泰国南部抑郁症患者与一般人群感知家庭状态和功能的比较。

IF 2.9 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2025-05-16 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0323866
Jarurin Pitanupong, Kwanpond Traivaranon, Napakkawat Buathong
{"title":"泰国南部抑郁症患者与一般人群感知家庭状态和功能的比较。","authors":"Jarurin Pitanupong, Kwanpond Traivaranon, Napakkawat Buathong","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0323866","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to examine perceived family functioning among individuals with depression, then compare these perceptions with those of the general population.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted among individuals with depression at Songklanagarind Hospital and individuals from the general population; from May to July 2024. Participants completed three questionnaires: 1) Personal and demographic inquiry, 2) the Family State and Functioning Assessment Scale (FSFAS-25), and 3) the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). Data analysis involved descriptive statistics, Chi-square or Fisher's exact test, Wilcoxon rank sum test and Student's t-test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study compared 41 individuals with depression with 41 from the general population; revealing significant differences in family functioning scores. The depression group reported lower median family functioning scores (76 [IQR 64-84]) compared with the general population (87 [IQR 77-93]). Fewer individuals in the depression group reported high total family functioning scores (56.1% vs. 82.9%, p = 0.016). They also showed lower percentages in family support (61.0% vs. 95.1%, p < 0.001) and discipline dimensions (46.3% vs. 78.0%, p = 0.006). Furthermore, those with residual depression symptoms (PHQ-9 having a score of nine or higher) showed significant differences in family support (37.5% vs. 76.0%, p = 0.033) and emotional status (18.8% vs. 60.0%, p = 0.023) compared with those without residual depression symptoms.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Individuals with depression demonstrated lower levels of family functioning compared with the general population. Acknowledging and addressing the influence of family dynamics on the development and persistence of the disorder may be essential for improving treatment outcomes. Integrating these factors into person-centered mental health interventions can lead to more comprehensive, individualized, and effective care.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"20 5","pages":"e0323866"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12083788/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of perceived family state and functioning among individuals with depression and general population in Southern Thailand.\",\"authors\":\"Jarurin Pitanupong, Kwanpond Traivaranon, Napakkawat Buathong\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pone.0323866\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to examine perceived family functioning among individuals with depression, then compare these perceptions with those of the general population.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted among individuals with depression at Songklanagarind Hospital and individuals from the general population; from May to July 2024. Participants completed three questionnaires: 1) Personal and demographic inquiry, 2) the Family State and Functioning Assessment Scale (FSFAS-25), and 3) the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). Data analysis involved descriptive statistics, Chi-square or Fisher's exact test, Wilcoxon rank sum test and Student's t-test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study compared 41 individuals with depression with 41 from the general population; revealing significant differences in family functioning scores. The depression group reported lower median family functioning scores (76 [IQR 64-84]) compared with the general population (87 [IQR 77-93]). Fewer individuals in the depression group reported high total family functioning scores (56.1% vs. 82.9%, p = 0.016). They also showed lower percentages in family support (61.0% vs. 95.1%, p < 0.001) and discipline dimensions (46.3% vs. 78.0%, p = 0.006). Furthermore, those with residual depression symptoms (PHQ-9 having a score of nine or higher) showed significant differences in family support (37.5% vs. 76.0%, p = 0.033) and emotional status (18.8% vs. 60.0%, p = 0.023) compared with those without residual depression symptoms.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Individuals with depression demonstrated lower levels of family functioning compared with the general population. Acknowledging and addressing the influence of family dynamics on the development and persistence of the disorder may be essential for improving treatment outcomes. Integrating these factors into person-centered mental health interventions can lead to more comprehensive, individualized, and effective care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"volume\":\"20 5\",\"pages\":\"e0323866\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12083788/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0323866\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0323866","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在研究抑郁症患者的感知家庭功能,然后将这些感知与一般人群的感知进行比较。材料和方法:在Songklanagarind医院的抑郁症患者和普通人群中进行横断面研究;从2024年5月到7月。参与者完成三份问卷:1)个人和人口统计调查,2)家庭状态和功能评估量表(FSFAS-25)和3)患者健康问卷(PHQ-9)。数据分析包括描述性统计、卡方检验或费雪精确检验、Wilcoxon秩和检验和学生t检验。结果:该研究比较了41名抑郁症患者和41名普通人群;揭示了家庭功能得分的显著差异。抑郁症组的家庭功能评分中位数(76分[IQR 64-84])低于普通人群(87分[IQR 77-93])。抑郁症组中报告家庭功能总分较高的个体较少(56.1%比82.9%,p = 0.016)。他们在家庭支持(61.0%比95.1%,p < 0.001)和纪律维度(46.3%比78.0%,p = 0.006)方面的百分比也较低。有抑郁症状者(PHQ-9分9分及以上)在家庭支持(37.5%比76.0%,p = 0.033)和情绪状态(18.8%比60.0%,p = 0.023)方面与无抑郁症状者有显著差异。结论:与一般人群相比,抑郁症患者的家庭功能水平较低。承认和解决家庭动态对障碍的发展和持续的影响可能是改善治疗结果的必要条件。将这些因素整合到以人为本的心理健康干预措施中,可以带来更全面、个性化和有效的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of perceived family state and functioning among individuals with depression and general population in Southern Thailand.

Purpose: This study aimed to examine perceived family functioning among individuals with depression, then compare these perceptions with those of the general population.

Materials and methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among individuals with depression at Songklanagarind Hospital and individuals from the general population; from May to July 2024. Participants completed three questionnaires: 1) Personal and demographic inquiry, 2) the Family State and Functioning Assessment Scale (FSFAS-25), and 3) the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). Data analysis involved descriptive statistics, Chi-square or Fisher's exact test, Wilcoxon rank sum test and Student's t-test.

Results: The study compared 41 individuals with depression with 41 from the general population; revealing significant differences in family functioning scores. The depression group reported lower median family functioning scores (76 [IQR 64-84]) compared with the general population (87 [IQR 77-93]). Fewer individuals in the depression group reported high total family functioning scores (56.1% vs. 82.9%, p = 0.016). They also showed lower percentages in family support (61.0% vs. 95.1%, p < 0.001) and discipline dimensions (46.3% vs. 78.0%, p = 0.006). Furthermore, those with residual depression symptoms (PHQ-9 having a score of nine or higher) showed significant differences in family support (37.5% vs. 76.0%, p = 0.033) and emotional status (18.8% vs. 60.0%, p = 0.023) compared with those without residual depression symptoms.

Conclusion: Individuals with depression demonstrated lower levels of family functioning compared with the general population. Acknowledging and addressing the influence of family dynamics on the development and persistence of the disorder may be essential for improving treatment outcomes. Integrating these factors into person-centered mental health interventions can lead to more comprehensive, individualized, and effective care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
14242
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信