利伐沙班与华法林治疗脑静脉血栓(RWCVT):一项资源有限环境下的随机对照试验

IF 1.6 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Stroke Research and Treatment Pub Date : 2025-05-05 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1155/srat/8893742
Ahmad Alkhawam, Lina Okar, Ibrahem Hanafi, Peyton Murin, Ali Ibrahim, Juman Isstaif, Eman Khashaneh, Rami Z Morsi, Tareq Kass-Hout
{"title":"利伐沙班与华法林治疗脑静脉血栓(RWCVT):一项资源有限环境下的随机对照试验","authors":"Ahmad Alkhawam, Lina Okar, Ibrahem Hanafi, Peyton Murin, Ali Ibrahim, Juman Isstaif, Eman Khashaneh, Rami Z Morsi, Tareq Kass-Hout","doi":"10.1155/srat/8893742","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) is a rare but potentially debilitating form of stroke. Current management guidelines recommend a course of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) followed by an oral vitamin K antagonist. However, there is an emerging body of evidence to support the use of direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) medications. Here, we assess the efficacy of rivaroxaban compared to the standard of care in a resource-limited setting. <b>Methods:</b> The study was designed as a Phase III, prospective, parallel, open-label, randomized controlled trial conducted in three sites in Syria. Seventy-one participants met inclusion criteria and were randomized 1:1 to receive either rivaroxaban or warfarin following initial bridging with LMWH for 3.5-12 days. The primary outcome was functional improvement determined by the Barthel Index. Secondary outcomes were adverse events during follow-up, including CVT recurrence, thrombotic events, intracranial pressure (ICP) requiring shunt placement, extra and intracranial bleeding, neurological deficit, and all-cause mortality. <b>Results:</b> Barthel Index scores did not differ between the study cohorts at 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, or 6-month follow-up. Secondary analysis yielded no difference in rates of adverse effects or return of CVT. Two patients in the warfarin group developed major extracranial bleeds (uterine bleeding); however, there were no other extracranial or intracranial bleeds or thrombotic events reported. Rates of all-cause mortality and all assessed adverse effects were similar between the groups. <b>Conclusion:</b> We offer a prospective, parallel randomized controlled trial that suggests rivaroxaban may have comparable safety and efficacy when compared to warfarin for the treatment of CVT. Importantly, we offer the first randomized control trial of oral anticoagulants for the treatment of CVT in a resource-limited setting, providing support for the evolving literature and suggesting the safety and efficacy of oral anticoagulants in the management of CVT. <b>Trial Registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04569279.</p>","PeriodicalId":22054,"journal":{"name":"Stroke Research and Treatment","volume":"2025 ","pages":"8893742"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12081145/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rivaroxaban Versus Warfarin for the Treatment of Cerebral Venous Thrombosis (RWCVT): A Randomized Controlled Trial in Resource-Limited Setting.\",\"authors\":\"Ahmad Alkhawam, Lina Okar, Ibrahem Hanafi, Peyton Murin, Ali Ibrahim, Juman Isstaif, Eman Khashaneh, Rami Z Morsi, Tareq Kass-Hout\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/srat/8893742\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) is a rare but potentially debilitating form of stroke. Current management guidelines recommend a course of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) followed by an oral vitamin K antagonist. However, there is an emerging body of evidence to support the use of direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) medications. Here, we assess the efficacy of rivaroxaban compared to the standard of care in a resource-limited setting. <b>Methods:</b> The study was designed as a Phase III, prospective, parallel, open-label, randomized controlled trial conducted in three sites in Syria. Seventy-one participants met inclusion criteria and were randomized 1:1 to receive either rivaroxaban or warfarin following initial bridging with LMWH for 3.5-12 days. The primary outcome was functional improvement determined by the Barthel Index. Secondary outcomes were adverse events during follow-up, including CVT recurrence, thrombotic events, intracranial pressure (ICP) requiring shunt placement, extra and intracranial bleeding, neurological deficit, and all-cause mortality. <b>Results:</b> Barthel Index scores did not differ between the study cohorts at 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, or 6-month follow-up. Secondary analysis yielded no difference in rates of adverse effects or return of CVT. Two patients in the warfarin group developed major extracranial bleeds (uterine bleeding); however, there were no other extracranial or intracranial bleeds or thrombotic events reported. Rates of all-cause mortality and all assessed adverse effects were similar between the groups. <b>Conclusion:</b> We offer a prospective, parallel randomized controlled trial that suggests rivaroxaban may have comparable safety and efficacy when compared to warfarin for the treatment of CVT. Importantly, we offer the first randomized control trial of oral anticoagulants for the treatment of CVT in a resource-limited setting, providing support for the evolving literature and suggesting the safety and efficacy of oral anticoagulants in the management of CVT. <b>Trial Registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04569279.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22054,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Stroke Research and Treatment\",\"volume\":\"2025 \",\"pages\":\"8893742\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12081145/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Stroke Research and Treatment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/srat/8893742\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stroke Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/srat/8893742","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:脑静脉血栓形成(CVT)是一种罕见但可能使人衰弱的中风形式。目前的管理指南推荐一个疗程的低分子肝素(LMWH),然后口服维生素K拮抗剂。然而,越来越多的证据支持使用直接口服抗凝药物(DOAC)。在这里,我们评估了在资源有限的情况下,利伐沙班与标准治疗的疗效。方法:该研究被设计为一项III期、前瞻性、平行、开放标签、随机对照试验,在叙利亚的三个地点进行。71名参与者符合纳入标准,在与低分子肝素进行3.5-12天的初始桥接后,以1:1的比例随机分配接受利伐沙班或华法林治疗。主要结果是由Barthel指数确定的功能改善。次要结局是随访期间的不良事件,包括CVT复发、血栓形成事件、需要放置分流器的颅内压(ICP)、颅内外出血、神经功能缺损和全因死亡率。结果:在1、2、3、4、5或6个月的随访中,Barthel指数得分在研究队列之间没有差异。二次分析没有发现不良反应或CVT复发率的差异。华法林组2例出现颅内大出血(子宫出血);然而,没有其他颅外或颅内出血或血栓事件的报道。两组之间的全因死亡率和所有评估的不良反应相似。结论:我们提供了一项前瞻性,平行随机对照试验,表明与华法林相比,利伐沙班治疗CVT可能具有相当的安全性和有效性。重要的是,我们提供了第一个在资源有限的情况下口服抗凝剂治疗CVT的随机对照试验,为不断发展的文献提供了支持,并表明口服抗凝剂治疗CVT的安全性和有效性。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT04569279。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rivaroxaban Versus Warfarin for the Treatment of Cerebral Venous Thrombosis (RWCVT): A Randomized Controlled Trial in Resource-Limited Setting.

Background: Cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) is a rare but potentially debilitating form of stroke. Current management guidelines recommend a course of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) followed by an oral vitamin K antagonist. However, there is an emerging body of evidence to support the use of direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) medications. Here, we assess the efficacy of rivaroxaban compared to the standard of care in a resource-limited setting. Methods: The study was designed as a Phase III, prospective, parallel, open-label, randomized controlled trial conducted in three sites in Syria. Seventy-one participants met inclusion criteria and were randomized 1:1 to receive either rivaroxaban or warfarin following initial bridging with LMWH for 3.5-12 days. The primary outcome was functional improvement determined by the Barthel Index. Secondary outcomes were adverse events during follow-up, including CVT recurrence, thrombotic events, intracranial pressure (ICP) requiring shunt placement, extra and intracranial bleeding, neurological deficit, and all-cause mortality. Results: Barthel Index scores did not differ between the study cohorts at 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, or 6-month follow-up. Secondary analysis yielded no difference in rates of adverse effects or return of CVT. Two patients in the warfarin group developed major extracranial bleeds (uterine bleeding); however, there were no other extracranial or intracranial bleeds or thrombotic events reported. Rates of all-cause mortality and all assessed adverse effects were similar between the groups. Conclusion: We offer a prospective, parallel randomized controlled trial that suggests rivaroxaban may have comparable safety and efficacy when compared to warfarin for the treatment of CVT. Importantly, we offer the first randomized control trial of oral anticoagulants for the treatment of CVT in a resource-limited setting, providing support for the evolving literature and suggesting the safety and efficacy of oral anticoagulants in the management of CVT. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04569279.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Stroke Research and Treatment
Stroke Research and Treatment PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信