使用监督机器学习算法预测特发性颅内高压诊断的不良视觉结果。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Jacqueline K Shaia, Taseen A Alam, Ilene P Trinh, Jenna R Rock, Jeffrey Y Chu, Nicholas K Schiltz, Rishi P Singh, Katherine E Talcott, Devon A Cohen
{"title":"使用监督机器学习算法预测特发性颅内高压诊断的不良视觉结果。","authors":"Jacqueline K Shaia, Taseen A Alam, Ilene P Trinh, Jenna R Rock, Jeffrey Y Chu, Nicholas K Schiltz, Rishi P Singh, Katherine E Talcott, Devon A Cohen","doi":"10.1097/WNO.0000000000002340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is a vision-threatening disorder mainly affecting women of a reproductive age. Prompt diagnosis and intervention are vital to prevent vision loss, but validated tools to predict visual outcomes are lacking. The purpose of this study was to create a machine learning algorithm predicting poor visual outcomes at the time that the diagnosis of IIH is established, and stratifying risk among those with and without poor visual acuity at presentation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using electronic health records, a retrospective cohort study was conducted between June 1, 2012 and September 30, 2023. Any patient aged 0-70 years who was diagnosed with IIH and met the revised diagnostic criteria was included in the analysis. In total, 391 patients with IIH had final outcomes available and were included in this analysis. Final visual outcomes were reported between 3 months and 1 year after diagnosis. Poor visual outcomes served as the model outcome and was defined as a visual field mean deviation (VFMD) worse than -7 dB or a visual acuity of 20/80 or worse. Both logistic regression and decision trees were used to build predictive models. Models were evaluated using multiple parameters including accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve. The best performing models were validated using a k-fold cross-validation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The decision tree models performed the best and 4 prognostic risk groups were created: critical, high, medium, and low. In the critical risk group, patients who had both high baseline VFMD (worse than -12.59 dB) and identified as non-White had a poor visual outcome risk of 92.6%. A baseline VFMD worse than -9.1 dB resulted in a critical risk of a poor visual outcome at 69.8%. Any patient with a baseline VFMD better than -3.39 dB had a risk of a poor visual outcome at 1.04%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study provides clinicians with valuable prognostic markers to assist in identifying patients who are at critical risk for significant vision loss. Patients with a VFMD worse than -9.1 dB have a critical risk of a poor visual outcome, and this further increased if they identified as a minority patient.</p>","PeriodicalId":16485,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prediction of Poor Visual Outcomes at Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension Diagnosis Using a Supervised Machine Learning Algorithm.\",\"authors\":\"Jacqueline K Shaia, Taseen A Alam, Ilene P Trinh, Jenna R Rock, Jeffrey Y Chu, Nicholas K Schiltz, Rishi P Singh, Katherine E Talcott, Devon A Cohen\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/WNO.0000000000002340\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is a vision-threatening disorder mainly affecting women of a reproductive age. Prompt diagnosis and intervention are vital to prevent vision loss, but validated tools to predict visual outcomes are lacking. The purpose of this study was to create a machine learning algorithm predicting poor visual outcomes at the time that the diagnosis of IIH is established, and stratifying risk among those with and without poor visual acuity at presentation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using electronic health records, a retrospective cohort study was conducted between June 1, 2012 and September 30, 2023. Any patient aged 0-70 years who was diagnosed with IIH and met the revised diagnostic criteria was included in the analysis. In total, 391 patients with IIH had final outcomes available and were included in this analysis. Final visual outcomes were reported between 3 months and 1 year after diagnosis. Poor visual outcomes served as the model outcome and was defined as a visual field mean deviation (VFMD) worse than -7 dB or a visual acuity of 20/80 or worse. Both logistic regression and decision trees were used to build predictive models. Models were evaluated using multiple parameters including accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve. The best performing models were validated using a k-fold cross-validation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The decision tree models performed the best and 4 prognostic risk groups were created: critical, high, medium, and low. In the critical risk group, patients who had both high baseline VFMD (worse than -12.59 dB) and identified as non-White had a poor visual outcome risk of 92.6%. A baseline VFMD worse than -9.1 dB resulted in a critical risk of a poor visual outcome at 69.8%. Any patient with a baseline VFMD better than -3.39 dB had a risk of a poor visual outcome at 1.04%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study provides clinicians with valuable prognostic markers to assist in identifying patients who are at critical risk for significant vision loss. Patients with a VFMD worse than -9.1 dB have a critical risk of a poor visual outcome, and this further increased if they identified as a minority patient.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16485,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/WNO.0000000000002340\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/WNO.0000000000002340","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:特发性颅内高压(IIH)是一种主要影响育龄妇女的视力威胁疾病。及时诊断和干预对预防视力丧失至关重要,但缺乏有效的预测视力结果的工具。本研究的目的是创建一种机器学习算法,在确定IIH诊断时预测视力不良的结果,并对表现时视力不良和不视力不良的患者进行风险分层。方法:采用电子健康记录,对2012年6月1日至2023年9月30日进行回顾性队列研究。任何年龄在0-70岁、诊断为IIH且符合修订后诊断标准的患者都被纳入分析。总共有391例IIH患者有最终结果,并被纳入本分析。最终视力结果在诊断后3个月至1年内报告。视力差作为模型结果,定义为视野平均偏差(VFMD)小于-7 dB或视力为20/80或更差。使用逻辑回归和决策树来建立预测模型。使用多种参数对模型进行评估,包括准确性、灵敏度、特异性和曲线下面积。使用k-fold交叉验证对表现最佳的模型进行验证。结果:决策树模型表现最佳,并建立了4个预后风险组:危急、高、中、低。在临界风险组中,基线VFMD高(大于-12.59 dB)且非white的患者的视力预后风险为92.6%。基线VFMD低于-9.1 dB导致视力不良的临界风险为69.8%。任何基线VFMD高于-3.39 dB的患者视力不良的风险为1.04%。结论:我们的研究为临床医生提供了有价值的预后指标,以帮助识别有严重视力丧失危险的患者。VFMD差于-9.1 dB的患者有严重的视力不良风险,如果他们被确定为少数患者,这一风险进一步增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prediction of Poor Visual Outcomes at Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension Diagnosis Using a Supervised Machine Learning Algorithm.

Background: Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is a vision-threatening disorder mainly affecting women of a reproductive age. Prompt diagnosis and intervention are vital to prevent vision loss, but validated tools to predict visual outcomes are lacking. The purpose of this study was to create a machine learning algorithm predicting poor visual outcomes at the time that the diagnosis of IIH is established, and stratifying risk among those with and without poor visual acuity at presentation.

Methods: Using electronic health records, a retrospective cohort study was conducted between June 1, 2012 and September 30, 2023. Any patient aged 0-70 years who was diagnosed with IIH and met the revised diagnostic criteria was included in the analysis. In total, 391 patients with IIH had final outcomes available and were included in this analysis. Final visual outcomes were reported between 3 months and 1 year after diagnosis. Poor visual outcomes served as the model outcome and was defined as a visual field mean deviation (VFMD) worse than -7 dB or a visual acuity of 20/80 or worse. Both logistic regression and decision trees were used to build predictive models. Models were evaluated using multiple parameters including accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve. The best performing models were validated using a k-fold cross-validation.

Results: The decision tree models performed the best and 4 prognostic risk groups were created: critical, high, medium, and low. In the critical risk group, patients who had both high baseline VFMD (worse than -12.59 dB) and identified as non-White had a poor visual outcome risk of 92.6%. A baseline VFMD worse than -9.1 dB resulted in a critical risk of a poor visual outcome at 69.8%. Any patient with a baseline VFMD better than -3.39 dB had a risk of a poor visual outcome at 1.04%.

Conclusions: Our study provides clinicians with valuable prognostic markers to assist in identifying patients who are at critical risk for significant vision loss. Patients with a VFMD worse than -9.1 dB have a critical risk of a poor visual outcome, and this further increased if they identified as a minority patient.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology
Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
13.80%
发文量
593
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology (JNO) is the official journal of the North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society (NANOS). It is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal that publishes original and commissioned articles related to neuro-ophthalmology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信