Olanrewaju Onigbogi, Rebekah Pratt, Xianghua Luo, Susan A Everson-Rose, Ned L Cooney, Sheila Specker, Janet Thomas, Kolawole Okuyemi
{"title":"戒烟和戒酒联合治疗无家可归者:一项随机试验。","authors":"Olanrewaju Onigbogi, Rebekah Pratt, Xianghua Luo, Susan A Everson-Rose, Ned L Cooney, Sheila Specker, Janet Thomas, Kolawole Okuyemi","doi":"10.1093/ntr/ntaf085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In the United States, 80% of adults experiencing homelessness smoke combustible cigarettes. Power to Quit 2 (PTQ2) was a randomized clinical trial to test the efficacy of a combined smoking cessation and alcohol abstinence biobehavioral intervention, Intensive Smoking plus Alcohol (IS+A), versus Usual Care (UC) for adults experiencing homelessness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PTQ2 was conducted in 2 urban homeless shelters in the Upper Midwest (2014-2018). People who smoked and reported hazardous alcohol use (N=344) were randomized to IS+A (10 sessions of cognitive behavioral therapy for smoking and alcohol cessation plus nicotine replacement therapy [NRT], n=168) or UC (educational session on smoking and alcohol cessation plus NRT, n=176). The primary hypothesis was that the intervention would result in greater biochemically verified 7-day point-prevalent smoking abstinence 26 weeks post-intervention compared with UC. Our secondary hypothesis was that the intervention would result in greater 30-day alcohol abstinence 26 weeks post-intervention compared with UC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At week 26, the IS+A intervention group did not differ from the UC group in expired carbon monoxide-verified 7-day point-prevalent smoking abstinence (16.6% vs. 12.8%, P=0.47) or rate of self-reported 30-day alcohol abstinence (91.1% vs. 90.2%, P=0.75).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The IS+A intervention did not result in significantly better smoking or alcohol cessation outcomes than UC. Nonetheless, trends in the smoking outcome data favored the intervention group, underscoring the importance of continued research into bio-behavioral interventions that address smoking and alcohol use among adults experiencing homelessness.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>The study highlights the difficulty in observing changes in smoking outcomes in interventions tailored to concurrently address smoking and alcohol use among persons experiencing homelessness. The findings add to existing knowledge by providing evidence about the real-world complexities facing people who use tobacco and alcohol while experiencing homelessness.</p>","PeriodicalId":19241,"journal":{"name":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Combined smoking cessation and alcohol abstinence treatment for people experiencing homelessness: a randomized trial.\",\"authors\":\"Olanrewaju Onigbogi, Rebekah Pratt, Xianghua Luo, Susan A Everson-Rose, Ned L Cooney, Sheila Specker, Janet Thomas, Kolawole Okuyemi\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ntr/ntaf085\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In the United States, 80% of adults experiencing homelessness smoke combustible cigarettes. Power to Quit 2 (PTQ2) was a randomized clinical trial to test the efficacy of a combined smoking cessation and alcohol abstinence biobehavioral intervention, Intensive Smoking plus Alcohol (IS+A), versus Usual Care (UC) for adults experiencing homelessness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PTQ2 was conducted in 2 urban homeless shelters in the Upper Midwest (2014-2018). People who smoked and reported hazardous alcohol use (N=344) were randomized to IS+A (10 sessions of cognitive behavioral therapy for smoking and alcohol cessation plus nicotine replacement therapy [NRT], n=168) or UC (educational session on smoking and alcohol cessation plus NRT, n=176). The primary hypothesis was that the intervention would result in greater biochemically verified 7-day point-prevalent smoking abstinence 26 weeks post-intervention compared with UC. Our secondary hypothesis was that the intervention would result in greater 30-day alcohol abstinence 26 weeks post-intervention compared with UC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At week 26, the IS+A intervention group did not differ from the UC group in expired carbon monoxide-verified 7-day point-prevalent smoking abstinence (16.6% vs. 12.8%, P=0.47) or rate of self-reported 30-day alcohol abstinence (91.1% vs. 90.2%, P=0.75).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The IS+A intervention did not result in significantly better smoking or alcohol cessation outcomes than UC. Nonetheless, trends in the smoking outcome data favored the intervention group, underscoring the importance of continued research into bio-behavioral interventions that address smoking and alcohol use among adults experiencing homelessness.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>The study highlights the difficulty in observing changes in smoking outcomes in interventions tailored to concurrently address smoking and alcohol use among persons experiencing homelessness. The findings add to existing knowledge by providing evidence about the real-world complexities facing people who use tobacco and alcohol while experiencing homelessness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nicotine & Tobacco Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nicotine & Tobacco Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntaf085\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntaf085","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Combined smoking cessation and alcohol abstinence treatment for people experiencing homelessness: a randomized trial.
Introduction: In the United States, 80% of adults experiencing homelessness smoke combustible cigarettes. Power to Quit 2 (PTQ2) was a randomized clinical trial to test the efficacy of a combined smoking cessation and alcohol abstinence biobehavioral intervention, Intensive Smoking plus Alcohol (IS+A), versus Usual Care (UC) for adults experiencing homelessness.
Methods: PTQ2 was conducted in 2 urban homeless shelters in the Upper Midwest (2014-2018). People who smoked and reported hazardous alcohol use (N=344) were randomized to IS+A (10 sessions of cognitive behavioral therapy for smoking and alcohol cessation plus nicotine replacement therapy [NRT], n=168) or UC (educational session on smoking and alcohol cessation plus NRT, n=176). The primary hypothesis was that the intervention would result in greater biochemically verified 7-day point-prevalent smoking abstinence 26 weeks post-intervention compared with UC. Our secondary hypothesis was that the intervention would result in greater 30-day alcohol abstinence 26 weeks post-intervention compared with UC.
Results: At week 26, the IS+A intervention group did not differ from the UC group in expired carbon monoxide-verified 7-day point-prevalent smoking abstinence (16.6% vs. 12.8%, P=0.47) or rate of self-reported 30-day alcohol abstinence (91.1% vs. 90.2%, P=0.75).
Conclusions: The IS+A intervention did not result in significantly better smoking or alcohol cessation outcomes than UC. Nonetheless, trends in the smoking outcome data favored the intervention group, underscoring the importance of continued research into bio-behavioral interventions that address smoking and alcohol use among adults experiencing homelessness.
Implications: The study highlights the difficulty in observing changes in smoking outcomes in interventions tailored to concurrently address smoking and alcohol use among persons experiencing homelessness. The findings add to existing knowledge by providing evidence about the real-world complexities facing people who use tobacco and alcohol while experiencing homelessness.
期刊介绍:
Nicotine & Tobacco Research is one of the world''s few peer-reviewed journals devoted exclusively to the study of nicotine and tobacco.
It aims to provide a forum for empirical findings, critical reviews, and conceptual papers on the many aspects of nicotine and tobacco, including research from the biobehavioral, neurobiological, molecular biologic, epidemiological, prevention, and treatment arenas.
Along with manuscripts from each of the areas mentioned above, the editors encourage submissions that are integrative in nature and that cross traditional disciplinary boundaries.
The journal is sponsored by the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco (SRNT). It publishes twelve times a year.