抗甲状腺药物与放射性碘治疗小儿Graves病的比较:文献综述。

IF 1.9 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Akshat Sinha, Reuben Oza, Brandon Karamveer Sangha, Arshia Akhavan-Mofrad, Arvin Suddhi
{"title":"抗甲状腺药物与放射性碘治疗小儿Graves病的比较:文献综述。","authors":"Akshat Sinha, Reuben Oza, Brandon Karamveer Sangha, Arshia Akhavan-Mofrad, Arvin Suddhi","doi":"10.1186/s13044-025-00238-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Paediatric Graves' disease (PGD) is an autoimmune condition, which if left untreated, can result in cardiac complications. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) Guidance (NG145) advocates the use of antithyroid drugs (ATD) as first-line therapy for PGD, with a consultation to consider a move to definitive therapy in the form of radioactive iodine (RAI) or thyroidectomy if the initial 2-year course failed to achieve normal thyroid function. We aim to evaluate the effectiveness, adverse events, and potential predictors of remission for ATD and RAI in treating PGD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A thorough guideline search of NICE Evidence and Royal College of Physicians (RCP) guidelines and policy was conducted to yield a guideline relevant to our review question. A literature search of the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE and PubMed, alongside a clear inclusion and exclusion criteria was utilised to generate systematic reviews and primary literature exploring the efficacy and adverse effects (AEs) of ATD and RAI. Our guideline, systematic reviews and primary literature were appraised using AGREE-II, AMSTAR 2 and CASP respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search strategy yielded one NICE guideline (NG145) published in November 2019, two systematic reviews published after November 2019 and four primary studies, published after the most recent systematic review (August 2020). All studies concluded that ATD and RAI are effective treatment options for PGD. With regards to AEs, RAI and ATD were safe treatment options, with the latter having the least severity of complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients who have been identified to have predictors of remission, we agree with NG145 and ATD should be offered as first-line treatment. However, for those who do not have characteristics aligning with the predictors of remission, RAI should be offered as first-line therapy. Future studies should investigate the effect of biochemical parameters to identify predictors of remission, to aid the choice of treatment in paediatric Graves' disease treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":39048,"journal":{"name":"Thyroid Research","volume":"18 1","pages":"27"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12079944/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing antithyroid drugs vs. radioactive iodine in paediatric Graves' disease: literature review.\",\"authors\":\"Akshat Sinha, Reuben Oza, Brandon Karamveer Sangha, Arshia Akhavan-Mofrad, Arvin Suddhi\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13044-025-00238-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Paediatric Graves' disease (PGD) is an autoimmune condition, which if left untreated, can result in cardiac complications. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) Guidance (NG145) advocates the use of antithyroid drugs (ATD) as first-line therapy for PGD, with a consultation to consider a move to definitive therapy in the form of radioactive iodine (RAI) or thyroidectomy if the initial 2-year course failed to achieve normal thyroid function. We aim to evaluate the effectiveness, adverse events, and potential predictors of remission for ATD and RAI in treating PGD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A thorough guideline search of NICE Evidence and Royal College of Physicians (RCP) guidelines and policy was conducted to yield a guideline relevant to our review question. A literature search of the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE and PubMed, alongside a clear inclusion and exclusion criteria was utilised to generate systematic reviews and primary literature exploring the efficacy and adverse effects (AEs) of ATD and RAI. Our guideline, systematic reviews and primary literature were appraised using AGREE-II, AMSTAR 2 and CASP respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search strategy yielded one NICE guideline (NG145) published in November 2019, two systematic reviews published after November 2019 and four primary studies, published after the most recent systematic review (August 2020). All studies concluded that ATD and RAI are effective treatment options for PGD. With regards to AEs, RAI and ATD were safe treatment options, with the latter having the least severity of complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients who have been identified to have predictors of remission, we agree with NG145 and ATD should be offered as first-line treatment. However, for those who do not have characteristics aligning with the predictors of remission, RAI should be offered as first-line therapy. Future studies should investigate the effect of biochemical parameters to identify predictors of remission, to aid the choice of treatment in paediatric Graves' disease treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39048,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Thyroid Research\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"27\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12079944/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Thyroid Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13044-025-00238-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thyroid Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13044-025-00238-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

儿科格雷夫斯病(PGD)是一种自身免疫性疾病,如果不及时治疗,可导致心脏并发症。国家健康与护理卓越研究所(NICE)指南(NG145)提倡使用抗甲状腺药物(ATD)作为PGD的一线治疗,如果最初的2年疗程未能达到正常的甲状腺功能,咨询考虑以放射性碘(RAI)或甲状腺切除术的形式进行最终治疗。我们的目的是评估ATD和RAI治疗PGD的有效性、不良事件和缓解的潜在预测因素。方法:对NICE证据和皇家医师学院(RCP)指南和政策进行彻底的指南检索,得出与我们综述问题相关的指南。通过Cochrane图书馆、MEDLINE、EMBASE和PubMed的文献检索,以及明确的纳入和排除标准,生成系统评价和主要文献,探讨ATD和RAI的疗效和不良反应(ae)。我们的指南、系统综述和主要文献分别使用AGREE-II、AMSTAR 2和CASP进行评价。结果:检索策略产生了2019年11月发表的一篇NICE指南(NG145), 2019年11月之后发表的两篇系统综述,以及在最近一次系统综述(2020年8月)之后发表的四篇主要研究。所有的研究都认为ATD和RAI是治疗PGD的有效选择。对于ae, RAI和ATD是安全的治疗选择,后者并发症的严重程度最低。结论:对于已确定有缓解预测因子的患者,我们同意将NG145和ATD作为一线治疗。然而,对于那些没有符合缓解预测因子特征的患者,RAI应作为一线治疗。未来的研究应探讨生化参数的作用,以确定缓解的预测因素,以帮助儿科Graves病治疗的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing antithyroid drugs vs. radioactive iodine in paediatric Graves' disease: literature review.

Introduction: Paediatric Graves' disease (PGD) is an autoimmune condition, which if left untreated, can result in cardiac complications. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) Guidance (NG145) advocates the use of antithyroid drugs (ATD) as first-line therapy for PGD, with a consultation to consider a move to definitive therapy in the form of radioactive iodine (RAI) or thyroidectomy if the initial 2-year course failed to achieve normal thyroid function. We aim to evaluate the effectiveness, adverse events, and potential predictors of remission for ATD and RAI in treating PGD.

Methods: A thorough guideline search of NICE Evidence and Royal College of Physicians (RCP) guidelines and policy was conducted to yield a guideline relevant to our review question. A literature search of the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE and PubMed, alongside a clear inclusion and exclusion criteria was utilised to generate systematic reviews and primary literature exploring the efficacy and adverse effects (AEs) of ATD and RAI. Our guideline, systematic reviews and primary literature were appraised using AGREE-II, AMSTAR 2 and CASP respectively.

Results: The search strategy yielded one NICE guideline (NG145) published in November 2019, two systematic reviews published after November 2019 and four primary studies, published after the most recent systematic review (August 2020). All studies concluded that ATD and RAI are effective treatment options for PGD. With regards to AEs, RAI and ATD were safe treatment options, with the latter having the least severity of complications.

Conclusions: In patients who have been identified to have predictors of remission, we agree with NG145 and ATD should be offered as first-line treatment. However, for those who do not have characteristics aligning with the predictors of remission, RAI should be offered as first-line therapy. Future studies should investigate the effect of biochemical parameters to identify predictors of remission, to aid the choice of treatment in paediatric Graves' disease treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Thyroid Research
Thyroid Research Medicine-Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
4.50%
发文量
21
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信