社会悲观主义和荷兰非父母生育预期的轨迹。

IF 2.1 Q2 DEMOGRAPHY
Genus Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-12 DOI:10.1186/s41118-025-00246-3
Katya Ivanova
{"title":"社会悲观主义和荷兰非父母生育预期的轨迹。","authors":"Katya Ivanova","doi":"10.1186/s41118-025-00246-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study utilizes prospective data from the Dutch Longitudinal Internet Studies for the Social Sciences (LISS) panel to explore two research questions. First, can distinct trajectories of fertility expectations be identified among Dutch women and men in reproductive age (18 to 45/50) who do not have children? Second, do these trajectories differ in terms of self-reported societal pessimism at the start of that trajectory? We employed joint latent class analysis with Latent GOLD which allowed us to model the trajectories of fertility expectations while accounting for the fact that some of the respondents made the transition to parenthood during observation. The trajectories were estimated from entry into the panel until dropout, the end of the observation period (2022, or until reaching age 45 for women and 50 for men), or until the participant became a parent. For both women (<i>n</i> = 1,260) and men (<i>n</i> = 1,110), three similar classes emerged: 'committed to parenthood' (the largest class), 'uncertain' (24% of women and 22% of men), and 'early commitment to no expectation' (13.3% for women and 9.4% for men). In addition, a fourth class-'later arrivals to expectation of parenthood'-was identified among men. Bias-adjusted comparisons revealed significant differences only among women: those committed to parenthood exhibited the lowest levels of societal pessimism, while the 'uncertain' group reported the highest. These differences persisted even after adjusting for relevant control variables at the time when societal pessimism was captured, including depression levels, income satisfaction, partnership status, and education.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41118-025-00246-3.</p>","PeriodicalId":35741,"journal":{"name":"Genus","volume":"81 1","pages":"10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12069139/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Societal pessimism and trajectories of fertility expectations among Dutch non-parents.\",\"authors\":\"Katya Ivanova\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s41118-025-00246-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study utilizes prospective data from the Dutch Longitudinal Internet Studies for the Social Sciences (LISS) panel to explore two research questions. First, can distinct trajectories of fertility expectations be identified among Dutch women and men in reproductive age (18 to 45/50) who do not have children? Second, do these trajectories differ in terms of self-reported societal pessimism at the start of that trajectory? We employed joint latent class analysis with Latent GOLD which allowed us to model the trajectories of fertility expectations while accounting for the fact that some of the respondents made the transition to parenthood during observation. The trajectories were estimated from entry into the panel until dropout, the end of the observation period (2022, or until reaching age 45 for women and 50 for men), or until the participant became a parent. For both women (<i>n</i> = 1,260) and men (<i>n</i> = 1,110), three similar classes emerged: 'committed to parenthood' (the largest class), 'uncertain' (24% of women and 22% of men), and 'early commitment to no expectation' (13.3% for women and 9.4% for men). In addition, a fourth class-'later arrivals to expectation of parenthood'-was identified among men. Bias-adjusted comparisons revealed significant differences only among women: those committed to parenthood exhibited the lowest levels of societal pessimism, while the 'uncertain' group reported the highest. These differences persisted even after adjusting for relevant control variables at the time when societal pessimism was captured, including depression levels, income satisfaction, partnership status, and education.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41118-025-00246-3.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35741,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Genus\",\"volume\":\"81 1\",\"pages\":\"10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12069139/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Genus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41118-025-00246-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DEMOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41118-025-00246-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究利用荷兰社会科学纵向互联网研究(LISS)小组的前瞻性数据来探索两个研究问题。首先,在育龄(18至45/50岁)没有孩子的荷兰女性和男性中,能否确定生育预期的明显轨迹?第二,这些轨迹在轨迹开始时自我报告的社会悲观主义方面是否有所不同?我们采用联合潜在阶级分析与潜在黄金,这使我们能够模拟生育预期的轨迹,同时考虑到一些受访者在观察期间过渡到父母身份的事实。这些轨迹是从进入小组直到退学,观察期结束(2022年,或直到女性45岁,男性50岁),或直到参与者成为父母为止。在女性(1,260人)和男性(1,110人)中,出现了三个相似的类别:“承诺为人父母”(人数最多)、“不确定”(24%的女性和22%的男性)和“过早承诺不期望”(13.3%的女性和9.4%的男性)。此外,第四种阶层——“晚到为人父母”——在男性中被发现。经过偏见调整后的比较显示,只有女性之间存在显著差异:那些致力于为人父母的女性表现出最低程度的社会悲观情绪,而“不确定”的女性表现出最高程度的悲观情绪。即使在调整了相关的控制变量(包括抑郁程度、收入满意度、伴侣关系状态和教育程度)后,这些差异仍然存在。补充信息:在线版本包含补充资料,下载地址:10.1186/s41118-025-00246-3。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Societal pessimism and trajectories of fertility expectations among Dutch non-parents.

This study utilizes prospective data from the Dutch Longitudinal Internet Studies for the Social Sciences (LISS) panel to explore two research questions. First, can distinct trajectories of fertility expectations be identified among Dutch women and men in reproductive age (18 to 45/50) who do not have children? Second, do these trajectories differ in terms of self-reported societal pessimism at the start of that trajectory? We employed joint latent class analysis with Latent GOLD which allowed us to model the trajectories of fertility expectations while accounting for the fact that some of the respondents made the transition to parenthood during observation. The trajectories were estimated from entry into the panel until dropout, the end of the observation period (2022, or until reaching age 45 for women and 50 for men), or until the participant became a parent. For both women (n = 1,260) and men (n = 1,110), three similar classes emerged: 'committed to parenthood' (the largest class), 'uncertain' (24% of women and 22% of men), and 'early commitment to no expectation' (13.3% for women and 9.4% for men). In addition, a fourth class-'later arrivals to expectation of parenthood'-was identified among men. Bias-adjusted comparisons revealed significant differences only among women: those committed to parenthood exhibited the lowest levels of societal pessimism, while the 'uncertain' group reported the highest. These differences persisted even after adjusting for relevant control variables at the time when societal pessimism was captured, including depression levels, income satisfaction, partnership status, and education.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41118-025-00246-3.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Genus
Genus Social Sciences-Demography
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信