Tong Mu, Kejiang Chen, Yi Xu, Yonggang Hao, Dan Liu, Ke Wei
{"title":"T9水平竖脊肌平面阻滞与腹横平面阻滞对肥胖腹腔镜袖胃切除术患者术后镇痛和恢复的比较:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Tong Mu, Kejiang Chen, Yi Xu, Yonggang Hao, Dan Liu, Ke Wei","doi":"10.1007/s11695-025-07920-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Effective postoperative analgesia is essential for recovery after bariatric surgery. This study examines whether T9 erector spinae plane (ESP) block provides better analgesia and recovery than subcostal transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in patients with obesity undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients undergoing LSG were randomized to receive either ESP or TAP blocks. The primary outcome was pain intensity measured by the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). Secondary outcomes included sensory blockade levels, opioid consumption (morphine equivalents), need for rescue analgesia, and recovery milestones.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 168 patients, median age was 29.0 years (ESP) vs 31.0 years (TAP) (p = 0.135), with most being female (67.9% ESP, 65.5% TAP) (p = 0.743). Median BMI was 36.7 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (ESP) vs 37.1 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (TAP) (p = 0.819). Patients receiving ESP blocks consistently reported lower NRS scores postoperatively (p = 0.002 and p < 0.001). Sensory blockade in the ESP group was more consistent (84.5% at T6-T12), whereas the TAP group exhibited greater variability (p < 0.001). Opioid consumption within 48 h was lower in the ESP group (median reduction of 8 mg) (p < 0.001). Moreover, ESP group patients needed less rescue analgesia (p = 0.001) and demonstrated faster functional recovery (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For patients with obesity undergoing LSG, ultrasound-guided ESP block at T9 enhances postoperative analgesia and accelerates recovery compared to subcostal TAP block. While the difference in NRS scores was modest, ESP's ability to reduce opioid use and promote faster recovery highlights its clinical advantage.</p>","PeriodicalId":19460,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"2249-2263"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison Between Erector Spinae Plane Block at T9 Level and Transversus Abdominis Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia and Recovery in Patients with Obesity Undergoing Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Tong Mu, Kejiang Chen, Yi Xu, Yonggang Hao, Dan Liu, Ke Wei\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11695-025-07920-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Effective postoperative analgesia is essential for recovery after bariatric surgery. This study examines whether T9 erector spinae plane (ESP) block provides better analgesia and recovery than subcostal transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in patients with obesity undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients undergoing LSG were randomized to receive either ESP or TAP blocks. The primary outcome was pain intensity measured by the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). Secondary outcomes included sensory blockade levels, opioid consumption (morphine equivalents), need for rescue analgesia, and recovery milestones.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 168 patients, median age was 29.0 years (ESP) vs 31.0 years (TAP) (p = 0.135), with most being female (67.9% ESP, 65.5% TAP) (p = 0.743). Median BMI was 36.7 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (ESP) vs 37.1 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (TAP) (p = 0.819). Patients receiving ESP blocks consistently reported lower NRS scores postoperatively (p = 0.002 and p < 0.001). Sensory blockade in the ESP group was more consistent (84.5% at T6-T12), whereas the TAP group exhibited greater variability (p < 0.001). Opioid consumption within 48 h was lower in the ESP group (median reduction of 8 mg) (p < 0.001). Moreover, ESP group patients needed less rescue analgesia (p = 0.001) and demonstrated faster functional recovery (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For patients with obesity undergoing LSG, ultrasound-guided ESP block at T9 enhances postoperative analgesia and accelerates recovery compared to subcostal TAP block. While the difference in NRS scores was modest, ESP's ability to reduce opioid use and promote faster recovery highlights its clinical advantage.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19460,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obesity Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2249-2263\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obesity Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-025-07920-7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-025-07920-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
有效的术后镇痛对减肥手术后的恢复至关重要。本研究探讨T9竖脊肌平面(ESP)阻滞是否比肋下腹横平面(TAP)阻滞对实施腹腔镜袖胃切除术(LSG)的肥胖患者有更好的镇痛和恢复效果。方法:接受LSG的患者随机接受ESP或TAP阻滞。主要结局是用数字评定量表(NRS)测量疼痛强度。次要结局包括感觉阻滞水平、阿片类药物消耗(吗啡当量)、需要抢救镇痛和恢复里程碑。结果:168例患者中位年龄为29.0岁(ESP) vs 31.0岁(TAP) (p = 0.135),以女性居多(ESP 67.9%, TAP 65.5%) (p = 0.743)。中位BMI为36.7 kg/m2 (ESP) vs 37.1 kg/m2 (TAP) (p = 0.819)。结论:对于接受LSG的肥胖患者,超声引导下的T9期ESP阻滞与肋下TAP阻滞相比,可增强术后镇痛并加速恢复。虽然NRS评分的差异不大,但ESP减少阿片类药物使用和促进更快恢复的能力突出了其临床优势。
Comparison Between Erector Spinae Plane Block at T9 Level and Transversus Abdominis Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia and Recovery in Patients with Obesity Undergoing Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Introduction: Effective postoperative analgesia is essential for recovery after bariatric surgery. This study examines whether T9 erector spinae plane (ESP) block provides better analgesia and recovery than subcostal transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in patients with obesity undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG).
Methods: Patients undergoing LSG were randomized to receive either ESP or TAP blocks. The primary outcome was pain intensity measured by the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). Secondary outcomes included sensory blockade levels, opioid consumption (morphine equivalents), need for rescue analgesia, and recovery milestones.
Results: Among 168 patients, median age was 29.0 years (ESP) vs 31.0 years (TAP) (p = 0.135), with most being female (67.9% ESP, 65.5% TAP) (p = 0.743). Median BMI was 36.7 kg/m2 (ESP) vs 37.1 kg/m2 (TAP) (p = 0.819). Patients receiving ESP blocks consistently reported lower NRS scores postoperatively (p = 0.002 and p < 0.001). Sensory blockade in the ESP group was more consistent (84.5% at T6-T12), whereas the TAP group exhibited greater variability (p < 0.001). Opioid consumption within 48 h was lower in the ESP group (median reduction of 8 mg) (p < 0.001). Moreover, ESP group patients needed less rescue analgesia (p = 0.001) and demonstrated faster functional recovery (p < 0.001).
Conclusions: For patients with obesity undergoing LSG, ultrasound-guided ESP block at T9 enhances postoperative analgesia and accelerates recovery compared to subcostal TAP block. While the difference in NRS scores was modest, ESP's ability to reduce opioid use and promote faster recovery highlights its clinical advantage.
期刊介绍:
Obesity Surgery is the official journal of the International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and metabolic disorders (IFSO). A journal for bariatric/metabolic surgeons, Obesity Surgery provides an international, interdisciplinary forum for communicating the latest research, surgical and laparoscopic techniques, for treatment of massive obesity and metabolic disorders. Topics covered include original research, clinical reports, current status, guidelines, historical notes, invited commentaries, letters to the editor, medicolegal issues, meeting abstracts, modern surgery/technical innovations, new concepts, reviews, scholarly presentations and opinions.
Obesity Surgery benefits surgeons performing obesity/metabolic surgery, general surgeons and surgical residents, endoscopists, anesthetists, support staff, nurses, dietitians, psychiatrists, psychologists, plastic surgeons, internists including endocrinologists and diabetologists, nutritional scientists, and those dealing with eating disorders.