{"title":"月经管理和原发性痛经强度对生活质量的影响:智利妇女的横断面研究。","authors":"Julieta Aránguiz-Ramírez, Rossana Recabarren-Espinoza, Juana Mora-Lara","doi":"10.5867/medwave.2025.04.3013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Primary dysmenorrhea is defined as pain during the menstrual cycle, recurrent cramping type in the absence of an identifiable cause. It can negatively affect the quality of life of those who suffer from it. The objective is to determine the association between pain intensity in primary dysmenorrhea and the impact on quality of life related to menstrual health, presenteeism, and sexual function in adult Chilean women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional observational study. A sample of 392 women with painful menstruation in the last six months. A self-reported survey was distributed on social media between January and June 2024, consisting of sociodemographic questions, pain intensity and perception, the EQ5D-3L quality of life questionnaire, the Stanford Presenteeism Scale, and the Women's Sexual Function Questionnaire adapted to the study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age was 29.2 +/- 8.2 years, and the mean pain intensity was 6.7 +/- 2.04 points. High pain intensity was associated with greater impairment. Those with severe or extreme pain experienced a significant impact on their quality of life related to menstrual health. Among the compromised aspects, the most notable were the performance of usual activities (OR 9.99), lower work performance (lack of concentration), and decreased social activities. The most common mitigation measures used were local heat (96.7%), herbal teas (63.5%), and medication (90%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Dysmenorrhea impacts different dimensions of quality of life. Despite its high prevalence, it is often underestimated, and women often normalize pain by employing various methods to mitigate it. The concept of menstrual health is a subjective and multidimensional experience. The results suggest the importance of comprehensively updating the management of dysmenorrhea and incorporating new studies on economic evaluation, prevalence, and self-image to delve deeper into the subject.</p>","PeriodicalId":18597,"journal":{"name":"Medwave","volume":"25 4","pages":"e3013"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Menstrual management and the impact of primary dysmenorrhea intensity on quality of life: A cross-sectional study in Chilean women.\",\"authors\":\"Julieta Aránguiz-Ramírez, Rossana Recabarren-Espinoza, Juana Mora-Lara\",\"doi\":\"10.5867/medwave.2025.04.3013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Primary dysmenorrhea is defined as pain during the menstrual cycle, recurrent cramping type in the absence of an identifiable cause. It can negatively affect the quality of life of those who suffer from it. The objective is to determine the association between pain intensity in primary dysmenorrhea and the impact on quality of life related to menstrual health, presenteeism, and sexual function in adult Chilean women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional observational study. A sample of 392 women with painful menstruation in the last six months. A self-reported survey was distributed on social media between January and June 2024, consisting of sociodemographic questions, pain intensity and perception, the EQ5D-3L quality of life questionnaire, the Stanford Presenteeism Scale, and the Women's Sexual Function Questionnaire adapted to the study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age was 29.2 +/- 8.2 years, and the mean pain intensity was 6.7 +/- 2.04 points. High pain intensity was associated with greater impairment. Those with severe or extreme pain experienced a significant impact on their quality of life related to menstrual health. Among the compromised aspects, the most notable were the performance of usual activities (OR 9.99), lower work performance (lack of concentration), and decreased social activities. The most common mitigation measures used were local heat (96.7%), herbal teas (63.5%), and medication (90%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Dysmenorrhea impacts different dimensions of quality of life. Despite its high prevalence, it is often underestimated, and women often normalize pain by employing various methods to mitigate it. The concept of menstrual health is a subjective and multidimensional experience. The results suggest the importance of comprehensively updating the management of dysmenorrhea and incorporating new studies on economic evaluation, prevalence, and self-image to delve deeper into the subject.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18597,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medwave\",\"volume\":\"25 4\",\"pages\":\"e3013\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medwave\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5867/medwave.2025.04.3013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medwave","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5867/medwave.2025.04.3013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Menstrual management and the impact of primary dysmenorrhea intensity on quality of life: A cross-sectional study in Chilean women.
Introduction: Primary dysmenorrhea is defined as pain during the menstrual cycle, recurrent cramping type in the absence of an identifiable cause. It can negatively affect the quality of life of those who suffer from it. The objective is to determine the association between pain intensity in primary dysmenorrhea and the impact on quality of life related to menstrual health, presenteeism, and sexual function in adult Chilean women.
Methods: Cross-sectional observational study. A sample of 392 women with painful menstruation in the last six months. A self-reported survey was distributed on social media between January and June 2024, consisting of sociodemographic questions, pain intensity and perception, the EQ5D-3L quality of life questionnaire, the Stanford Presenteeism Scale, and the Women's Sexual Function Questionnaire adapted to the study.
Results: The mean age was 29.2 +/- 8.2 years, and the mean pain intensity was 6.7 +/- 2.04 points. High pain intensity was associated with greater impairment. Those with severe or extreme pain experienced a significant impact on their quality of life related to menstrual health. Among the compromised aspects, the most notable were the performance of usual activities (OR 9.99), lower work performance (lack of concentration), and decreased social activities. The most common mitigation measures used were local heat (96.7%), herbal teas (63.5%), and medication (90%).
Conclusions: Dysmenorrhea impacts different dimensions of quality of life. Despite its high prevalence, it is often underestimated, and women often normalize pain by employing various methods to mitigate it. The concept of menstrual health is a subjective and multidimensional experience. The results suggest the importance of comprehensively updating the management of dysmenorrhea and incorporating new studies on economic evaluation, prevalence, and self-image to delve deeper into the subject.
期刊介绍:
Medwave is a peer-reviewed, biomedical and public health journal. Since its foundation in 2001 (Volume 1) it has always been an online only, open access publication that does not charge subscription or reader fees. Since January 2011 (Volume 11, Number 1), all articles are peer-reviewed. Without losing sight of the importance of evidence-based approach and methodological soundness, the journal accepts for publication articles that focus on providing updates for clinical practice, review and analysis articles on topics such as ethics, public health and health policy; clinical, social and economic health determinants; clinical and health research findings from all of the major disciplines of medicine, medical science and public health. The journal does not publish basic science manuscripts or experiments conducted on animals. Until March 2013, Medwave was publishing 11-12 numbers a year. Each issue would be posted on the homepage on day 1 of each month, except for Chile’s summer holiday when the issue would cover two months. Starting from April 2013, Medwave adopted the continuous mode of publication, which means that the copyedited accepted articles are posted on the journal’s homepage as they are ready. They are then collated in the respective issue and included in the Past Issues section.