在业余拳击中使用护头的案例及其对护头禁令国际政策的影响。

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
Kelvin Le, James Norton Marchant, Khang Duy Ricky Le
{"title":"在业余拳击中使用护头的案例及其对护头禁令国际政策的影响。","authors":"Kelvin Le, James Norton Marchant, Khang Duy Ricky Le","doi":"10.1186/s40798-025-00871-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The recent prohibition of headguards by the International Boxing Association (IBA; previously AIBA) has sparked worldwide controversy regarding safeguarding the health of athletes in the boxing community. Studies have evaluated the role of headguards in preventing concussion, cuts and lacerations and fractures. However, the evidence for improvement in these outcomes remains poorly characterised and a gap remains in the ability to inform evidence-based sport and health policy in this space. This Current Opinion article demonstrates the effectiveness of headguards in protecting against cuts and lacerations and notes there is insufficient evidence supporting headguard bans. Furthermore, this article highlights a gap in collaborative effort and communication between the IBA and smaller representative bodies, which is an important consideration for future policy reform.</p>","PeriodicalId":21788,"journal":{"name":"Sports Medicine - Open","volume":"11 1","pages":"54"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12084430/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Case for Protective Headguards in Amateur Boxing and Implications for International Policy on Headguard Bans.\",\"authors\":\"Kelvin Le, James Norton Marchant, Khang Duy Ricky Le\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40798-025-00871-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The recent prohibition of headguards by the International Boxing Association (IBA; previously AIBA) has sparked worldwide controversy regarding safeguarding the health of athletes in the boxing community. Studies have evaluated the role of headguards in preventing concussion, cuts and lacerations and fractures. However, the evidence for improvement in these outcomes remains poorly characterised and a gap remains in the ability to inform evidence-based sport and health policy in this space. This Current Opinion article demonstrates the effectiveness of headguards in protecting against cuts and lacerations and notes there is insufficient evidence supporting headguard bans. Furthermore, this article highlights a gap in collaborative effort and communication between the IBA and smaller representative bodies, which is an important consideration for future policy reform.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21788,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sports Medicine - Open\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"54\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12084430/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sports Medicine - Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40798-025-00871-4\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports Medicine - Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40798-025-00871-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近国际拳击协会(IBA;AIBA)在保护拳击界运动员健康方面引发了全世界的争议。研究评估了头盔在预防脑震荡、割伤、撕裂和骨折方面的作用。然而,改善这些结果的证据仍然缺乏特征,在这一领域为基于证据的体育和卫生政策提供信息的能力仍然存在差距。这篇文章展示了头盔在防止割伤和撕裂方面的有效性,并指出没有足够的证据支持头盔禁令。此外,本文强调了国际律师协会与较小的代表机构之间在合作努力和沟通方面的差距,这是未来政策改革的重要考虑因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Case for Protective Headguards in Amateur Boxing and Implications for International Policy on Headguard Bans.

The recent prohibition of headguards by the International Boxing Association (IBA; previously AIBA) has sparked worldwide controversy regarding safeguarding the health of athletes in the boxing community. Studies have evaluated the role of headguards in preventing concussion, cuts and lacerations and fractures. However, the evidence for improvement in these outcomes remains poorly characterised and a gap remains in the ability to inform evidence-based sport and health policy in this space. This Current Opinion article demonstrates the effectiveness of headguards in protecting against cuts and lacerations and notes there is insufficient evidence supporting headguard bans. Furthermore, this article highlights a gap in collaborative effort and communication between the IBA and smaller representative bodies, which is an important consideration for future policy reform.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sports Medicine - Open
Sports Medicine - Open SPORT SCIENCES-
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
4.30%
发文量
142
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信