对新辅助化疗无反应的乳腺癌可放弃辅助化疗:一项基于人群的大型队列研究。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Lixi Li, Di Zhang, Shuning Liu, Cheng Zeng, Yalong Qi, Fei Ma
{"title":"对新辅助化疗无反应的乳腺癌可放弃辅助化疗:一项基于人群的大型队列研究。","authors":"Lixi Li, Di Zhang, Shuning Liu, Cheng Zeng, Yalong Qi, Fei Ma","doi":"10.1111/1759-7714.70069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in breast cancer patients who did not respond to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) following surgery.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A retrospective analysis was performed using a large, population-based cohort to identify breast cancer patients who underwent radical surgery following NAC without achieving a response. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression models were employed to assess clinical outcomes and prognostic factors. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to compare outcomes between patients receiving AC vs. those who did not, followed by subgroup analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1866 patients were included, of whom 1030 received postoperative AC. The median follow-up time was 68.0 months. Patients receiving AC had a median overall survival (OS) of 124.0 months, compared to 93.0 months for those not receiving AC. However, multivariate analysis indicated that receiving postoperative AC was not an independent prognostic factor. Furthermore, PSM analysis indicated no improvement in long-term survival for patients receiving postoperative AC compared to those not receiving it. Subgroup analysis further supported these findings, revealing no significant differences in OS between AC and Non-AC cohorts across various subgroups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings suggest that breast cancer patients unresponsive to NAC may derive limited benefit from subsequent AC. Therefore, the decision to administer AC should be carefully considered, and alternative therapeutic strategies should be explored for these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":23338,"journal":{"name":"Thoracic Cancer","volume":"16 9","pages":"e70069"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12080460/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adjuvant Chemotherapy May be Waived for Breast Cancer Nonresponders to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Population-Based Large Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Lixi Li, Di Zhang, Shuning Liu, Cheng Zeng, Yalong Qi, Fei Ma\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1759-7714.70069\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in breast cancer patients who did not respond to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) following surgery.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A retrospective analysis was performed using a large, population-based cohort to identify breast cancer patients who underwent radical surgery following NAC without achieving a response. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression models were employed to assess clinical outcomes and prognostic factors. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to compare outcomes between patients receiving AC vs. those who did not, followed by subgroup analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1866 patients were included, of whom 1030 received postoperative AC. The median follow-up time was 68.0 months. Patients receiving AC had a median overall survival (OS) of 124.0 months, compared to 93.0 months for those not receiving AC. However, multivariate analysis indicated that receiving postoperative AC was not an independent prognostic factor. Furthermore, PSM analysis indicated no improvement in long-term survival for patients receiving postoperative AC compared to those not receiving it. Subgroup analysis further supported these findings, revealing no significant differences in OS between AC and Non-AC cohorts across various subgroups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings suggest that breast cancer patients unresponsive to NAC may derive limited benefit from subsequent AC. Therefore, the decision to administer AC should be carefully considered, and alternative therapeutic strategies should be explored for these patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23338,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Thoracic Cancer\",\"volume\":\"16 9\",\"pages\":\"e70069\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12080460/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Thoracic Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.70069\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thoracic Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.70069","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评价辅助化疗(AC)对术后新辅助化疗(NAC)无反应的乳腺癌患者的疗效。方法:采用大型人群队列进行回顾性分析,以确定在NAC后接受根治性手术但未取得反应的乳腺癌患者。采用Kaplan-Meier分析和Cox回归模型评估临床结局和预后因素。倾向评分匹配(PSM)用于比较接受AC治疗和未接受AC治疗的患者之间的结果,然后进行亚组分析。结果:共纳入1866例患者,其中1030例患者术后接受AC治疗,中位随访时间为68.0个月。接受AC治疗的患者的中位总生存期(OS)为124.0个月,而未接受AC治疗的患者为93.0个月。然而,多因素分析表明,术后接受AC治疗并不是一个独立的预后因素。此外,PSM分析显示,与未接受AC治疗的患者相比,术后接受AC治疗的患者的长期生存没有改善。亚组分析进一步支持了这些发现,显示不同亚组中AC和非AC队列的OS无显著差异。结论:这些研究结果表明,对NAC无反应的乳腺癌患者可能从随后的AC中获得有限的益处。因此,应慎重考虑给予AC的决定,并为这些患者探索替代治疗策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Adjuvant Chemotherapy May be Waived for Breast Cancer Nonresponders to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Population-Based Large Cohort Study.

Adjuvant Chemotherapy May be Waived for Breast Cancer Nonresponders to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Population-Based Large Cohort Study.

Adjuvant Chemotherapy May be Waived for Breast Cancer Nonresponders to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Population-Based Large Cohort Study.

Adjuvant Chemotherapy May be Waived for Breast Cancer Nonresponders to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Population-Based Large Cohort Study.

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in breast cancer patients who did not respond to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) following surgery.

Method: A retrospective analysis was performed using a large, population-based cohort to identify breast cancer patients who underwent radical surgery following NAC without achieving a response. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression models were employed to assess clinical outcomes and prognostic factors. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to compare outcomes between patients receiving AC vs. those who did not, followed by subgroup analyses.

Results: A total of 1866 patients were included, of whom 1030 received postoperative AC. The median follow-up time was 68.0 months. Patients receiving AC had a median overall survival (OS) of 124.0 months, compared to 93.0 months for those not receiving AC. However, multivariate analysis indicated that receiving postoperative AC was not an independent prognostic factor. Furthermore, PSM analysis indicated no improvement in long-term survival for patients receiving postoperative AC compared to those not receiving it. Subgroup analysis further supported these findings, revealing no significant differences in OS between AC and Non-AC cohorts across various subgroups.

Conclusion: These findings suggest that breast cancer patients unresponsive to NAC may derive limited benefit from subsequent AC. Therefore, the decision to administer AC should be carefully considered, and alternative therapeutic strategies should be explored for these patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Thoracic Cancer
Thoracic Cancer ONCOLOGY-RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.40%
发文量
439
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Thoracic Cancer aims to facilitate international collaboration and exchange of comprehensive and cutting-edge information on basic, translational, and applied clinical research in lung cancer, esophageal cancer, mediastinal cancer, breast cancer and other thoracic malignancies. Prevention, treatment and research relevant to Asia-Pacific is a focus area, but submissions from all regions are welcomed. The editors encourage contributions relevant to prevention, general thoracic surgery, medical oncology, radiology, radiation medicine, pathology, basic cancer research, as well as epidemiological and translational studies in thoracic cancer. Thoracic Cancer is the official publication of the Chinese Society of Lung Cancer, International Chinese Society of Thoracic Surgery and is endorsed by the Korean Association for the Study of Lung Cancer and the Hong Kong Cancer Therapy Society. The Journal publishes a range of article types including: Editorials, Invited Reviews, Mini Reviews, Original Articles, Clinical Guidelines, Technological Notes, Imaging in thoracic cancer, Meeting Reports, Case Reports, Letters to the Editor, Commentaries, and Brief Reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信