Mirko Duradoni, Franca Paola Severino, Giulia Colombini, Andrea Guazzini
{"title":"消费主义量表(FOMS)的开发与验证:一种担心缺失超前消费主义的新措施。","authors":"Mirko Duradoni, Franca Paola Severino, Giulia Colombini, Andrea Guazzini","doi":"10.1177/00332941251343548","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In an increasingly digital world, shopping and virtual dynamics have converged, leading people to shop online for various reasons. Recently, a new concept has emerged: purchasing driven by Fear of Missing Out (FoMO), leading to the phenomenon of \"Fomsumerism,\" a fusion of \"FoMO\" and \"consumerism.\" In the literature, Fomsumerism is typically measured by separately assessing FoMO and consumerism-related factors, with an assumed correlation between them. Given the absence of an integrated tool, this article describes the development and validation of the FOMS (Fomsumerism) scale, designed to capture the most recognized factors in online consumption behaviors driven by FoMO. The study examined the connections between FOMS scores, FoMO, and Need for Online Social Feedback (NfOSF). In the first study, we included 397 Italian-speaking participants (55.9% female) with an average age of 26.83 years (SD = 9.39). An exploratory factor analysis (EFA) revealed a four-factor structure, identifying the dimensions of self-determination, social comparison, social belongingness, and personal agency. The second study included 418 Italian-speaking participants (63.2% female) with an average age of 29.27 years (SD = 11.57). The four-factor structure demonstrated strong reliability for each subscale and was confirmed through confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The study found a positive but not fully overlapping link between FoMO and Fomsumerism, indicating that FoMO is a construct distinct from Fomsumerism. Additionally, FOMS scores showed positive associations with NfOSF outcomes, highlighting that as the perceived need for feedback increases, so does the tendency to display purchases on social media to receive it. Overall, the FOMS Scale proved to be a valid and reliable tool for measuring FoMO-induced purchase propensity in a comprehensive and integrated manner.</p>","PeriodicalId":21149,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Reports","volume":" ","pages":"332941251343548"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and Validation of the Fomsumerism Scale (FOMS): A New Measure for Fear of Missing Out-Driven Consumerism.\",\"authors\":\"Mirko Duradoni, Franca Paola Severino, Giulia Colombini, Andrea Guazzini\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00332941251343548\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In an increasingly digital world, shopping and virtual dynamics have converged, leading people to shop online for various reasons. Recently, a new concept has emerged: purchasing driven by Fear of Missing Out (FoMO), leading to the phenomenon of \\\"Fomsumerism,\\\" a fusion of \\\"FoMO\\\" and \\\"consumerism.\\\" In the literature, Fomsumerism is typically measured by separately assessing FoMO and consumerism-related factors, with an assumed correlation between them. Given the absence of an integrated tool, this article describes the development and validation of the FOMS (Fomsumerism) scale, designed to capture the most recognized factors in online consumption behaviors driven by FoMO. The study examined the connections between FOMS scores, FoMO, and Need for Online Social Feedback (NfOSF). In the first study, we included 397 Italian-speaking participants (55.9% female) with an average age of 26.83 years (SD = 9.39). An exploratory factor analysis (EFA) revealed a four-factor structure, identifying the dimensions of self-determination, social comparison, social belongingness, and personal agency. The second study included 418 Italian-speaking participants (63.2% female) with an average age of 29.27 years (SD = 11.57). The four-factor structure demonstrated strong reliability for each subscale and was confirmed through confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The study found a positive but not fully overlapping link between FoMO and Fomsumerism, indicating that FoMO is a construct distinct from Fomsumerism. Additionally, FOMS scores showed positive associations with NfOSF outcomes, highlighting that as the perceived need for feedback increases, so does the tendency to display purchases on social media to receive it. Overall, the FOMS Scale proved to be a valid and reliable tool for measuring FoMO-induced purchase propensity in a comprehensive and integrated manner.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21149,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychological Reports\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"332941251343548\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychological Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941251343548\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Reports","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941251343548","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在一个日益数字化的世界里,购物和虚拟动态已经融合,导致人们出于各种原因在网上购物。最近出现了一种新的概念:“错失恐惧症”(Fear of Missing Out,简称FoMO)驱动的购买,导致了“错失恐惧症”(FoMO)和“消费主义”(consumerism)的融合,即“Fomsumerism”。在文献中,formsumerism通常通过单独评估FoMO和消费主义相关因素来衡量,并假设它们之间存在相关性。鉴于缺乏集成工具,本文描述了FOMS (FoMO消费主义)量表的开发和验证,旨在捕捉由FoMO驱动的在线消费行为中最公认的因素。该研究考察了FOMS分数、FoMO和在线社会反馈需求(NfOSF)之间的联系。在第一项研究中,我们纳入了397名说意大利语的参与者(55.9%为女性),平均年龄为26.83岁(SD = 9.39)。探索性因素分析(EFA)揭示了一个四因素结构,确定了自我决定、社会比较、社会归属感和个人能动性的维度。第二项研究包括418名说意大利语的参与者(63.2%为女性),平均年龄为29.27岁(SD = 11.57)。四因子结构在各子量表上具有较强的信度,并通过验证性因子分析(CFA)得到证实。研究发现,FoMO和Fomsumerism之间存在积极但不完全重叠的联系,表明FoMO是一种不同于Fomsumerism的结构。此外,FOMS分数显示与NfOSF结果呈正相关,突出表明,随着对反馈需求的感知增加,在社交媒体上展示购买内容以接受反馈的倾向也会增加。总体而言,FOMS量表被证明是一个有效和可靠的工具,可以全面、综合地测量FOMS诱导的购买倾向。
Development and Validation of the Fomsumerism Scale (FOMS): A New Measure for Fear of Missing Out-Driven Consumerism.
In an increasingly digital world, shopping and virtual dynamics have converged, leading people to shop online for various reasons. Recently, a new concept has emerged: purchasing driven by Fear of Missing Out (FoMO), leading to the phenomenon of "Fomsumerism," a fusion of "FoMO" and "consumerism." In the literature, Fomsumerism is typically measured by separately assessing FoMO and consumerism-related factors, with an assumed correlation between them. Given the absence of an integrated tool, this article describes the development and validation of the FOMS (Fomsumerism) scale, designed to capture the most recognized factors in online consumption behaviors driven by FoMO. The study examined the connections between FOMS scores, FoMO, and Need for Online Social Feedback (NfOSF). In the first study, we included 397 Italian-speaking participants (55.9% female) with an average age of 26.83 years (SD = 9.39). An exploratory factor analysis (EFA) revealed a four-factor structure, identifying the dimensions of self-determination, social comparison, social belongingness, and personal agency. The second study included 418 Italian-speaking participants (63.2% female) with an average age of 29.27 years (SD = 11.57). The four-factor structure demonstrated strong reliability for each subscale and was confirmed through confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The study found a positive but not fully overlapping link between FoMO and Fomsumerism, indicating that FoMO is a construct distinct from Fomsumerism. Additionally, FOMS scores showed positive associations with NfOSF outcomes, highlighting that as the perceived need for feedback increases, so does the tendency to display purchases on social media to receive it. Overall, the FOMS Scale proved to be a valid and reliable tool for measuring FoMO-induced purchase propensity in a comprehensive and integrated manner.