity Among Queer and Trans Young Women and Non-Binary Youth in British Columbia Canada.

Extensive research documents the negative impacts of inequitable intimate relationship power dynamics on gender equity for cisgender, heterosexual women. However, limited research has explored this issue among queer and trans young women and non-binary youth aged 16-29, partly due to inadequate measurement tools. We aimed to (1) explore youth perceptions of existing scales that measure gender and relationship equity; and (2) develop recommendations for adapting and developing such measures for use among queer, trans, and non-monogamous young women and non-binary youth. Thirty youth (14 [46.7%] women [inclusive of transgender women] and 16 [53.3%] non-binary) aged 17-29 in a current (n = 23 [76.6%]) or recent (in past year, n = 7 [23.4%]) queer relationships and residing in British Columbia, Canada, completed qualitative cognitive interviews between August and November 2022. Scales assessed failed to acknowledge diverse relationship experiences, were at times hurtful, and lacked applicability depending on youth access needs, sexual orientation, gender, and relationship type. Youth highlighted that diversity and representation matter and recommended that future measures of relationship power should capture financial equity, shared responsibility, and emotional labor. To track and advance gender equity, existing scales must be adapted to be inclusive of queer, trans, and non-monogamous youth relationship dynamics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
164
期刊介绍: The Journal of Homosexuality is an internationally acclaimed, peer-reviewed publication devoted to publishing a wide variety of disciplinary and interdisciplinary scholarship to foster a thorough understanding of the complexities, nuances, and the multifaceted aspects of sexuality and gender. The chief aim of the journal is to publish thought-provoking scholarship by researchers, community activists, and scholars who employ a range of research methodologies and who offer a variety of perspectives to continue shaping knowledge production in the arenas of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender (LGBT) studies and queer studies. The Journal of Homosexuality is committed to offering substantive, accessible reading to researchers and general readers alike in the hope of: spurring additional research, offering ideas to integrate into educational programs at schools, colleges & universities, or community-based organizations, and manifesting activism against sexual and gender prejudice (e.g., homophobia, biphobia and transphobia), including the promotion of sexual and gender justice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信