不同垂直尺寸口腔矫治器治疗患者阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征指标的初步研究

IF 1.6 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Minerva dental and oral science Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-15 DOI:10.23736/S2724-6329.25.05097-1
Luca Levrini, Jovana Kozokic, Nicola Giannotta, Elena F Bernardini, Alessandro Deppieri, Maria Sparaco, Rodolfo F Mastrapasqua, Stefano Saran
{"title":"不同垂直尺寸口腔矫治器治疗患者阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征指标的初步研究","authors":"Luca Levrini, Jovana Kozokic, Nicola Giannotta, Elena F Bernardini, Alessandro Deppieri, Maria Sparaco, Rodolfo F Mastrapasqua, Stefano Saran","doi":"10.23736/S2724-6329.25.05097-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mandibular reposition devices (MRDs) are a viable option for addressing snoring and mild to moderate obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) as another possibility to continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) ventilation during sleep. The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of OSAS MRDs with variation in vertical dimension, considering the OSAS indexes: Apnea Hypopnea Index (AHI), Oxygen Desaturation Index (ODI) and Snoring Index.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eleven patients with different level of OSAS were enrolled in this study. The patients in the study were evaluated at three different times (T0, T1, T2). At T0 the patients underwent a basal polysomnography (PSG) without any oral appliance. At T1, the PSG was executed using MRD at 70% of protrusion and a vertical dimension consequent of protrusion. The vertical dimension determined by a protruded position is the one that is caused by the repositioning of the mandible. At the T2, the patients used the same appliance with 70% of protrusion, adding a uniform 6-mm bite resin plane between the existing upper and lower splints of the MRD, in the lateral area. The patients enrolled in this study did not tolerate the CPAP. T-test for paired samples was used to assess the possible statistical differences between AHI and ODI (T0, T1 and T2). The snoring indexes were analyzed through Friedman test for corelated sample.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean value of AHI (T0) was 30.17±19.51. The mean AHI of T1 was 10.60±9.35, while the mean value of T2 was 5.41±3.25. The mean value of ODI (T0) was 29.02; SD±20.74. The mean ODI of T1 was 10.46±9.48, while the mean value of T2 was 5.40±3.41. Analyzing AHI and ODI, there was a significant statistical difference between T0 and T1 (P<0.05), between T1 and T2 (P<0.05) and between T0 and T2 (P<0.05). There was not any statistical difference for snoring indexes between T0, T1 and T2. (P>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>According to the results of this study, the major improvement of AHI and ODI is reached through the usage of MRD with an increase of vertical dimension. Considering all the limits of the study, it is possible to affirm that research should still take account of the vertical dimension as a possible factor when treating OSAS with oral appliance.</p>","PeriodicalId":18709,"journal":{"name":"Minerva dental and oral science","volume":" ","pages":"223-231"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome indexes in patients treated with oral appliances with different vertical dimension: a preliminary study.\",\"authors\":\"Luca Levrini, Jovana Kozokic, Nicola Giannotta, Elena F Bernardini, Alessandro Deppieri, Maria Sparaco, Rodolfo F Mastrapasqua, Stefano Saran\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S2724-6329.25.05097-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mandibular reposition devices (MRDs) are a viable option for addressing snoring and mild to moderate obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) as another possibility to continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) ventilation during sleep. The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of OSAS MRDs with variation in vertical dimension, considering the OSAS indexes: Apnea Hypopnea Index (AHI), Oxygen Desaturation Index (ODI) and Snoring Index.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eleven patients with different level of OSAS were enrolled in this study. The patients in the study were evaluated at three different times (T0, T1, T2). At T0 the patients underwent a basal polysomnography (PSG) without any oral appliance. At T1, the PSG was executed using MRD at 70% of protrusion and a vertical dimension consequent of protrusion. The vertical dimension determined by a protruded position is the one that is caused by the repositioning of the mandible. At the T2, the patients used the same appliance with 70% of protrusion, adding a uniform 6-mm bite resin plane between the existing upper and lower splints of the MRD, in the lateral area. The patients enrolled in this study did not tolerate the CPAP. T-test for paired samples was used to assess the possible statistical differences between AHI and ODI (T0, T1 and T2). The snoring indexes were analyzed through Friedman test for corelated sample.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean value of AHI (T0) was 30.17±19.51. The mean AHI of T1 was 10.60±9.35, while the mean value of T2 was 5.41±3.25. The mean value of ODI (T0) was 29.02; SD±20.74. The mean ODI of T1 was 10.46±9.48, while the mean value of T2 was 5.40±3.41. Analyzing AHI and ODI, there was a significant statistical difference between T0 and T1 (P<0.05), between T1 and T2 (P<0.05) and between T0 and T2 (P<0.05). There was not any statistical difference for snoring indexes between T0, T1 and T2. (P>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>According to the results of this study, the major improvement of AHI and ODI is reached through the usage of MRD with an increase of vertical dimension. Considering all the limits of the study, it is possible to affirm that research should still take account of the vertical dimension as a possible factor when treating OSAS with oral appliance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18709,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Minerva dental and oral science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"223-231\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Minerva dental and oral science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6329.25.05097-1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva dental and oral science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6329.25.05097-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:下颌骨复位装置(MRDs)是解决打鼾和轻度至中度阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征(OSAS)的可行选择,是睡眠期间持续气道正压通气(CPAP)的另一种可能性。考虑OSAS指标:呼吸暂停低通气指数(AHI)、氧去饱和指数(ODI)和打鼾指数,本研究的目的是评价垂直维度变化的OSAS mrd的疗效。方法:选取11例不同程度OSAS患者作为研究对象。在三个不同的时间(T0, T1, T2)对研究中的患者进行评估。在0岁时,患者在没有任何口腔器械的情况下进行了基础多导睡眠图(PSG)。在T1时,在突出70%和突出后的垂直尺寸处使用MRD进行PSG。由突出位置决定的垂直尺寸是由下颌骨重新定位引起的。在T2时,患者使用相同的器械,70%的突出,在MRD的现有上下夹板之间,在外侧区域添加一个均匀的6毫米咬合树脂平面。参加这项研究的患者不耐受CPAP。配对样本采用T检验评估AHI与ODI (T0、T1、T2)之间可能存在的统计学差异。相关样本采用Friedman检验对打鼾指标进行分析。结果:AHI (T0)平均值为30.17±19.51。T1的平均AHI为10.60±9.35,T2的平均AHI为5.41±3.25。ODI (T0)均值为29.02;SD±20.74。T1的ODI平均值为10.46±9.48,T2的ODI平均值为5.40±3.41。分析AHI和ODI, T0与T1比较,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:根据本研究的结果,AHI和ODI的主要改善是通过MRD的使用,并增加垂直维度。考虑到本研究的所有局限性,可以肯定的是,在使用口腔矫治器治疗OSAS时,研究仍应考虑垂直尺寸作为一个可能的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome indexes in patients treated with oral appliances with different vertical dimension: a preliminary study.

Background: Mandibular reposition devices (MRDs) are a viable option for addressing snoring and mild to moderate obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) as another possibility to continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) ventilation during sleep. The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of OSAS MRDs with variation in vertical dimension, considering the OSAS indexes: Apnea Hypopnea Index (AHI), Oxygen Desaturation Index (ODI) and Snoring Index.

Methods: Eleven patients with different level of OSAS were enrolled in this study. The patients in the study were evaluated at three different times (T0, T1, T2). At T0 the patients underwent a basal polysomnography (PSG) without any oral appliance. At T1, the PSG was executed using MRD at 70% of protrusion and a vertical dimension consequent of protrusion. The vertical dimension determined by a protruded position is the one that is caused by the repositioning of the mandible. At the T2, the patients used the same appliance with 70% of protrusion, adding a uniform 6-mm bite resin plane between the existing upper and lower splints of the MRD, in the lateral area. The patients enrolled in this study did not tolerate the CPAP. T-test for paired samples was used to assess the possible statistical differences between AHI and ODI (T0, T1 and T2). The snoring indexes were analyzed through Friedman test for corelated sample.

Results: The mean value of AHI (T0) was 30.17±19.51. The mean AHI of T1 was 10.60±9.35, while the mean value of T2 was 5.41±3.25. The mean value of ODI (T0) was 29.02; SD±20.74. The mean ODI of T1 was 10.46±9.48, while the mean value of T2 was 5.40±3.41. Analyzing AHI and ODI, there was a significant statistical difference between T0 and T1 (P<0.05), between T1 and T2 (P<0.05) and between T0 and T2 (P<0.05). There was not any statistical difference for snoring indexes between T0, T1 and T2. (P>0.05).

Conclusions: According to the results of this study, the major improvement of AHI and ODI is reached through the usage of MRD with an increase of vertical dimension. Considering all the limits of the study, it is possible to affirm that research should still take account of the vertical dimension as a possible factor when treating OSAS with oral appliance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Minerva dental and oral science
Minerva dental and oral science DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
61
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信