印度、巴基斯坦和孟加拉国初级保健的公私伙伴关系:途径和驱动因素的经验教训。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Shehla Zaidi, A Venkat Raman, Mahbub Elahi Chowdhury, Farooq Azam, Priya Balasubramanium
{"title":"印度、巴基斯坦和孟加拉国初级保健的公私伙伴关系:途径和驱动因素的经验教训。","authors":"Shehla Zaidi, A Venkat Raman, Mahbub Elahi Chowdhury, Farooq Azam, Priya Balasubramanium","doi":"10.1002/hpm.3947","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Formalised public-private-partnerships (PPPs) for primary care have proliferated in the mixed health systems of India, Pakistan and Bangladesh, managed and funded by the state. This perspective provides a process-based understanding of pathways adopted by home-grown PPPs and underlying drivers to identify lessons for advancement under Universal Health Coverage (UHC). PPPs have been deployed to respond to local primary care needs ranging from diagnostic screening, maternity services, management of government health centres, mobile clinics to urban primary care systems. Partnerships have evolved to include a diverse range of private partners and more purposeful arrangements, with increase in service volumes, innovations albeit less standardised quality of care. The pathway of PPP instigation, rollout and sustaining in South Asia is based on local starting points by sub-national governments, diffusion of practice across states, common interests and shared bureaucratic coalitions. Success drivers include administrative support beyond the health sector, simplified contractual and payment systems providing operational ease and decision space, and the use of relational management and digital monitoring for resolving issues. However, PPPs are constrained by either too little accountability or excessive accountability in contract design, trust deficits between private and government, and fire-walled PPP implementation creates disconnects from national primary care planning and regulation. Donor supported projectized PPP funding and accompanying rules of business makes PPPs implementation more cumbersome. We conclude that future attention must centrally focus on pathways and drivers to impactfully introduce, scale-up and sustain PPPs in South Asia. Emphasis must be on pathways that build on local simplified ideation, progressive adaptation and allowing contextual diversity under a larger UHC planning architecture, as opposed to centralised one-fit and heavily technocratic initiatives. Success drivers must feature in design of PPP initiatives. Furthermore, we contend that international donor assistance should shift from projectized support for PPPs to building public sector competencies for stewardship, private sector engagement skills as well as the more traditional performance management capacity.</p>","PeriodicalId":47637,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Health Planning and Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Public-Private-Partnerships for Primary Care in India, Pakistan and Bangladesh: Lessons on Pathways and Drivers.\",\"authors\":\"Shehla Zaidi, A Venkat Raman, Mahbub Elahi Chowdhury, Farooq Azam, Priya Balasubramanium\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hpm.3947\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Formalised public-private-partnerships (PPPs) for primary care have proliferated in the mixed health systems of India, Pakistan and Bangladesh, managed and funded by the state. This perspective provides a process-based understanding of pathways adopted by home-grown PPPs and underlying drivers to identify lessons for advancement under Universal Health Coverage (UHC). PPPs have been deployed to respond to local primary care needs ranging from diagnostic screening, maternity services, management of government health centres, mobile clinics to urban primary care systems. Partnerships have evolved to include a diverse range of private partners and more purposeful arrangements, with increase in service volumes, innovations albeit less standardised quality of care. The pathway of PPP instigation, rollout and sustaining in South Asia is based on local starting points by sub-national governments, diffusion of practice across states, common interests and shared bureaucratic coalitions. Success drivers include administrative support beyond the health sector, simplified contractual and payment systems providing operational ease and decision space, and the use of relational management and digital monitoring for resolving issues. However, PPPs are constrained by either too little accountability or excessive accountability in contract design, trust deficits between private and government, and fire-walled PPP implementation creates disconnects from national primary care planning and regulation. Donor supported projectized PPP funding and accompanying rules of business makes PPPs implementation more cumbersome. We conclude that future attention must centrally focus on pathways and drivers to impactfully introduce, scale-up and sustain PPPs in South Asia. Emphasis must be on pathways that build on local simplified ideation, progressive adaptation and allowing contextual diversity under a larger UHC planning architecture, as opposed to centralised one-fit and heavily technocratic initiatives. Success drivers must feature in design of PPP initiatives. Furthermore, we contend that international donor assistance should shift from projectized support for PPPs to building public sector competencies for stewardship, private sector engagement skills as well as the more traditional performance management capacity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47637,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Health Planning and Management\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Health Planning and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.3947\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Health Planning and Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.3947","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在印度、巴基斯坦和孟加拉国由国家管理和资助的混合卫生系统中,初级保健的正式公私伙伴关系(PPPs)已经大量出现。这一视角提供了对本土ppp采用的途径和潜在驱动因素的基于过程的理解,以确定全民健康覆盖(UHC)下的进步经验。已部署公私合作伙伴关系,以满足地方初级保健的需要,从诊断检查、产妇服务、政府保健中心的管理、流动诊所到城市初级保健系统。伙伴关系已经发展为包括各种各样的私人伙伴和更有目的性的安排,服务量增加,创新,尽管标准化的护理质量有所降低。PPP在南亚的启动、推广和维持途径是基于地方政府的地方起点、跨邦实践的传播、共同利益和共同的官僚联盟。成功的驱动因素包括卫生部门以外的行政支持、简化的合同和支付系统,提供操作便利性和决策空间,以及利用关系管理和数字监测来解决问题。然而,PPP受到合同设计问责过少或问责过度的限制,私人和政府之间的信任赤字,以及防火墙PPP实施导致与国家初级保健计划和监管脱节。捐助者支持的PPP项目资金和伴随的商业规则使得PPP的实施更加繁琐。我们的结论是,未来的注意力必须集中在有效地在南亚引入、扩大和维持公私伙伴关系的途径和驱动因素上。必须强调在更大的全民健康覆盖规划架构下,建立在当地简化构思、逐步适应和允许环境多样性的途径,而不是集中的一体机和严重的技术官僚倡议。成功的驱动因素必须体现在PPP计划的设计中。此外,我们认为,国际捐助者的援助应从对公私合作伙伴关系的专项支持转向建设公共部门的管理能力、私营部门的参与技能以及更传统的绩效管理能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Public-Private-Partnerships for Primary Care in India, Pakistan and Bangladesh: Lessons on Pathways and Drivers.

Formalised public-private-partnerships (PPPs) for primary care have proliferated in the mixed health systems of India, Pakistan and Bangladesh, managed and funded by the state. This perspective provides a process-based understanding of pathways adopted by home-grown PPPs and underlying drivers to identify lessons for advancement under Universal Health Coverage (UHC). PPPs have been deployed to respond to local primary care needs ranging from diagnostic screening, maternity services, management of government health centres, mobile clinics to urban primary care systems. Partnerships have evolved to include a diverse range of private partners and more purposeful arrangements, with increase in service volumes, innovations albeit less standardised quality of care. The pathway of PPP instigation, rollout and sustaining in South Asia is based on local starting points by sub-national governments, diffusion of practice across states, common interests and shared bureaucratic coalitions. Success drivers include administrative support beyond the health sector, simplified contractual and payment systems providing operational ease and decision space, and the use of relational management and digital monitoring for resolving issues. However, PPPs are constrained by either too little accountability or excessive accountability in contract design, trust deficits between private and government, and fire-walled PPP implementation creates disconnects from national primary care planning and regulation. Donor supported projectized PPP funding and accompanying rules of business makes PPPs implementation more cumbersome. We conclude that future attention must centrally focus on pathways and drivers to impactfully introduce, scale-up and sustain PPPs in South Asia. Emphasis must be on pathways that build on local simplified ideation, progressive adaptation and allowing contextual diversity under a larger UHC planning architecture, as opposed to centralised one-fit and heavily technocratic initiatives. Success drivers must feature in design of PPP initiatives. Furthermore, we contend that international donor assistance should shift from projectized support for PPPs to building public sector competencies for stewardship, private sector engagement skills as well as the more traditional performance management capacity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
197
期刊介绍: Policy making and implementation, planning and management are widely recognized as central to effective health systems and services and to better health. Globalization, and the economic circumstances facing groups of countries worldwide, meanwhile present a great challenge for health planning and management. The aim of this quarterly journal is to offer a forum for publications which direct attention to major issues in health policy, planning and management. The intention is to maintain a balance between theory and practice, from a variety of disciplines, fields and perspectives. The Journal is explicitly international and multidisciplinary in scope and appeal: articles about policy, planning and management in countries at various stages of political, social, cultural and economic development are welcomed, as are those directed at the different levels (national, regional, local) of the health sector. Manuscripts are invited from a spectrum of different disciplines e.g., (the social sciences, management and medicine) as long as they advance our knowledge and understanding of the health sector. The Journal is therefore global, and eclectic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信