{"title":"[男性人工尿道括约肌植入术的远期功能结果]。","authors":"A Tomilov A, I Veliev E, N Golubtsova E","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Urinary incontinence after radical treatment of prostate cancer causes a significant negative impact on the quality of life. Patients with severe urinary incontinence are most commonly treated with artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) placement.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the functional results of AUS implantation in patients with severe urinary incontinence at long-term follow-up.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Between 2004 and 2023, the AUS was implanted in 62 patients with severe stress urinary incontinence. Urinary losses were assessed using a bladder diary. No need to use pads or use of no more than 1 safety pad per day (\"social continence\") was considered a success, while use of no more than 2 pads, or a reduction in urine loss of more than 50% was regarded as an improvement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean patient age at the time of AUS implantation was 67.4+/-8 years. Urinary incontinence was most often a complication of radical prostatectomy (61.3%). A history of radiation therapy, previous treatment of urethral stricture, and surgical procedures for urinary incontinence were noted in 14.5%, 48.4%, and 19.4% of patients, respectively. The median follow-up was 73.5 months (IQR 14.8-118.3 months). There was a significant decrease in median urine loss from 900 mL (IQR 700-1100 mL) to 7 mL (IQR 0-35 mL; p<0.05), and a decrease in the number of pads used per day from 7 (IQR 6-8) to 1 (IQR 0-2; p<0.05). The criterion for successful implantation was met in 69.4% of patients, while 43.5% of patients did not use pads. According to the correlation analysis, concomitant diabetes mellitus, history of radiation therapy, surgical treatment of the urethral stricture or urinary incontinence did not have any significant effect on functional results. In addition, there were no cases of AUS revision.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AUS placement in patients with severe stress urinary incontinence allows to achieve satisfactory functional results during long-term follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":23546,"journal":{"name":"Urologiia","volume":" 6","pages":"90-94"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Long-term functional results of artificial urinary sphincter implantation in men].\",\"authors\":\"A Tomilov A, I Veliev E, N Golubtsova E\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Urinary incontinence after radical treatment of prostate cancer causes a significant negative impact on the quality of life. Patients with severe urinary incontinence are most commonly treated with artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) placement.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the functional results of AUS implantation in patients with severe urinary incontinence at long-term follow-up.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Between 2004 and 2023, the AUS was implanted in 62 patients with severe stress urinary incontinence. Urinary losses were assessed using a bladder diary. No need to use pads or use of no more than 1 safety pad per day (\\\"social continence\\\") was considered a success, while use of no more than 2 pads, or a reduction in urine loss of more than 50% was regarded as an improvement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean patient age at the time of AUS implantation was 67.4+/-8 years. Urinary incontinence was most often a complication of radical prostatectomy (61.3%). A history of radiation therapy, previous treatment of urethral stricture, and surgical procedures for urinary incontinence were noted in 14.5%, 48.4%, and 19.4% of patients, respectively. The median follow-up was 73.5 months (IQR 14.8-118.3 months). There was a significant decrease in median urine loss from 900 mL (IQR 700-1100 mL) to 7 mL (IQR 0-35 mL; p<0.05), and a decrease in the number of pads used per day from 7 (IQR 6-8) to 1 (IQR 0-2; p<0.05). The criterion for successful implantation was met in 69.4% of patients, while 43.5% of patients did not use pads. According to the correlation analysis, concomitant diabetes mellitus, history of radiation therapy, surgical treatment of the urethral stricture or urinary incontinence did not have any significant effect on functional results. In addition, there were no cases of AUS revision.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AUS placement in patients with severe stress urinary incontinence allows to achieve satisfactory functional results during long-term follow-up.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23546,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urologiia\",\"volume\":\" 6\",\"pages\":\"90-94\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urologiia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologiia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导读:前列腺癌根治后尿失禁对生活质量有显著的负面影响。严重尿失禁的患者最常采用人工尿括约肌(AUS)放置治疗。目的:评价AUS植入对严重尿失禁患者的长期随访效果。材料与方法:2004 - 2023年间,对62例重度应激性尿失禁患者植入AUS。用膀胱日记评估尿量。不需要使用护垫或每天使用不超过1块安全护垫(“社交自制”)被认为是成功的,而使用不超过2块护垫或尿量减少超过50%被认为是一种改善。结果:患者植入AUS时的平均年龄为67.4±8岁。尿失禁是根治性前列腺切除术最常见的并发症(61.3%)。14.5%的患者有放射治疗史,48.4%的患者有尿道狭窄治疗史,19.4%的患者有尿失禁手术史。中位随访时间为73.5个月(IQR 14.8 ~ 118.3个月)。尿量中位数从900 mL (IQR 700-1100 mL)显著下降到7 mL (IQR 0-35 mL);结论:在长期随访中,重度应激性尿失禁患者放置AUS可获得满意的功能效果。
[Long-term functional results of artificial urinary sphincter implantation in men].
Introduction: Urinary incontinence after radical treatment of prostate cancer causes a significant negative impact on the quality of life. Patients with severe urinary incontinence are most commonly treated with artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) placement.
Aim: To evaluate the functional results of AUS implantation in patients with severe urinary incontinence at long-term follow-up.
Materials and methods: Between 2004 and 2023, the AUS was implanted in 62 patients with severe stress urinary incontinence. Urinary losses were assessed using a bladder diary. No need to use pads or use of no more than 1 safety pad per day ("social continence") was considered a success, while use of no more than 2 pads, or a reduction in urine loss of more than 50% was regarded as an improvement.
Results: The mean patient age at the time of AUS implantation was 67.4+/-8 years. Urinary incontinence was most often a complication of radical prostatectomy (61.3%). A history of radiation therapy, previous treatment of urethral stricture, and surgical procedures for urinary incontinence were noted in 14.5%, 48.4%, and 19.4% of patients, respectively. The median follow-up was 73.5 months (IQR 14.8-118.3 months). There was a significant decrease in median urine loss from 900 mL (IQR 700-1100 mL) to 7 mL (IQR 0-35 mL; p<0.05), and a decrease in the number of pads used per day from 7 (IQR 6-8) to 1 (IQR 0-2; p<0.05). The criterion for successful implantation was met in 69.4% of patients, while 43.5% of patients did not use pads. According to the correlation analysis, concomitant diabetes mellitus, history of radiation therapy, surgical treatment of the urethral stricture or urinary incontinence did not have any significant effect on functional results. In addition, there were no cases of AUS revision.
Conclusions: AUS placement in patients with severe stress urinary incontinence allows to achieve satisfactory functional results during long-term follow-up.