综合加护病房危重病人累积体液平衡与静脉充血程度的关系

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 ACOUSTICS
Carmelo José Espinosa-Almanza, Héctor Andrés Ruiz-Ávila, Juan Esteban Gomez-Tobar, Estivalis Acosta-Gutiérrez
{"title":"综合加护病房危重病人累积体液平衡与静脉充血程度的关系","authors":"Carmelo José Espinosa-Almanza, Héctor Andrés Ruiz-Ávila, Juan Esteban Gomez-Tobar, Estivalis Acosta-Gutiérrez","doi":"10.1002/jum.16709","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The Venous Excess Ultrasound Score (VExUS) assesses venous congestion using point-of-care ultrasound. While validated to predict acute kidney injury, its relationship with cumulative fluid balance and clinical edema remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate these associations 72 hours after intensive care unit (ICU) admission.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This analytical observational cohort study included adult ICU patients with Foley catheters inserted at admission for fluid balance quantification. Patients on dialysis or with cirrhosis or abdominal hypertension were excluded. The correlation between cumulative fluid balance, edema clinical grade, and VExUS grade was analyzed. Multivariate analysis identified factors associated with significant venous congestion (VExUS grade ≥2), with statistical significance set at P < .05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 123 patients were included, with a mean age of 60 years (SD ±19.2); 59.3% were male. Venous congestion (VExUS grade ≥1) was observed in 36.5% of patients, despite an average cumulative fluid balance of +0.88 L. Each liter of positive cumulative fluid balance increased the risk of significant congestion (VExUS grade ≥2) by 31% (OR = 1.31; 95% CI: 1.07-1.60). The correlation between clinical edema (Godet scale) and VExUS grade was weak (Spearman rho = 0.27), and clinical edema was not associated with significant congestion (OR = 3.22; 95% CI: 0.77-13.56).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In ICU patients, fluid overload is an early contributor to significant venous congestion (VExUS grade ≥2) but does not correlate with clinical edema grades, highlighting the limitations of clinical edema in assessing venous congestion.</p>","PeriodicalId":17563,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relationship Between Cumulative Fluid Balance and the Degree of Venous Congestion According to VExUS Score in Critically Ill Patients in a General Intensive Care Unit.\",\"authors\":\"Carmelo José Espinosa-Almanza, Héctor Andrés Ruiz-Ávila, Juan Esteban Gomez-Tobar, Estivalis Acosta-Gutiérrez\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jum.16709\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The Venous Excess Ultrasound Score (VExUS) assesses venous congestion using point-of-care ultrasound. While validated to predict acute kidney injury, its relationship with cumulative fluid balance and clinical edema remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate these associations 72 hours after intensive care unit (ICU) admission.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This analytical observational cohort study included adult ICU patients with Foley catheters inserted at admission for fluid balance quantification. Patients on dialysis or with cirrhosis or abdominal hypertension were excluded. The correlation between cumulative fluid balance, edema clinical grade, and VExUS grade was analyzed. Multivariate analysis identified factors associated with significant venous congestion (VExUS grade ≥2), with statistical significance set at P < .05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 123 patients were included, with a mean age of 60 years (SD ±19.2); 59.3% were male. Venous congestion (VExUS grade ≥1) was observed in 36.5% of patients, despite an average cumulative fluid balance of +0.88 L. Each liter of positive cumulative fluid balance increased the risk of significant congestion (VExUS grade ≥2) by 31% (OR = 1.31; 95% CI: 1.07-1.60). The correlation between clinical edema (Godet scale) and VExUS grade was weak (Spearman rho = 0.27), and clinical edema was not associated with significant congestion (OR = 3.22; 95% CI: 0.77-13.56).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In ICU patients, fluid overload is an early contributor to significant venous congestion (VExUS grade ≥2) but does not correlate with clinical edema grades, highlighting the limitations of clinical edema in assessing venous congestion.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17563,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.16709\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ACOUSTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.16709","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:静脉过量超声评分(VExUS)评估静脉充血使用点护理超声。虽然可以预测急性肾损伤,但其与累积体液平衡和临床水肿的关系尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估重症监护病房(ICU)入院72小时后这些关联。方法:本分析性观察性队列研究纳入入院时插入Foley导尿管进行体液平衡量化的ICU成年患者。排除透析患者、肝硬化或腹部高血压患者。分析累积体液平衡、水肿临床分级和VExUS分级之间的相关性。多因素分析发现显著静脉充血相关因素(VExUS分级≥2),差异有统计学意义P。结果:共纳入123例患者,平均年龄60岁(SD±19.2);59.3%为男性。36.5%的患者出现静脉充血(VExUS分级≥1),尽管平均累积体液平衡为+0.88 L。每升体液平衡阳性,严重充血(VExUS分级≥2)的风险增加31% (OR = 1.31;95% ci: 1.07-1.60)。临床水肿(Godet评分)与VExUS分级相关性较弱(Spearman rho = 0.27),临床水肿与明显充血无相关性(OR = 3.22;95% ci: 0.77-13.56)。结论:在ICU患者中,液体超载是严重静脉充血的早期因素(VExUS分级≥2),但与临床水肿分级无关,突出了临床水肿在评估静脉充血方面的局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Relationship Between Cumulative Fluid Balance and the Degree of Venous Congestion According to VExUS Score in Critically Ill Patients in a General Intensive Care Unit.

Objectives: The Venous Excess Ultrasound Score (VExUS) assesses venous congestion using point-of-care ultrasound. While validated to predict acute kidney injury, its relationship with cumulative fluid balance and clinical edema remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate these associations 72 hours after intensive care unit (ICU) admission.

Methods: This analytical observational cohort study included adult ICU patients with Foley catheters inserted at admission for fluid balance quantification. Patients on dialysis or with cirrhosis or abdominal hypertension were excluded. The correlation between cumulative fluid balance, edema clinical grade, and VExUS grade was analyzed. Multivariate analysis identified factors associated with significant venous congestion (VExUS grade ≥2), with statistical significance set at P < .05.

Results: A total of 123 patients were included, with a mean age of 60 years (SD ±19.2); 59.3% were male. Venous congestion (VExUS grade ≥1) was observed in 36.5% of patients, despite an average cumulative fluid balance of +0.88 L. Each liter of positive cumulative fluid balance increased the risk of significant congestion (VExUS grade ≥2) by 31% (OR = 1.31; 95% CI: 1.07-1.60). The correlation between clinical edema (Godet scale) and VExUS grade was weak (Spearman rho = 0.27), and clinical edema was not associated with significant congestion (OR = 3.22; 95% CI: 0.77-13.56).

Conclusions: In ICU patients, fluid overload is an early contributor to significant venous congestion (VExUS grade ≥2) but does not correlate with clinical edema grades, highlighting the limitations of clinical edema in assessing venous congestion.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
205
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine (JUM) is dedicated to the rapid, accurate publication of original articles dealing with all aspects of medical ultrasound, particularly its direct application to patient care but also relevant basic science, advances in instrumentation, and biological effects. The journal is an official publication of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine and publishes articles in a variety of categories, including Original Research papers, Review Articles, Pictorial Essays, Technical Innovations, Case Series, Letters to the Editor, and more, from an international bevy of countries in a continual effort to showcase and promote advances in the ultrasound community. Represented through these efforts are a wide variety of disciplines of ultrasound, including, but not limited to: -Basic Science- Breast Ultrasound- Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound- Dermatology- Echocardiography- Elastography- Emergency Medicine- Fetal Echocardiography- Gastrointestinal Ultrasound- General and Abdominal Ultrasound- Genitourinary Ultrasound- Gynecologic Ultrasound- Head and Neck Ultrasound- High Frequency Clinical and Preclinical Imaging- Interventional-Intraoperative Ultrasound- Musculoskeletal Ultrasound- Neurosonology- Obstetric Ultrasound- Ophthalmologic Ultrasound- Pediatric Ultrasound- Point-of-Care Ultrasound- Public Policy- Superficial Structures- Therapeutic Ultrasound- Ultrasound Education- Ultrasound in Global Health- Urologic Ultrasound- Vascular Ultrasound
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信