{"title":"日本系统性红斑狼疮患者抗脂蛋白脂肪酶抗体的临床意义。","authors":"Taro Horino, Takeshi Kashio, Satoshi Inotani, Yoshio Terada","doi":"10.1177/09612033251344051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectivesAs there is a lack of reports on the association between anti-lipoprotein lipase (anti-LPL) antibodies and dyslipoproteinemia, we aimed to analyse the association between anti-LPL antibodies and the clinical and serological characteristics of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and cardiovascular (CV) events.MethodsEighty patients with SLE were examined for the presence of anti-LPL antibodies via western blotting. Data on laboratory findings and the occurrence of CV events were retrospectively collected and evaluated. Patients with SLE were classified into two groups according to the detection of anti-LPL antibodies: anti-LPL antibody-positive and antibody-negative.ResultsAnti-LPL antibody immunoglobulin G was detected in 28 patients with SLE (35.0%). Additionally, triglyceride levels tended to be higher in the anti-LPL antibody-positive group than in the anti-LPL antibody-negative group. The former exhibited significantly higher levels of serum albumin, anti-Smith antibody, and IgM than the latter. The incidence of CV events was higher in the anti-LPL antibody-positive group than in the anti-LPL antibody-negative group (35.7% vs 5.8%, <i>p</i> = .001). Additionally, the risk of CV events was significantly higher in the anti-LPL antibody-positive group, with a hazard ratio of 169.20 (95% confidence interval: 5.75-4981.54, <i>p</i> = .003).ConclusionIn this study, the positivity rate of anti-LPL antibodies was high among Japanese patients with SLE. Additionally, a significantly higher incidence of CV events was observed in the anti-LPL antibody-positive group compared to that in the anti-LPL antibody-negative group.</p>","PeriodicalId":18044,"journal":{"name":"Lupus","volume":" ","pages":"699-704"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical significance of anti-lipoprotein lipase antibodies in Japanese patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.\",\"authors\":\"Taro Horino, Takeshi Kashio, Satoshi Inotani, Yoshio Terada\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/09612033251344051\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>ObjectivesAs there is a lack of reports on the association between anti-lipoprotein lipase (anti-LPL) antibodies and dyslipoproteinemia, we aimed to analyse the association between anti-LPL antibodies and the clinical and serological characteristics of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and cardiovascular (CV) events.MethodsEighty patients with SLE were examined for the presence of anti-LPL antibodies via western blotting. Data on laboratory findings and the occurrence of CV events were retrospectively collected and evaluated. Patients with SLE were classified into two groups according to the detection of anti-LPL antibodies: anti-LPL antibody-positive and antibody-negative.ResultsAnti-LPL antibody immunoglobulin G was detected in 28 patients with SLE (35.0%). Additionally, triglyceride levels tended to be higher in the anti-LPL antibody-positive group than in the anti-LPL antibody-negative group. The former exhibited significantly higher levels of serum albumin, anti-Smith antibody, and IgM than the latter. The incidence of CV events was higher in the anti-LPL antibody-positive group than in the anti-LPL antibody-negative group (35.7% vs 5.8%, <i>p</i> = .001). Additionally, the risk of CV events was significantly higher in the anti-LPL antibody-positive group, with a hazard ratio of 169.20 (95% confidence interval: 5.75-4981.54, <i>p</i> = .003).ConclusionIn this study, the positivity rate of anti-LPL antibodies was high among Japanese patients with SLE. Additionally, a significantly higher incidence of CV events was observed in the anti-LPL antibody-positive group compared to that in the anti-LPL antibody-negative group.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18044,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lupus\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"699-704\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lupus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/09612033251344051\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lupus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09612033251344051","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
由于缺乏关于抗脂蛋白脂肪酶(anti-LPL)抗体与脂蛋白异常血症之间关系的报道,我们旨在分析抗lpl抗体与系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)和心血管(CV)事件患者的临床和血清学特征之间的关系。方法采用免疫印迹法对80例SLE患者进行lpl抗体检测。回顾性收集和评估实验室结果和心血管事件发生的数据。根据lpl抗体检测情况将SLE患者分为lpl抗体阳性和lpl抗体阴性两组。结果28例SLE患者检测到抗lpl抗体免疫球蛋白G(35.0%)。此外,抗lpl抗体阳性组的甘油三酯水平往往高于抗lpl抗体阴性组。前者血清白蛋白、抗史密斯抗体和IgM水平明显高于后者。抗lpl抗体阳性组的CV事件发生率高于抗lpl抗体阴性组(35.7% vs 5.8%, p = .001)。此外,抗lpl抗体阳性组的CV事件风险显著更高,风险比为169.20(95%可信区间:5.75-4981.54,p = 0.003)。结论本研究中,日本SLE患者抗lpl抗体阳性率较高。此外,与抗lpl抗体阴性组相比,抗lpl抗体阳性组的CV事件发生率明显更高。
Clinical significance of anti-lipoprotein lipase antibodies in Japanese patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.
ObjectivesAs there is a lack of reports on the association between anti-lipoprotein lipase (anti-LPL) antibodies and dyslipoproteinemia, we aimed to analyse the association between anti-LPL antibodies and the clinical and serological characteristics of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and cardiovascular (CV) events.MethodsEighty patients with SLE were examined for the presence of anti-LPL antibodies via western blotting. Data on laboratory findings and the occurrence of CV events were retrospectively collected and evaluated. Patients with SLE were classified into two groups according to the detection of anti-LPL antibodies: anti-LPL antibody-positive and antibody-negative.ResultsAnti-LPL antibody immunoglobulin G was detected in 28 patients with SLE (35.0%). Additionally, triglyceride levels tended to be higher in the anti-LPL antibody-positive group than in the anti-LPL antibody-negative group. The former exhibited significantly higher levels of serum albumin, anti-Smith antibody, and IgM than the latter. The incidence of CV events was higher in the anti-LPL antibody-positive group than in the anti-LPL antibody-negative group (35.7% vs 5.8%, p = .001). Additionally, the risk of CV events was significantly higher in the anti-LPL antibody-positive group, with a hazard ratio of 169.20 (95% confidence interval: 5.75-4981.54, p = .003).ConclusionIn this study, the positivity rate of anti-LPL antibodies was high among Japanese patients with SLE. Additionally, a significantly higher incidence of CV events was observed in the anti-LPL antibody-positive group compared to that in the anti-LPL antibody-negative group.
期刊介绍:
The only fully peer reviewed international journal devoted exclusively to lupus (and related disease) research. Lupus includes the most promising new clinical and laboratory-based studies from leading specialists in all lupus-related disciplines. Invaluable reading, with extended coverage, lupus-related disciplines include: Rheumatology, Dermatology, Immunology, Obstetrics, Psychiatry and Cardiovascular Research…