人工耳蜗磁共振成像的疼痛、安全性和图像质量:一项前瞻性试验。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Evan J Patel, Xin Wu, Joel McLouth, Daniel Q Sun, Bryan K Ward, Jeffrey D Sharon
{"title":"人工耳蜗磁共振成像的疼痛、安全性和图像质量:一项前瞻性试验。","authors":"Evan J Patel, Xin Wu, Joel McLouth, Daniel Q Sun, Bryan K Ward, Jeffrey D Sharon","doi":"10.1002/ohn.1301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate whether rotating cochlear implant (CI) magnets improve patient comfort and preserve scan usability during magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Prospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Two tertiary academic centers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult patients with CIs who underwent MRI of any body region were included. The primary outcome was the mean change in pain score from baseline (before any study procedure) to the highest reported pain level during MRI with a CI magnet in place. Secondary outcomes included patient-reported survey responses regarding their MRI experience and the interpretability of the brain MRI scans involving rotating magnets, as assessed by two independent, blinded neuroradiologists.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-three MRI scans (21 patients) with CIs were analyzed. Eleven scans (47.8%) involved implants containing internal magnets designed to self-align with the magnetic field. The mean pain-score difference unrelated to headwrap use was significantly lower for rotating magnet devices than fixed magnets (0.7 vs 4.0, P = .02). No magnet displacement or depolarization occurred. In six MRI brain sequences, the mean maximal signal-loss artifact measured 6.1 cm (SD 1.2 cm) on axial images for rotating magnet devices. When assessing if the MRI could answer the question for which the scan was ordered, 100% of responses (n = 12) ranged from slightly agree to strongly agree. The majority of patients (70.0%) indicated they would undergo another MRI if medically necessary.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CIs containing rotatable magnets reduce MRI-related pain compared to those with fixed magnets. Although the magnets produce a measurable artifact, it does not substantially compromise scan utility in the majority of cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":19707,"journal":{"name":"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pain, Safety, and Image Quality of Magnetic Resonance Imaging With Cochlear Implants: A Prospective Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Evan J Patel, Xin Wu, Joel McLouth, Daniel Q Sun, Bryan K Ward, Jeffrey D Sharon\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ohn.1301\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate whether rotating cochlear implant (CI) magnets improve patient comfort and preserve scan usability during magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Prospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Two tertiary academic centers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult patients with CIs who underwent MRI of any body region were included. The primary outcome was the mean change in pain score from baseline (before any study procedure) to the highest reported pain level during MRI with a CI magnet in place. Secondary outcomes included patient-reported survey responses regarding their MRI experience and the interpretability of the brain MRI scans involving rotating magnets, as assessed by two independent, blinded neuroradiologists.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-three MRI scans (21 patients) with CIs were analyzed. Eleven scans (47.8%) involved implants containing internal magnets designed to self-align with the magnetic field. The mean pain-score difference unrelated to headwrap use was significantly lower for rotating magnet devices than fixed magnets (0.7 vs 4.0, P = .02). No magnet displacement or depolarization occurred. In six MRI brain sequences, the mean maximal signal-loss artifact measured 6.1 cm (SD 1.2 cm) on axial images for rotating magnet devices. When assessing if the MRI could answer the question for which the scan was ordered, 100% of responses (n = 12) ranged from slightly agree to strongly agree. The majority of patients (70.0%) indicated they would undergo another MRI if medically necessary.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CIs containing rotatable magnets reduce MRI-related pain compared to those with fixed magnets. Although the magnets produce a measurable artifact, it does not substantially compromise scan utility in the majority of cases.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19707,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ohn.1301\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ohn.1301","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价旋转人工耳蜗(CI)磁体在磁共振成像(MRI)中是否能改善患者的舒适度并保持扫描的可用性。研究设计:前瞻性队列研究。环境:两个高等教育中心。方法:纳入接受MRI检查的成年CIs患者。主要结果是疼痛评分的平均变化,从基线(任何研究程序之前)到MRI中CI磁铁放置时报告的最高疼痛水平。次要结果包括由两名独立的盲法神经放射学家评估的患者报告的关于其MRI经历的调查反应和涉及旋转磁铁的大脑MRI扫描的可解释性。结果:分析了23例(21例)CIs的MRI扫描结果。11次扫描(47.8%)涉及内置磁铁的植入物,这些磁铁被设计成与磁场自对齐。旋转磁铁装置的平均疼痛评分差异与头套使用无关,显著低于固定磁铁装置(0.7 vs 4.0, P = 0.02)。没有发生磁体位移或去极化。在六个MRI脑序列中,旋转磁铁装置的轴向图像上的最大信号损失平均为6.1 cm (SD为1.2 cm)。当评估MRI是否能回答预定扫描的问题时,100%的回答(n = 12)从稍微同意到非常同意不等。大多数患者(70.0%)表示,如果医学上有必要,他们将再次接受MRI检查。结论:与固定磁体相比,含有可旋转磁体的CIs可减轻mri相关疼痛。虽然磁体产生可测量的伪影,但在大多数情况下,它不会实质性地损害扫描效用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pain, Safety, and Image Quality of Magnetic Resonance Imaging With Cochlear Implants: A Prospective Trial.

Objective: To evaluate whether rotating cochlear implant (CI) magnets improve patient comfort and preserve scan usability during magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Study design: Prospective cohort study.

Setting: Two tertiary academic centers.

Methods: Adult patients with CIs who underwent MRI of any body region were included. The primary outcome was the mean change in pain score from baseline (before any study procedure) to the highest reported pain level during MRI with a CI magnet in place. Secondary outcomes included patient-reported survey responses regarding their MRI experience and the interpretability of the brain MRI scans involving rotating magnets, as assessed by two independent, blinded neuroradiologists.

Results: Twenty-three MRI scans (21 patients) with CIs were analyzed. Eleven scans (47.8%) involved implants containing internal magnets designed to self-align with the magnetic field. The mean pain-score difference unrelated to headwrap use was significantly lower for rotating magnet devices than fixed magnets (0.7 vs 4.0, P = .02). No magnet displacement or depolarization occurred. In six MRI brain sequences, the mean maximal signal-loss artifact measured 6.1 cm (SD 1.2 cm) on axial images for rotating magnet devices. When assessing if the MRI could answer the question for which the scan was ordered, 100% of responses (n = 12) ranged from slightly agree to strongly agree. The majority of patients (70.0%) indicated they would undergo another MRI if medically necessary.

Conclusion: CIs containing rotatable magnets reduce MRI-related pain compared to those with fixed magnets. Although the magnets produce a measurable artifact, it does not substantially compromise scan utility in the majority of cases.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery
Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.90%
发文量
250
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery (OTO-HNS) is the official peer-reviewed publication of the American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Foundation. The mission of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery is to publish contemporary, ethical, clinically relevant information in otolaryngology, head and neck surgery (ear, nose, throat, head, and neck disorders) that can be used by otolaryngologists, clinicians, scientists, and specialists to improve patient care and public health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信