感知有用性驱动传统、补充和综合医学的使用:一项系统的综述。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Walaa H Maghrabi, Hanan Badr, Alhanouf Alkhyat, Judith M Schlaeger, Fritschi Cynthia
{"title":"感知有用性驱动传统、补充和综合医学的使用:一项系统的综述。","authors":"Walaa H Maghrabi, Hanan Badr, Alhanouf Alkhyat, Judith M Schlaeger, Fritschi Cynthia","doi":"10.1089/jicm.2024.0841","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> The use of traditional, complementary, and integrative medicine (TCIM) has grown rapidly worldwide. The aim of this umbrella review is to provide a comprehensive synthesis of the available evidence on factors associated with TCIM use to identify the most influential factor driving the use of TCIM. This review was guided by the following research question: What is the most influential factor driving TCIM use? <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. International literature was systematically searched using PubMed, Embase, and manual searching of reference lists. The search was limited to peer-reviewed systematic literature reviews published between January 2005 to March 2024, in Arabic and English languages, and reported empirical research findings on factors associated with TCIM use. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 62 review articles were included. The following five prominent factors were identified and critically analyzed: Socioeconomic status; dissatisfaction with conventional medicine; internal locus of control; being holistic, natural, and safe; and perceived usefulness. Of these, perceived usefulness, defined as the perceived benefits of a TCIM modality in meeting specific health needs or goals, was the most influential factor driving TCIM use. <b><i>Discussion:</i></b> The findings of this umbrella review revealed that individuals would not use a specific type of TCIM unless they perceived some benefit from its use, even if the benefit lacked supporting scientific evidence. This insight provides a foundation for researchers, health practitioners, and policymakers to advance TCIM research, clinical practice, and policy by targeting its perceived benefits. Focusing on perceived benefits can help researchers prioritize areas that are most valued by patients, leading to more impactful studies and evidence-based recommendations for practice. Understanding perceived benefits can also lead to more informed discussions between patients and health practitioners, creating a more collaborative and culturally sensitive health care environment. Furthermore, addressing perceived benefits can guide regulations to ensure the safe, effective, and ethical use of TCIM practices, leading to more effective integration of TCIM into conventional medicine as the evidence of its usefulness accumulates.</p>","PeriodicalId":29734,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perceived Usefulness Drives the Use of Traditional, Complementary, and Integrative Medicine: A Systematic Umbrella Review.\",\"authors\":\"Walaa H Maghrabi, Hanan Badr, Alhanouf Alkhyat, Judith M Schlaeger, Fritschi Cynthia\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/jicm.2024.0841\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> The use of traditional, complementary, and integrative medicine (TCIM) has grown rapidly worldwide. The aim of this umbrella review is to provide a comprehensive synthesis of the available evidence on factors associated with TCIM use to identify the most influential factor driving the use of TCIM. This review was guided by the following research question: What is the most influential factor driving TCIM use? <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. International literature was systematically searched using PubMed, Embase, and manual searching of reference lists. The search was limited to peer-reviewed systematic literature reviews published between January 2005 to March 2024, in Arabic and English languages, and reported empirical research findings on factors associated with TCIM use. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 62 review articles were included. The following five prominent factors were identified and critically analyzed: Socioeconomic status; dissatisfaction with conventional medicine; internal locus of control; being holistic, natural, and safe; and perceived usefulness. Of these, perceived usefulness, defined as the perceived benefits of a TCIM modality in meeting specific health needs or goals, was the most influential factor driving TCIM use. <b><i>Discussion:</i></b> The findings of this umbrella review revealed that individuals would not use a specific type of TCIM unless they perceived some benefit from its use, even if the benefit lacked supporting scientific evidence. This insight provides a foundation for researchers, health practitioners, and policymakers to advance TCIM research, clinical practice, and policy by targeting its perceived benefits. Focusing on perceived benefits can help researchers prioritize areas that are most valued by patients, leading to more impactful studies and evidence-based recommendations for practice. Understanding perceived benefits can also lead to more informed discussions between patients and health practitioners, creating a more collaborative and culturally sensitive health care environment. Furthermore, addressing perceived benefits can guide regulations to ensure the safe, effective, and ethical use of TCIM practices, leading to more effective integration of TCIM into conventional medicine as the evidence of its usefulness accumulates.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":29734,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/jicm.2024.0841\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jicm.2024.0841","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

传统、补充和综合医学(TCIM)的使用在世界范围内迅速增长。这项总括性审查的目的是全面综合现有的与TCIM使用有关的因素的证据,以确定推动TCIM使用的最具影响力的因素。本综述以以下研究问题为指导:驱动TCIM使用的最具影响力的因素是什么?方法:本综述按照PRISMA指南进行。使用PubMed、Embase和手工检索参考文献表系统地检索国际文献。该研究仅限于2005年1月至2024年3月间以阿拉伯语和英语发表的同行评议的系统文献综述,并报告了与TCIM使用相关因素的实证研究结果。结果:共纳入62篇综述文章。确定并批判性地分析了以下五个突出因素:社会经济地位;对传统医学的不满;内在控制点;整体、自然、安全;感知有用性。其中,感知有用性(定义为TCIM模式在满足特定健康需求或目标方面的感知益处)是推动TCIM使用的最具影响力的因素。讨论:这一总结性综述的发现表明,除非个人认为使用某种特定类型的TCIM有好处,否则他们不会使用这种方法,即使这种好处缺乏支持的科学证据。这一见解为研究人员、卫生从业人员和政策制定者提供了一个基础,可以通过针对TCIM的感知益处来推进TCIM的研究、临床实践和政策。关注感知到的益处可以帮助研究人员优先考虑患者最重视的领域,从而产生更有影响力的研究和基于证据的实践建议。了解感知到的好处还可以导致患者和卫生从业人员之间更知情的讨论,创造一个更具协作性和文化敏感性的卫生保健环境。此外,解决感知到的好处可以指导法规,以确保安全、有效和合乎道德地使用TCIM实践,随着TCIM有用性证据的积累,导致更有效地将TCIM整合到传统医学中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perceived Usefulness Drives the Use of Traditional, Complementary, and Integrative Medicine: A Systematic Umbrella Review.

Introduction: The use of traditional, complementary, and integrative medicine (TCIM) has grown rapidly worldwide. The aim of this umbrella review is to provide a comprehensive synthesis of the available evidence on factors associated with TCIM use to identify the most influential factor driving the use of TCIM. This review was guided by the following research question: What is the most influential factor driving TCIM use? Methods: This review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. International literature was systematically searched using PubMed, Embase, and manual searching of reference lists. The search was limited to peer-reviewed systematic literature reviews published between January 2005 to March 2024, in Arabic and English languages, and reported empirical research findings on factors associated with TCIM use. Results: A total of 62 review articles were included. The following five prominent factors were identified and critically analyzed: Socioeconomic status; dissatisfaction with conventional medicine; internal locus of control; being holistic, natural, and safe; and perceived usefulness. Of these, perceived usefulness, defined as the perceived benefits of a TCIM modality in meeting specific health needs or goals, was the most influential factor driving TCIM use. Discussion: The findings of this umbrella review revealed that individuals would not use a specific type of TCIM unless they perceived some benefit from its use, even if the benefit lacked supporting scientific evidence. This insight provides a foundation for researchers, health practitioners, and policymakers to advance TCIM research, clinical practice, and policy by targeting its perceived benefits. Focusing on perceived benefits can help researchers prioritize areas that are most valued by patients, leading to more impactful studies and evidence-based recommendations for practice. Understanding perceived benefits can also lead to more informed discussions between patients and health practitioners, creating a more collaborative and culturally sensitive health care environment. Furthermore, addressing perceived benefits can guide regulations to ensure the safe, effective, and ethical use of TCIM practices, leading to more effective integration of TCIM into conventional medicine as the evidence of its usefulness accumulates.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信