{"title":"腕管综合征患者疼痛灾难化量表的特征-项目反应理论分析。","authors":"Mikhail Saltychev, Annika Miikkulainen, Hanna-Stiina Taskinen","doi":"10.1515/sjpain-2024-0079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the psychometric properties of pain catastrophizing scale (PCS) using item response theory (IRT) amongst people with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective cross-sectional register-based study amongst 1,597 patients with CTS. Two-parameter IRT analysis with rating scale model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average age was 55.3 (16.3) years and 896 (56%) were women. The average PCS total score was 15.1 (11.6) points. For all 13 items, the estimates of difficulty parameter indicated a shift towards higher PCS scores. This was also seen in item characteristic curves and item information function. Respectively, the entire composite score showed the same shift towards higher PCS scores. The discrimination of PCS was excellent 1.98 (95% CI 1.89-2.07).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, the psychometric properties of the PCS were found to be sufficiently good to recommend this scale for clinical use in CTS. The PCS is well able to distinguish between people with different levels of pain catastrophizing, even if performing better in elevated levels of catastrophizing. Also, the respondents may have a slight tendency to underestimate the severity of their catastrophizing when responding to the PCS. The results may be of interest to both clinicians and researchers in planning and implementing conservative or operative treatment for CTS, setting rehabilitation goals, and evaluating treatment or rehabilitation outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":47407,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Pain","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Properties of pain catastrophizing scale amongst patients with carpal tunnel syndrome - Item response theory analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Mikhail Saltychev, Annika Miikkulainen, Hanna-Stiina Taskinen\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/sjpain-2024-0079\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the psychometric properties of pain catastrophizing scale (PCS) using item response theory (IRT) amongst people with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective cross-sectional register-based study amongst 1,597 patients with CTS. Two-parameter IRT analysis with rating scale model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average age was 55.3 (16.3) years and 896 (56%) were women. The average PCS total score was 15.1 (11.6) points. For all 13 items, the estimates of difficulty parameter indicated a shift towards higher PCS scores. This was also seen in item characteristic curves and item information function. Respectively, the entire composite score showed the same shift towards higher PCS scores. The discrimination of PCS was excellent 1.98 (95% CI 1.89-2.07).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, the psychometric properties of the PCS were found to be sufficiently good to recommend this scale for clinical use in CTS. The PCS is well able to distinguish between people with different levels of pain catastrophizing, even if performing better in elevated levels of catastrophizing. Also, the respondents may have a slight tendency to underestimate the severity of their catastrophizing when responding to the PCS. The results may be of interest to both clinicians and researchers in planning and implementing conservative or operative treatment for CTS, setting rehabilitation goals, and evaluating treatment or rehabilitation outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47407,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Pain\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Pain\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/sjpain-2024-0079\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/sjpain-2024-0079","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:应用项目反应理论(IRT)评价腕管综合征(CTS)患者疼痛灾难化量表(PCS)的心理测量特性。方法:对1597例CTS患者进行回顾性横断面登记研究。评定量表模型的双参数IRT分析。结果:平均年龄55.3岁(16.3岁),女性896例(56%)。PCS总分平均为15.1分(11.6分)。对于所有13个项目,难度参数的估计表明向更高的PCS分数的转变。这在物品特征曲线和物品信息函数中也可以看到。分别,整个综合得分也显示出同样的向更高的PCS得分的转变。PCS的鉴别率为1.98 (95% CI 1.89 ~ 2.07)。结论:总体而言,PCS的心理测量特性足够好,推荐该量表用于CTS的临床应用。PCS能够很好地区分不同痛苦灾难化程度的人,即使在灾难化程度较高的情况下表现更好。此外,受访者可能有轻微的倾向,低估了他们的灾变的严重程度,当回应个人电脑。这些结果可能对临床医生和研究人员计划和实施CTS的保守或手术治疗,设定康复目标以及评估治疗或康复结果感兴趣。
Properties of pain catastrophizing scale amongst patients with carpal tunnel syndrome - Item response theory analysis.
Objectives: To evaluate the psychometric properties of pain catastrophizing scale (PCS) using item response theory (IRT) amongst people with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS).
Methods: Retrospective cross-sectional register-based study amongst 1,597 patients with CTS. Two-parameter IRT analysis with rating scale model.
Results: The average age was 55.3 (16.3) years and 896 (56%) were women. The average PCS total score was 15.1 (11.6) points. For all 13 items, the estimates of difficulty parameter indicated a shift towards higher PCS scores. This was also seen in item characteristic curves and item information function. Respectively, the entire composite score showed the same shift towards higher PCS scores. The discrimination of PCS was excellent 1.98 (95% CI 1.89-2.07).
Conclusions: Overall, the psychometric properties of the PCS were found to be sufficiently good to recommend this scale for clinical use in CTS. The PCS is well able to distinguish between people with different levels of pain catastrophizing, even if performing better in elevated levels of catastrophizing. Also, the respondents may have a slight tendency to underestimate the severity of their catastrophizing when responding to the PCS. The results may be of interest to both clinicians and researchers in planning and implementing conservative or operative treatment for CTS, setting rehabilitation goals, and evaluating treatment or rehabilitation outcomes.