不同间歇性禁食模式或不同程度热量限制对成人减肥和代谢改善的比较:随机对照试验的系统综述和网络荟萃分析

IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Xianglin Wu, Yi Ding, Qiuyu Cao, Jiaojiao Huang, Xiaoli Xu, Youjin Jiang, Yu Xu, Jieli Lu, Min Xu, Tiange Wang, Zhiyun Zhao, Weiqing Wang, Guang Ning, Yufang Bi, Mian Li
{"title":"不同间歇性禁食模式或不同程度热量限制对成人减肥和代谢改善的比较:随机对照试验的系统综述和网络荟萃分析","authors":"Xianglin Wu, Yi Ding, Qiuyu Cao, Jiaojiao Huang, Xiaoli Xu, Youjin Jiang, Yu Xu, Jieli Lu, Min Xu, Tiange Wang, Zhiyun Zhao, Weiqing Wang, Guang Ning, Yufang Bi, Mian Li","doi":"10.1093/nutrit/nuaf056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Continuous energy restriction (CER) and intermittent fasting (IF) are both prevalent diet regimens recommended for weight loss and metabolic improvement.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of CER and IF on weight loss and metabolic improvement in adults with overweight, obesity, or metabolic abnormalities.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library (CENTRAL) were searched for randomized controlled trials of 3 degrees of CER diet regimens and 4 categories of IF diet regimens, from inception of the databases to December 2022.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>Two reviewers independently extracted demographic information, the intervention duration, details of the dietary interventions, and data on the outcomes of interest.</p><p><strong>Data analysis: </strong>Bayesian random-effect network meta-analyses were used to pool the results and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation framework was used to assess the certainty of the evidence and to present the findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 167 eligible trials with a total enrollment of 11 998 participants. Most IF diet regimens induced significant weight loss that was comparable with that induced by CER diet regimens with a similar absolute energy restriction, based on low- to high-certainty evidence. Severe CER proved to be the most effective regimen for obtaining weight loss, based on moderate-certainty evidence (mean difference of weight change 11.50 kg [95% CI 10.07 to 12.93]), followed by alternate-day fasting, based on high-certainty evidence (mean difference of weight change (5.07 kg [95% CI 3.44 to 6.72]) and moderate CER, based on moderate-certainty evidence (6.09 kg [95% CI 5.26 to 6.93]), when the regimens being compared were consistent in their absolute energy restriction extent. Similar results were noticed for body measurements, blood pressure, blood lipids, and glycemic profiles. In the subgroup analysis, the weight-loss effects of the IF but not the CER diet regimens experienced rebound after 12 weeks.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In adults with overweight, obesity, or metabolic abnormalities, effectiveness in weight loss mainly depends on the extent of the energy restriction, regardless of the mealtime patterns.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>PROSPERO registration no. CRD42022379621.</p>","PeriodicalId":19469,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition reviews","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Different Intermittent Fasting Patterns or Different Extents of Calorie Restriction for Weight Loss and Metabolic Improvement in Adults: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.\",\"authors\":\"Xianglin Wu, Yi Ding, Qiuyu Cao, Jiaojiao Huang, Xiaoli Xu, Youjin Jiang, Yu Xu, Jieli Lu, Min Xu, Tiange Wang, Zhiyun Zhao, Weiqing Wang, Guang Ning, Yufang Bi, Mian Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/nutrit/nuaf056\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Continuous energy restriction (CER) and intermittent fasting (IF) are both prevalent diet regimens recommended for weight loss and metabolic improvement.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of CER and IF on weight loss and metabolic improvement in adults with overweight, obesity, or metabolic abnormalities.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library (CENTRAL) were searched for randomized controlled trials of 3 degrees of CER diet regimens and 4 categories of IF diet regimens, from inception of the databases to December 2022.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>Two reviewers independently extracted demographic information, the intervention duration, details of the dietary interventions, and data on the outcomes of interest.</p><p><strong>Data analysis: </strong>Bayesian random-effect network meta-analyses were used to pool the results and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation framework was used to assess the certainty of the evidence and to present the findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 167 eligible trials with a total enrollment of 11 998 participants. Most IF diet regimens induced significant weight loss that was comparable with that induced by CER diet regimens with a similar absolute energy restriction, based on low- to high-certainty evidence. Severe CER proved to be the most effective regimen for obtaining weight loss, based on moderate-certainty evidence (mean difference of weight change 11.50 kg [95% CI 10.07 to 12.93]), followed by alternate-day fasting, based on high-certainty evidence (mean difference of weight change (5.07 kg [95% CI 3.44 to 6.72]) and moderate CER, based on moderate-certainty evidence (6.09 kg [95% CI 5.26 to 6.93]), when the regimens being compared were consistent in their absolute energy restriction extent. Similar results were noticed for body measurements, blood pressure, blood lipids, and glycemic profiles. In the subgroup analysis, the weight-loss effects of the IF but not the CER diet regimens experienced rebound after 12 weeks.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In adults with overweight, obesity, or metabolic abnormalities, effectiveness in weight loss mainly depends on the extent of the energy restriction, regardless of the mealtime patterns.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>PROSPERO registration no. CRD42022379621.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19469,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nutrition reviews\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nutrition reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/nutrit/nuaf056\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/nutrit/nuaf056","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:持续能量限制(CER)和间歇性禁食(IF)都是推荐用于减肥和改善代谢的流行饮食方案。目的:本研究的目的是评估CER和IF对超重、肥胖或代谢异常的成人体重减轻和代谢改善的疗效。数据来源:PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆(CENTRAL)检索了从数据库建立到2022年12月的3度CER饮食方案和4类IF饮食方案的随机对照试验。数据提取:两位评论者独立提取了人口统计信息、干预持续时间、饮食干预的细节和相关结果的数据。数据分析:贝叶斯随机效应网络荟萃分析用于汇总结果,推荐、评估、发展和评估分级框架用于评估证据的确定性并呈现研究结果。结果:本研究纳入167项符合条件的试验,共纳入11,998名受试者。基于低到高确定性的证据,大多数IF饮食方案引起的显著体重减轻与具有类似绝对能量限制的CER饮食方案引起的体重减轻相当。严重的CER被证明是最有效的方案获得减肥,基于moderate-certainty证据(体重变化的平均差11.50公斤(95%可信区间10.07到12.93)),其次是偶尔禁食,基于高确定性的证据(平均差的重量变化(5.07公斤[95%可信区间3.44到6.72])和温和的CER,基于moderate-certainty证据(6.09公斤[95%可信区间5.26到6.93]),当方案相比绝对能量限制程度是一致的。在身体测量、血压、血脂和血糖谱上也发现了类似的结果。在亚组分析中,IF而不是CER饮食方案的减肥效果在12周后出现反弹。结论:对于超重、肥胖或代谢异常的成年人,减肥的有效性主要取决于能量限制的程度,而与进餐时间模式无关。系统评审注册:普洛斯彼罗注册号。CRD42022379621。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Different Intermittent Fasting Patterns or Different Extents of Calorie Restriction for Weight Loss and Metabolic Improvement in Adults: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Context: Continuous energy restriction (CER) and intermittent fasting (IF) are both prevalent diet regimens recommended for weight loss and metabolic improvement.

Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of CER and IF on weight loss and metabolic improvement in adults with overweight, obesity, or metabolic abnormalities.

Data sources: PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library (CENTRAL) were searched for randomized controlled trials of 3 degrees of CER diet regimens and 4 categories of IF diet regimens, from inception of the databases to December 2022.

Data extraction: Two reviewers independently extracted demographic information, the intervention duration, details of the dietary interventions, and data on the outcomes of interest.

Data analysis: Bayesian random-effect network meta-analyses were used to pool the results and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation framework was used to assess the certainty of the evidence and to present the findings.

Results: The study included 167 eligible trials with a total enrollment of 11 998 participants. Most IF diet regimens induced significant weight loss that was comparable with that induced by CER diet regimens with a similar absolute energy restriction, based on low- to high-certainty evidence. Severe CER proved to be the most effective regimen for obtaining weight loss, based on moderate-certainty evidence (mean difference of weight change 11.50 kg [95% CI 10.07 to 12.93]), followed by alternate-day fasting, based on high-certainty evidence (mean difference of weight change (5.07 kg [95% CI 3.44 to 6.72]) and moderate CER, based on moderate-certainty evidence (6.09 kg [95% CI 5.26 to 6.93]), when the regimens being compared were consistent in their absolute energy restriction extent. Similar results were noticed for body measurements, blood pressure, blood lipids, and glycemic profiles. In the subgroup analysis, the weight-loss effects of the IF but not the CER diet regimens experienced rebound after 12 weeks.

Conclusion: In adults with overweight, obesity, or metabolic abnormalities, effectiveness in weight loss mainly depends on the extent of the energy restriction, regardless of the mealtime patterns.

Systematic review registration: PROSPERO registration no. CRD42022379621.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nutrition reviews
Nutrition reviews 医学-营养学
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
1.60%
发文量
121
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nutrition Reviews is a highly cited, monthly, international, peer-reviewed journal that specializes in the publication of authoritative and critical literature reviews on current and emerging topics in nutrition science, food science, clinical nutrition, and nutrition policy. Readers of Nutrition Reviews include nutrition scientists, biomedical researchers, clinical and dietetic practitioners, and advanced students of nutrition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信