戒烟和戒酒联合治疗无家可归者:一项随机试验。

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Olanrewaju Onigbogi, Rebekah Pratt, Xianghua Luo, Susan A Everson-Rose, Ned L Cooney, Sheila Specker, Janet Thomas, Kolawole Okuyemi
{"title":"戒烟和戒酒联合治疗无家可归者:一项随机试验。","authors":"Olanrewaju Onigbogi, Rebekah Pratt, Xianghua Luo, Susan A Everson-Rose, Ned L Cooney, Sheila Specker, Janet Thomas, Kolawole Okuyemi","doi":"10.1093/ntr/ntaf085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In the United States, 80% of adults experiencing homelessness smoke combustible cigarettes. Power to Quit 2 (PTQ2) was a randomized clinical trial to test the efficacy of a combined smoking cessation and alcohol abstinence biobehavioral intervention, Intensive Smoking plus Alcohol (IS+A), versus Usual Care (UC) for adults experiencing homelessness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PTQ2 was conducted in 2 urban homeless shelters in the Upper Midwest (2014-2018). People who smoked and reported hazardous alcohol use (N=344) were randomized to IS+A (10 sessions of cognitive behavioral therapy for smoking and alcohol cessation plus nicotine replacement therapy [NRT], n=168) or UC (educational session on smoking and alcohol cessation plus NRT, n=176). The primary hypothesis was that the intervention would result in greater biochemically verified 7-day point-prevalent smoking abstinence 26 weeks post-intervention compared with UC. Our secondary hypothesis was that the intervention would result in greater 30-day alcohol abstinence 26 weeks post-intervention compared with UC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At week 26, the IS+A intervention group did not differ from the UC group in expired carbon monoxide-verified 7-day point-prevalent smoking abstinence (16.6% vs. 12.8%, P=0.47) or rate of self-reported 30-day alcohol abstinence (91.1% vs. 90.2%, P=0.75).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The IS+A intervention did not result in significantly better smoking or alcohol cessation outcomes than UC. Nonetheless, trends in the smoking outcome data favored the intervention group, underscoring the importance of continued research into bio-behavioral interventions that address smoking and alcohol use among adults experiencing homelessness.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>The study highlights the difficulty in observing changes in smoking outcomes in interventions tailored to concurrently address smoking and alcohol use among persons experiencing homelessness. The findings add to existing knowledge by providing evidence about the real-world complexities facing people who use tobacco and alcohol while experiencing homelessness.</p>","PeriodicalId":19241,"journal":{"name":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Combined smoking cessation and alcohol abstinence treatment for people experiencing homelessness: a randomized trial.\",\"authors\":\"Olanrewaju Onigbogi, Rebekah Pratt, Xianghua Luo, Susan A Everson-Rose, Ned L Cooney, Sheila Specker, Janet Thomas, Kolawole Okuyemi\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ntr/ntaf085\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In the United States, 80% of adults experiencing homelessness smoke combustible cigarettes. Power to Quit 2 (PTQ2) was a randomized clinical trial to test the efficacy of a combined smoking cessation and alcohol abstinence biobehavioral intervention, Intensive Smoking plus Alcohol (IS+A), versus Usual Care (UC) for adults experiencing homelessness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PTQ2 was conducted in 2 urban homeless shelters in the Upper Midwest (2014-2018). People who smoked and reported hazardous alcohol use (N=344) were randomized to IS+A (10 sessions of cognitive behavioral therapy for smoking and alcohol cessation plus nicotine replacement therapy [NRT], n=168) or UC (educational session on smoking and alcohol cessation plus NRT, n=176). The primary hypothesis was that the intervention would result in greater biochemically verified 7-day point-prevalent smoking abstinence 26 weeks post-intervention compared with UC. Our secondary hypothesis was that the intervention would result in greater 30-day alcohol abstinence 26 weeks post-intervention compared with UC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At week 26, the IS+A intervention group did not differ from the UC group in expired carbon monoxide-verified 7-day point-prevalent smoking abstinence (16.6% vs. 12.8%, P=0.47) or rate of self-reported 30-day alcohol abstinence (91.1% vs. 90.2%, P=0.75).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The IS+A intervention did not result in significantly better smoking or alcohol cessation outcomes than UC. Nonetheless, trends in the smoking outcome data favored the intervention group, underscoring the importance of continued research into bio-behavioral interventions that address smoking and alcohol use among adults experiencing homelessness.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>The study highlights the difficulty in observing changes in smoking outcomes in interventions tailored to concurrently address smoking and alcohol use among persons experiencing homelessness. The findings add to existing knowledge by providing evidence about the real-world complexities facing people who use tobacco and alcohol while experiencing homelessness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nicotine & Tobacco Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nicotine & Tobacco Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntaf085\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntaf085","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:在美国,80%无家可归的成年人吸食可燃香烟。戒烟的力量2 (PTQ2)是一项随机临床试验,旨在测试戒烟和戒酒联合生物行为干预,密集吸烟加酒精(IS+ a)与常规护理(UC)对无家可归的成年人的疗效。方法:PTQ2于2014-2018年在中西部北部的2个城市无家可归者收容所进行。吸烟和报告有害酒精使用的人(N=344)被随机分为IS+A组(10次戒烟和酒精的认知行为疗法加尼古丁替代疗法[NRT], N= 168)或UC组(戒烟和酒精的教育课程加NRT, N= 176)。主要的假设是,与UC相比,干预会导致干预后26周更大的生化验证的7天点普遍戒烟。我们的第二个假设是,与UC相比,干预会导致干预后26周的30天酒精戒断。结果:在第26周,IS+A干预组与UC组在过期一氧化碳验证的7天点普遍戒烟率(16.6%对12.8%,P=0.47)或自我报告的30天酒精戒除率(91.1%对90.2%,P=0.75)方面没有差异。结论:IS+A干预并没有导致比UC更好的戒烟或戒酒结果。尽管如此,吸烟结果数据的趋势倾向于干预组,强调了继续研究生物行为干预措施的重要性,这些干预措施可以解决无家可归的成年人吸烟和饮酒的问题。含义:该研究强调了在同时解决无家可归者吸烟和饮酒问题的干预措施中观察吸烟结果变化的困难。这些发现增加了现有的知识,为无家可归的吸烟者和酗酒者面临的现实世界的复杂性提供了证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Combined smoking cessation and alcohol abstinence treatment for people experiencing homelessness: a randomized trial.

Introduction: In the United States, 80% of adults experiencing homelessness smoke combustible cigarettes. Power to Quit 2 (PTQ2) was a randomized clinical trial to test the efficacy of a combined smoking cessation and alcohol abstinence biobehavioral intervention, Intensive Smoking plus Alcohol (IS+A), versus Usual Care (UC) for adults experiencing homelessness.

Methods: PTQ2 was conducted in 2 urban homeless shelters in the Upper Midwest (2014-2018). People who smoked and reported hazardous alcohol use (N=344) were randomized to IS+A (10 sessions of cognitive behavioral therapy for smoking and alcohol cessation plus nicotine replacement therapy [NRT], n=168) or UC (educational session on smoking and alcohol cessation plus NRT, n=176). The primary hypothesis was that the intervention would result in greater biochemically verified 7-day point-prevalent smoking abstinence 26 weeks post-intervention compared with UC. Our secondary hypothesis was that the intervention would result in greater 30-day alcohol abstinence 26 weeks post-intervention compared with UC.

Results: At week 26, the IS+A intervention group did not differ from the UC group in expired carbon monoxide-verified 7-day point-prevalent smoking abstinence (16.6% vs. 12.8%, P=0.47) or rate of self-reported 30-day alcohol abstinence (91.1% vs. 90.2%, P=0.75).

Conclusions: The IS+A intervention did not result in significantly better smoking or alcohol cessation outcomes than UC. Nonetheless, trends in the smoking outcome data favored the intervention group, underscoring the importance of continued research into bio-behavioral interventions that address smoking and alcohol use among adults experiencing homelessness.

Implications: The study highlights the difficulty in observing changes in smoking outcomes in interventions tailored to concurrently address smoking and alcohol use among persons experiencing homelessness. The findings add to existing knowledge by providing evidence about the real-world complexities facing people who use tobacco and alcohol while experiencing homelessness.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
Nicotine & Tobacco Research 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
10.60%
发文量
268
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Nicotine & Tobacco Research is one of the world''s few peer-reviewed journals devoted exclusively to the study of nicotine and tobacco. It aims to provide a forum for empirical findings, critical reviews, and conceptual papers on the many aspects of nicotine and tobacco, including research from the biobehavioral, neurobiological, molecular biologic, epidemiological, prevention, and treatment arenas. Along with manuscripts from each of the areas mentioned above, the editors encourage submissions that are integrative in nature and that cross traditional disciplinary boundaries. The journal is sponsored by the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco (SRNT). It publishes twelve times a year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信