吸烟与易受错误信息影响之间的联系。

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Michal Piksa, Magdalena Zaniewska, Agata Cieslik-Starkiewicz, Jonas Kunst, Mikolaj Morzy, Jan Piasecki, Rafal Rygula
{"title":"吸烟与易受错误信息影响之间的联系。","authors":"Michal Piksa, Magdalena Zaniewska, Agata Cieslik-Starkiewicz, Jonas Kunst, Mikolaj Morzy, Jan Piasecki, Rafal Rygula","doi":"10.1007/s00213-025-06802-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study investigates the relationship between tobacco smoking and susceptibility to misinformation, an area that has been underexplored despite its potential implications for public health and media literacy. Smoking behavior, along with the pharmacological components present in tobacco, is often associated with habitual and cognitive patterns that may influence an individual's ability to critically evaluate and discern false information. By examining this potential link, the present study aims to shed light on the broader implications of smoking for societal challenges, such as the spread of misinformation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A quantitative online survey was conducted to collect data from a sample of 1,575 adult participants (M<sub>age</sub> = 41.37, SD = 13.58; females: 54%, males: 46%) from the United Kingdom. Participants were categorized into three groups based on their smoking status: individuals who had smoked tobacco less than an hour before the study (n = 550), individuals who had smoked more than an hour before the study (n = 472), and non-smokers (n = 553). The survey incorporated questions assessing susceptibility to misinformation by annotating certain claims as false or true, and other instruments in order to control for impulsivity, stress level, physiological arousal and education level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Smokers exhibited a lower ability to correctly recognize false claims than non-smokers. There was no difference between these groups in true news recognition.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The study, controlling for confounding factors, such as education and perceived stress, reveals that tobacco smoking may be associated with misinformation susceptibility. Further laboratory-based research should be conducted to explore the mechanisms underlying the observed relationship.</p>","PeriodicalId":20783,"journal":{"name":"Psychopharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The link between tobacco smoking and susceptibility to misinformation.\",\"authors\":\"Michal Piksa, Magdalena Zaniewska, Agata Cieslik-Starkiewicz, Jonas Kunst, Mikolaj Morzy, Jan Piasecki, Rafal Rygula\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00213-025-06802-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study investigates the relationship between tobacco smoking and susceptibility to misinformation, an area that has been underexplored despite its potential implications for public health and media literacy. Smoking behavior, along with the pharmacological components present in tobacco, is often associated with habitual and cognitive patterns that may influence an individual's ability to critically evaluate and discern false information. By examining this potential link, the present study aims to shed light on the broader implications of smoking for societal challenges, such as the spread of misinformation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A quantitative online survey was conducted to collect data from a sample of 1,575 adult participants (M<sub>age</sub> = 41.37, SD = 13.58; females: 54%, males: 46%) from the United Kingdom. Participants were categorized into three groups based on their smoking status: individuals who had smoked tobacco less than an hour before the study (n = 550), individuals who had smoked more than an hour before the study (n = 472), and non-smokers (n = 553). The survey incorporated questions assessing susceptibility to misinformation by annotating certain claims as false or true, and other instruments in order to control for impulsivity, stress level, physiological arousal and education level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Smokers exhibited a lower ability to correctly recognize false claims than non-smokers. There was no difference between these groups in true news recognition.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The study, controlling for confounding factors, such as education and perceived stress, reveals that tobacco smoking may be associated with misinformation susceptibility. Further laboratory-based research should be conducted to explore the mechanisms underlying the observed relationship.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20783,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychopharmacology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychopharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-025-06802-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-025-06802-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言:本研究调查了吸烟与对错误信息的易感性之间的关系,尽管这一领域对公共卫生和媒体素养有潜在影响,但尚未得到充分探索。吸烟行为以及烟草中存在的药理成分通常与习惯和认知模式有关,这些模式可能影响个人批判性评估和辨别虚假信息的能力。通过研究这种潜在的联系,本研究旨在揭示吸烟对社会挑战的更广泛影响,比如错误信息的传播。方法:采用在线定量调查的方法,收集1575名成人(Mage = 41.37, SD = 13.58;女性:54%,男性:46%)来自英国。参与者根据吸烟状况被分为三组:在研究前不到一小时吸烟的人(n = 550),在研究前吸烟超过一小时的人(n = 472)和不吸烟的人(n = 553)。该调查纳入了评估对错误信息的敏感性的问题,通过将某些说法注释为假或真,以及其他工具来控制冲动,压力水平,生理唤醒和教育水平。结果:吸烟者比非吸烟者表现出较低的正确识别虚假声明的能力。这两组在真实的新闻识别方面没有差异。讨论:该研究控制了混杂因素,如教育和感知压力,表明吸烟可能与错误信息易感性有关。应该进行进一步的实验室研究,以探索所观察到的关系背后的机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The link between tobacco smoking and susceptibility to misinformation.

Introduction: This study investigates the relationship between tobacco smoking and susceptibility to misinformation, an area that has been underexplored despite its potential implications for public health and media literacy. Smoking behavior, along with the pharmacological components present in tobacco, is often associated with habitual and cognitive patterns that may influence an individual's ability to critically evaluate and discern false information. By examining this potential link, the present study aims to shed light on the broader implications of smoking for societal challenges, such as the spread of misinformation.

Methods: A quantitative online survey was conducted to collect data from a sample of 1,575 adult participants (Mage = 41.37, SD = 13.58; females: 54%, males: 46%) from the United Kingdom. Participants were categorized into three groups based on their smoking status: individuals who had smoked tobacco less than an hour before the study (n = 550), individuals who had smoked more than an hour before the study (n = 472), and non-smokers (n = 553). The survey incorporated questions assessing susceptibility to misinformation by annotating certain claims as false or true, and other instruments in order to control for impulsivity, stress level, physiological arousal and education level.

Results: Smokers exhibited a lower ability to correctly recognize false claims than non-smokers. There was no difference between these groups in true news recognition.

Discussion: The study, controlling for confounding factors, such as education and perceived stress, reveals that tobacco smoking may be associated with misinformation susceptibility. Further laboratory-based research should be conducted to explore the mechanisms underlying the observed relationship.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychopharmacology
Psychopharmacology 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
257
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Official Journal of the European Behavioural Pharmacology Society (EBPS) Psychopharmacology is an international journal that covers the broad topic of elucidating mechanisms by which drugs affect behavior. The scope of the journal encompasses the following fields: Human Psychopharmacology: Experimental This section includes manuscripts describing the effects of drugs on mood, behavior, cognition and physiology in humans. The journal encourages submissions that involve brain imaging, genetics, neuroendocrinology, and developmental topics. Usually manuscripts in this section describe studies conducted under controlled conditions, but occasionally descriptive or observational studies are also considered. Human Psychopharmacology: Clinical and Translational This section comprises studies addressing the broad intersection of drugs and psychiatric illness. This includes not only clinical trials and studies of drug usage and metabolism, drug surveillance, and pharmacoepidemiology, but also work utilizing the entire range of clinically relevant methodologies, including neuroimaging, pharmacogenetics, cognitive science, biomarkers, and others. Work directed toward the translation of preclinical to clinical knowledge is especially encouraged. The key feature of submissions to this section is that they involve a focus on clinical aspects. Preclinical psychopharmacology: Behavioral and Neural This section considers reports on the effects of compounds with defined chemical structures on any aspect of behavior, in particular when correlated with neurochemical effects, in species other than humans. Manuscripts containing neuroscientific techniques in combination with behavior are welcome. We encourage reports of studies that provide insight into the mechanisms of drug action, at the behavioral and molecular levels. Preclinical Psychopharmacology: Translational This section considers manuscripts that enhance the confidence in a central mechanism that could be of therapeutic value for psychiatric or neurological patients, using disease-relevant preclinical models and tests, or that report on preclinical manipulations and challenges that have the potential to be translated to the clinic. Studies aiming at the refinement of preclinical models based upon clinical findings (back-translation) will also be considered. The journal particularly encourages submissions that integrate measures of target tissue exposure, activity on the molecular target and/or modulation of the targeted biochemical pathways. Preclinical Psychopharmacology: Molecular, Genetic and Epigenetic This section focuses on the molecular and cellular actions of neuropharmacological agents / drugs, and the identification / validation of drug targets affecting the CNS in health and disease. We particularly encourage studies that provide insight into the mechanisms of drug action at the molecular level. Manuscripts containing evidence for genetic or epigenetic effects on neurochemistry or behavior are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信