Lixi Li, Di Zhang, Shuning Liu, Cheng Zeng, Yalong Qi, Fei Ma
{"title":"对新辅助化疗无反应的乳腺癌可放弃辅助化疗:一项基于人群的大型队列研究。","authors":"Lixi Li, Di Zhang, Shuning Liu, Cheng Zeng, Yalong Qi, Fei Ma","doi":"10.1111/1759-7714.70069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in breast cancer patients who did not respond to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) following surgery.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A retrospective analysis was performed using a large, population-based cohort to identify breast cancer patients who underwent radical surgery following NAC without achieving a response. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression models were employed to assess clinical outcomes and prognostic factors. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to compare outcomes between patients receiving AC vs. those who did not, followed by subgroup analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1866 patients were included, of whom 1030 received postoperative AC. The median follow-up time was 68.0 months. Patients receiving AC had a median overall survival (OS) of 124.0 months, compared to 93.0 months for those not receiving AC. However, multivariate analysis indicated that receiving postoperative AC was not an independent prognostic factor. Furthermore, PSM analysis indicated no improvement in long-term survival for patients receiving postoperative AC compared to those not receiving it. Subgroup analysis further supported these findings, revealing no significant differences in OS between AC and Non-AC cohorts across various subgroups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings suggest that breast cancer patients unresponsive to NAC may derive limited benefit from subsequent AC. Therefore, the decision to administer AC should be carefully considered, and alternative therapeutic strategies should be explored for these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":23338,"journal":{"name":"Thoracic Cancer","volume":"16 9","pages":"e70069"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12080460/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adjuvant Chemotherapy May be Waived for Breast Cancer Nonresponders to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Population-Based Large Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Lixi Li, Di Zhang, Shuning Liu, Cheng Zeng, Yalong Qi, Fei Ma\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1759-7714.70069\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in breast cancer patients who did not respond to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) following surgery.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A retrospective analysis was performed using a large, population-based cohort to identify breast cancer patients who underwent radical surgery following NAC without achieving a response. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression models were employed to assess clinical outcomes and prognostic factors. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to compare outcomes between patients receiving AC vs. those who did not, followed by subgroup analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1866 patients were included, of whom 1030 received postoperative AC. The median follow-up time was 68.0 months. Patients receiving AC had a median overall survival (OS) of 124.0 months, compared to 93.0 months for those not receiving AC. However, multivariate analysis indicated that receiving postoperative AC was not an independent prognostic factor. Furthermore, PSM analysis indicated no improvement in long-term survival for patients receiving postoperative AC compared to those not receiving it. Subgroup analysis further supported these findings, revealing no significant differences in OS between AC and Non-AC cohorts across various subgroups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings suggest that breast cancer patients unresponsive to NAC may derive limited benefit from subsequent AC. Therefore, the decision to administer AC should be carefully considered, and alternative therapeutic strategies should be explored for these patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23338,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Thoracic Cancer\",\"volume\":\"16 9\",\"pages\":\"e70069\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12080460/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Thoracic Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.70069\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thoracic Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.70069","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Adjuvant Chemotherapy May be Waived for Breast Cancer Nonresponders to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Population-Based Large Cohort Study.
Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in breast cancer patients who did not respond to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) following surgery.
Method: A retrospective analysis was performed using a large, population-based cohort to identify breast cancer patients who underwent radical surgery following NAC without achieving a response. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression models were employed to assess clinical outcomes and prognostic factors. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to compare outcomes between patients receiving AC vs. those who did not, followed by subgroup analyses.
Results: A total of 1866 patients were included, of whom 1030 received postoperative AC. The median follow-up time was 68.0 months. Patients receiving AC had a median overall survival (OS) of 124.0 months, compared to 93.0 months for those not receiving AC. However, multivariate analysis indicated that receiving postoperative AC was not an independent prognostic factor. Furthermore, PSM analysis indicated no improvement in long-term survival for patients receiving postoperative AC compared to those not receiving it. Subgroup analysis further supported these findings, revealing no significant differences in OS between AC and Non-AC cohorts across various subgroups.
Conclusion: These findings suggest that breast cancer patients unresponsive to NAC may derive limited benefit from subsequent AC. Therefore, the decision to administer AC should be carefully considered, and alternative therapeutic strategies should be explored for these patients.
期刊介绍:
Thoracic Cancer aims to facilitate international collaboration and exchange of comprehensive and cutting-edge information on basic, translational, and applied clinical research in lung cancer, esophageal cancer, mediastinal cancer, breast cancer and other thoracic malignancies. Prevention, treatment and research relevant to Asia-Pacific is a focus area, but submissions from all regions are welcomed. The editors encourage contributions relevant to prevention, general thoracic surgery, medical oncology, radiology, radiation medicine, pathology, basic cancer research, as well as epidemiological and translational studies in thoracic cancer. Thoracic Cancer is the official publication of the Chinese Society of Lung Cancer, International Chinese Society of Thoracic Surgery and is endorsed by the Korean Association for the Study of Lung Cancer and the Hong Kong Cancer Therapy Society.
The Journal publishes a range of article types including: Editorials, Invited Reviews, Mini Reviews, Original Articles, Clinical Guidelines, Technological Notes, Imaging in thoracic cancer, Meeting Reports, Case Reports, Letters to the Editor, Commentaries, and Brief Reports.