{"title":"两种方法鉴别慢性腹痛患者Carnett征象的比较。随机对照临床试验]。","authors":"William Otero Regino, Gilberto Jaramillo Trujillo, Lina Otero Parra, Hernando Marulanda Fernández, Juan Sebastián Frías, Julián Cardona González, Elder Otero Ramos","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Chronic abdominal pain (CAP) is a challenge in daily consultation. The most frequent cause is anterior cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome (ACNES), which is diagnosed when the Carnett sign is positive. There are two ways to identify the Carnett sign: elevating the head and trunk or elevating the lower extremities. To date, these two ways of looking for the Carnett sign have not been compared.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the effectiveness of the two maneuvers to identify the Carnett sign, evaluate the effectiveness of infiltration of the tender points with 2% lidocaine, and estimate the cost of examinations before diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Randomized controlled study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>1320 patients were included and 660 patients were randomly assigned to group A: elevation of the head and trunk and 660 to group B: elevation of the lower extremities. Both maneuvers were similarly effective in identifying the Carnett sign. Infiltration of the points produced immediate relief in most patients. The costs of different studies before definitive diagnosis were approximately US$ 861 000 (dollars) versus US$ 66.00, which would be equivalent to 7.6% of the expenses incurred for tests performed before diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The two ways of exploring the Carnett sign have similar efficacy. Infiltration with 2% lidocaine produced rapid and significant improvement of pain with minimal side effects. Not knowing the Carnett sign increases health costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":35807,"journal":{"name":"Revista de gastroenterologia del Peru : organo oficial de la Sociedad de Gastroenterologia del Peru","volume":"45 1","pages":"8-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Comparison of two maneuvers to identify Carnett's sign in patients with chronic abdominal pain. Randomized controlled clinical trial].\",\"authors\":\"William Otero Regino, Gilberto Jaramillo Trujillo, Lina Otero Parra, Hernando Marulanda Fernández, Juan Sebastián Frías, Julián Cardona González, Elder Otero Ramos\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Chronic abdominal pain (CAP) is a challenge in daily consultation. The most frequent cause is anterior cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome (ACNES), which is diagnosed when the Carnett sign is positive. There are two ways to identify the Carnett sign: elevating the head and trunk or elevating the lower extremities. To date, these two ways of looking for the Carnett sign have not been compared.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the effectiveness of the two maneuvers to identify the Carnett sign, evaluate the effectiveness of infiltration of the tender points with 2% lidocaine, and estimate the cost of examinations before diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Randomized controlled study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>1320 patients were included and 660 patients were randomly assigned to group A: elevation of the head and trunk and 660 to group B: elevation of the lower extremities. Both maneuvers were similarly effective in identifying the Carnett sign. Infiltration of the points produced immediate relief in most patients. The costs of different studies before definitive diagnosis were approximately US$ 861 000 (dollars) versus US$ 66.00, which would be equivalent to 7.6% of the expenses incurred for tests performed before diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The two ways of exploring the Carnett sign have similar efficacy. Infiltration with 2% lidocaine produced rapid and significant improvement of pain with minimal side effects. Not knowing the Carnett sign increases health costs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35807,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de gastroenterologia del Peru : organo oficial de la Sociedad de Gastroenterologia del Peru\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"8-15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de gastroenterologia del Peru : organo oficial de la Sociedad de Gastroenterologia del Peru\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de gastroenterologia del Peru : organo oficial de la Sociedad de Gastroenterologia del Peru","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
[Comparison of two maneuvers to identify Carnett's sign in patients with chronic abdominal pain. Randomized controlled clinical trial].
Introduction: Chronic abdominal pain (CAP) is a challenge in daily consultation. The most frequent cause is anterior cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome (ACNES), which is diagnosed when the Carnett sign is positive. There are two ways to identify the Carnett sign: elevating the head and trunk or elevating the lower extremities. To date, these two ways of looking for the Carnett sign have not been compared.
Objective: To compare the effectiveness of the two maneuvers to identify the Carnett sign, evaluate the effectiveness of infiltration of the tender points with 2% lidocaine, and estimate the cost of examinations before diagnosis.
Material and methods: Randomized controlled study.
Results: 1320 patients were included and 660 patients were randomly assigned to group A: elevation of the head and trunk and 660 to group B: elevation of the lower extremities. Both maneuvers were similarly effective in identifying the Carnett sign. Infiltration of the points produced immediate relief in most patients. The costs of different studies before definitive diagnosis were approximately US$ 861 000 (dollars) versus US$ 66.00, which would be equivalent to 7.6% of the expenses incurred for tests performed before diagnosis.
Conclusion: The two ways of exploring the Carnett sign have similar efficacy. Infiltration with 2% lidocaine produced rapid and significant improvement of pain with minimal side effects. Not knowing the Carnett sign increases health costs.
期刊介绍:
La REVISTA DE GASTROENTEROLOGíA DEL PERÚ, es la publicación oficial de la Sociedad de Gastroenterología del Perú que publica artículos originales, artículos de revisión, reporte de casos, cartas e información general de la especialidad; dirigido a los profesionales de la salud con especial interés en la gastroenterología. La Revista de Gastroenterología del Perú es una publicación de periodicidad trimestral y tiene como objetivo la publicación de artículos científicos inéditos en el campo de la gastroenterología, proporcionando información actualizada y relevante de la especialidad y áreas afines. La Revista de Gastroenterología del Perú publica artículos en dos idiomas, español e inglés, a texto completo en la versión impresa yelectrónica. Los artículos científicos son sometidos a revisores o árbitros nacionales e internacionales, especialistas que opinan bajo la modalidad de doble ciego y de manera anónima sobre la calidad y validez de los mismos. El número de revisores depende del tipo de artículo, dos revisores como mínimo para artículos originales y uno como mínimo para otros tipos de artículos.