经动脉化疗栓塞联合酪氨酸激酶和免疫检查点抑制剂治疗肝癌的有效性和安全性:一项荟萃分析

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Qingteng Zeng, Renjie Zhang, Xuan Zheng, Xiaobing Li, Qinghua He, Ruikun Zhang, Shenfeng Wu, Boqian Chen
{"title":"经动脉化疗栓塞联合酪氨酸激酶和免疫检查点抑制剂治疗肝癌的有效性和安全性:一项荟萃分析","authors":"Qingteng Zeng, Renjie Zhang, Xuan Zheng, Xiaobing Li, Qinghua He, Ruikun Zhang, Shenfeng Wu, Boqian Chen","doi":"10.1159/000546337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Standard treatments for intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), such as transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), offer limited efficacy, necessitating the exploration of additional therapeutic strategies. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown potential to enhance HCC outcomes when combined with TACE. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate safety and efficacy of TACE, TKIs and ICIs (TACE+T+I) combination compared to TACE with TKIs alone (TACE+T) in patients with HCC. Methods A systematic search was performed in \"PubMed\", \"Google Scholar\", \"Cochrane Library\", \"Web of Science\", \"Scopus\", and \"Embase\" databases on November 1, 2024. Studies involving patients with HCC comparing TACE+T+I versus TACE+T were included. Efficacy outcomes including objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), and adverse events, were extracted. Meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.4. Results Seventeen studies were included for analysis. Pooled analysis showed a markedly improvement in ORR (risk ratio (RR)=1.57, 95%CI:1.36-1.80, P<0.00001) and DCR (RR=1.13, 95%CI:1.06-1.20, P=0.0004) for TACE+T+I regimen over TACE+T. TACE+T+I group also showed a marked benefit in OS (hazard ratio (HR)=0.37, 95%CI:0.29-0.48, P<0.0001) and PFS (HR=0.44, 95%CI:0.36-0.53, P<0.0001). No differences in adverse events were detected between the two groups, indicating comparable tolerability. Conclusions The findings suggest that the addition of ICIs to TACE and TKI therapy offers substantial efficacy benefits without increasing toxicity for HCC patients. This combination therapy shows potential to improve DCR, ORR, PFS and OS, underscoring the value of immunotherapy in enhancing outcomes in HCC. However, further randomized trials with standardized treatment protocols are needed to confirm these results and inform clinical guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":19543,"journal":{"name":"Oncology Research and Treatment","volume":" ","pages":"1-23"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness and safety of combining transarterial chemoembolization with tyrosine kinase and immune checkpoint inhibitors in hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Qingteng Zeng, Renjie Zhang, Xuan Zheng, Xiaobing Li, Qinghua He, Ruikun Zhang, Shenfeng Wu, Boqian Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000546337\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Background Standard treatments for intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), such as transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), offer limited efficacy, necessitating the exploration of additional therapeutic strategies. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown potential to enhance HCC outcomes when combined with TACE. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate safety and efficacy of TACE, TKIs and ICIs (TACE+T+I) combination compared to TACE with TKIs alone (TACE+T) in patients with HCC. Methods A systematic search was performed in \\\"PubMed\\\", \\\"Google Scholar\\\", \\\"Cochrane Library\\\", \\\"Web of Science\\\", \\\"Scopus\\\", and \\\"Embase\\\" databases on November 1, 2024. Studies involving patients with HCC comparing TACE+T+I versus TACE+T were included. Efficacy outcomes including objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), and adverse events, were extracted. Meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.4. Results Seventeen studies were included for analysis. Pooled analysis showed a markedly improvement in ORR (risk ratio (RR)=1.57, 95%CI:1.36-1.80, P<0.00001) and DCR (RR=1.13, 95%CI:1.06-1.20, P=0.0004) for TACE+T+I regimen over TACE+T. TACE+T+I group also showed a marked benefit in OS (hazard ratio (HR)=0.37, 95%CI:0.29-0.48, P<0.0001) and PFS (HR=0.44, 95%CI:0.36-0.53, P<0.0001). No differences in adverse events were detected between the two groups, indicating comparable tolerability. Conclusions The findings suggest that the addition of ICIs to TACE and TKI therapy offers substantial efficacy benefits without increasing toxicity for HCC patients. This combination therapy shows potential to improve DCR, ORR, PFS and OS, underscoring the value of immunotherapy in enhancing outcomes in HCC. However, further randomized trials with standardized treatment protocols are needed to confirm these results and inform clinical guidelines.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19543,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oncology Research and Treatment\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-23\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oncology Research and Treatment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000546337\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncology Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000546337","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:中期肝细胞癌(HCC)的标准治疗方法,如经动脉化疗栓塞(TACE),疗效有限,需要探索其他治疗策略。酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKIs)和免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)与TACE联合使用时显示出增强HCC预后的潜力。本荟萃分析旨在评价TACE、TKIs和ICIs (TACE+T+I)联合治疗HCC患者的安全性和有效性,并与TACE单独治疗TKIs (TACE+T)进行比较。方法系统检索2024年11月1日的“PubMed”、“谷歌Scholar”、“Cochrane Library”、“Web of Science”、“Scopus”和“Embase”数据库。包括肝癌患者比较TACE+T+I和TACE+T的研究。提取疗效指标,包括客观缓解率(ORR)、疾病控制率(DCR)、总生存期(OS)、无进展生存期(PFS)和不良事件。采用RevMan 5.4进行meta分析。结果纳入17项研究进行分析。合并分析显示,ORR显著改善(风险比(RR)=1.57, 95%CI:1.36 ~ 1.80, P
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effectiveness and safety of combining transarterial chemoembolization with tyrosine kinase and immune checkpoint inhibitors in hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis.

Background Standard treatments for intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), such as transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), offer limited efficacy, necessitating the exploration of additional therapeutic strategies. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown potential to enhance HCC outcomes when combined with TACE. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate safety and efficacy of TACE, TKIs and ICIs (TACE+T+I) combination compared to TACE with TKIs alone (TACE+T) in patients with HCC. Methods A systematic search was performed in "PubMed", "Google Scholar", "Cochrane Library", "Web of Science", "Scopus", and "Embase" databases on November 1, 2024. Studies involving patients with HCC comparing TACE+T+I versus TACE+T were included. Efficacy outcomes including objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), and adverse events, were extracted. Meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.4. Results Seventeen studies were included for analysis. Pooled analysis showed a markedly improvement in ORR (risk ratio (RR)=1.57, 95%CI:1.36-1.80, P<0.00001) and DCR (RR=1.13, 95%CI:1.06-1.20, P=0.0004) for TACE+T+I regimen over TACE+T. TACE+T+I group also showed a marked benefit in OS (hazard ratio (HR)=0.37, 95%CI:0.29-0.48, P<0.0001) and PFS (HR=0.44, 95%CI:0.36-0.53, P<0.0001). No differences in adverse events were detected between the two groups, indicating comparable tolerability. Conclusions The findings suggest that the addition of ICIs to TACE and TKI therapy offers substantial efficacy benefits without increasing toxicity for HCC patients. This combination therapy shows potential to improve DCR, ORR, PFS and OS, underscoring the value of immunotherapy in enhancing outcomes in HCC. However, further randomized trials with standardized treatment protocols are needed to confirm these results and inform clinical guidelines.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
84
期刊介绍: With the first issue in 2014, the journal ''Onkologie'' has changed its title to ''Oncology Research and Treatment''. By this change, publisher and editor set the scene for the further development of this interdisciplinary journal. The English title makes it clear that the articles are published in English – a logical step for the journal, which is listed in all relevant international databases. For excellent manuscripts, a ''Fast Track'' was introduced: The review is carried out within 2 weeks; after acceptance the papers are published online within 14 days and immediately released as ''Editor’s Choice'' to provide the authors with maximum visibility of their results. Interesting case reports are published in the section ''Novel Insights from Clinical Practice'' which clearly highlights the scientific advances which the report presents.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信