{"title":"印度、巴基斯坦和孟加拉国初级保健的公私伙伴关系:途径和驱动因素的经验教训。","authors":"Shehla Zaidi, A Venkat Raman, Mahbub Elahi Chowdhury, Farooq Azam, Priya Balasubramanium","doi":"10.1002/hpm.3947","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Formalised public-private-partnerships (PPPs) for primary care have proliferated in the mixed health systems of India, Pakistan and Bangladesh, managed and funded by the state. This perspective provides a process-based understanding of pathways adopted by home-grown PPPs and underlying drivers to identify lessons for advancement under Universal Health Coverage (UHC). PPPs have been deployed to respond to local primary care needs ranging from diagnostic screening, maternity services, management of government health centres, mobile clinics to urban primary care systems. Partnerships have evolved to include a diverse range of private partners and more purposeful arrangements, with increase in service volumes, innovations albeit less standardised quality of care. The pathway of PPP instigation, rollout and sustaining in South Asia is based on local starting points by sub-national governments, diffusion of practice across states, common interests and shared bureaucratic coalitions. Success drivers include administrative support beyond the health sector, simplified contractual and payment systems providing operational ease and decision space, and the use of relational management and digital monitoring for resolving issues. However, PPPs are constrained by either too little accountability or excessive accountability in contract design, trust deficits between private and government, and fire-walled PPP implementation creates disconnects from national primary care planning and regulation. Donor supported projectized PPP funding and accompanying rules of business makes PPPs implementation more cumbersome. We conclude that future attention must centrally focus on pathways and drivers to impactfully introduce, scale-up and sustain PPPs in South Asia. Emphasis must be on pathways that build on local simplified ideation, progressive adaptation and allowing contextual diversity under a larger UHC planning architecture, as opposed to centralised one-fit and heavily technocratic initiatives. Success drivers must feature in design of PPP initiatives. Furthermore, we contend that international donor assistance should shift from projectized support for PPPs to building public sector competencies for stewardship, private sector engagement skills as well as the more traditional performance management capacity.</p>","PeriodicalId":47637,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Health Planning and Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Public-Private-Partnerships for Primary Care in India, Pakistan and Bangladesh: Lessons on Pathways and Drivers.\",\"authors\":\"Shehla Zaidi, A Venkat Raman, Mahbub Elahi Chowdhury, Farooq Azam, Priya Balasubramanium\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hpm.3947\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Formalised public-private-partnerships (PPPs) for primary care have proliferated in the mixed health systems of India, Pakistan and Bangladesh, managed and funded by the state. This perspective provides a process-based understanding of pathways adopted by home-grown PPPs and underlying drivers to identify lessons for advancement under Universal Health Coverage (UHC). PPPs have been deployed to respond to local primary care needs ranging from diagnostic screening, maternity services, management of government health centres, mobile clinics to urban primary care systems. Partnerships have evolved to include a diverse range of private partners and more purposeful arrangements, with increase in service volumes, innovations albeit less standardised quality of care. The pathway of PPP instigation, rollout and sustaining in South Asia is based on local starting points by sub-national governments, diffusion of practice across states, common interests and shared bureaucratic coalitions. Success drivers include administrative support beyond the health sector, simplified contractual and payment systems providing operational ease and decision space, and the use of relational management and digital monitoring for resolving issues. However, PPPs are constrained by either too little accountability or excessive accountability in contract design, trust deficits between private and government, and fire-walled PPP implementation creates disconnects from national primary care planning and regulation. Donor supported projectized PPP funding and accompanying rules of business makes PPPs implementation more cumbersome. We conclude that future attention must centrally focus on pathways and drivers to impactfully introduce, scale-up and sustain PPPs in South Asia. Emphasis must be on pathways that build on local simplified ideation, progressive adaptation and allowing contextual diversity under a larger UHC planning architecture, as opposed to centralised one-fit and heavily technocratic initiatives. Success drivers must feature in design of PPP initiatives. Furthermore, we contend that international donor assistance should shift from projectized support for PPPs to building public sector competencies for stewardship, private sector engagement skills as well as the more traditional performance management capacity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47637,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Health Planning and Management\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Health Planning and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.3947\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Health Planning and Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.3947","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Public-Private-Partnerships for Primary Care in India, Pakistan and Bangladesh: Lessons on Pathways and Drivers.
Formalised public-private-partnerships (PPPs) for primary care have proliferated in the mixed health systems of India, Pakistan and Bangladesh, managed and funded by the state. This perspective provides a process-based understanding of pathways adopted by home-grown PPPs and underlying drivers to identify lessons for advancement under Universal Health Coverage (UHC). PPPs have been deployed to respond to local primary care needs ranging from diagnostic screening, maternity services, management of government health centres, mobile clinics to urban primary care systems. Partnerships have evolved to include a diverse range of private partners and more purposeful arrangements, with increase in service volumes, innovations albeit less standardised quality of care. The pathway of PPP instigation, rollout and sustaining in South Asia is based on local starting points by sub-national governments, diffusion of practice across states, common interests and shared bureaucratic coalitions. Success drivers include administrative support beyond the health sector, simplified contractual and payment systems providing operational ease and decision space, and the use of relational management and digital monitoring for resolving issues. However, PPPs are constrained by either too little accountability or excessive accountability in contract design, trust deficits between private and government, and fire-walled PPP implementation creates disconnects from national primary care planning and regulation. Donor supported projectized PPP funding and accompanying rules of business makes PPPs implementation more cumbersome. We conclude that future attention must centrally focus on pathways and drivers to impactfully introduce, scale-up and sustain PPPs in South Asia. Emphasis must be on pathways that build on local simplified ideation, progressive adaptation and allowing contextual diversity under a larger UHC planning architecture, as opposed to centralised one-fit and heavily technocratic initiatives. Success drivers must feature in design of PPP initiatives. Furthermore, we contend that international donor assistance should shift from projectized support for PPPs to building public sector competencies for stewardship, private sector engagement skills as well as the more traditional performance management capacity.
期刊介绍:
Policy making and implementation, planning and management are widely recognized as central to effective health systems and services and to better health. Globalization, and the economic circumstances facing groups of countries worldwide, meanwhile present a great challenge for health planning and management. The aim of this quarterly journal is to offer a forum for publications which direct attention to major issues in health policy, planning and management. The intention is to maintain a balance between theory and practice, from a variety of disciplines, fields and perspectives. The Journal is explicitly international and multidisciplinary in scope and appeal: articles about policy, planning and management in countries at various stages of political, social, cultural and economic development are welcomed, as are those directed at the different levels (national, regional, local) of the health sector. Manuscripts are invited from a spectrum of different disciplines e.g., (the social sciences, management and medicine) as long as they advance our knowledge and understanding of the health sector. The Journal is therefore global, and eclectic.