青光眼标准自动视野测试分析及面部轮廓的作用。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Sepideh Jamali D, Armin Garmany, Tyler M Kaplan, Mostafa Sadegh Mousavi, Helia Ashourizadeh, Zin Tarakji, Cheryl L Khanna
{"title":"青光眼标准自动视野测试分析及面部轮廓的作用。","authors":"Sepideh Jamali D, Armin Garmany, Tyler M Kaplan, Mostafa Sadegh Mousavi, Helia Ashourizadeh, Zin Tarakji, Cheryl L Khanna","doi":"10.1097/IJG.0000000000002599","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Prcis: </strong>Using a CNN-enhanced platform, 60-4 visual fields identified peripheral glaucomatous defects missed by central testing in mild cases; facial contour correction showed these defects occurred exclusively outside the temporal visual field.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To develop a methodology to separate facial contour-induced visual field defects from defects related to glaucoma in patients with peripheral field defects.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ninety-seven eyes from fifty patients previously diagnosed with glaucoma were enrolled in the study. Thirty-one (62%) participants were male, and 86% were white. The study involved patients with glaucoma who underwent visual field testing using standard automated perimetry, including 10-2, 24-2, 30-2, and 60-4 visual fields. A convolutional neural network (CNN)-enhanced platform, previously developed to identify facial contour-dependent defects in healthy subjects, was used to analyze the visual field data.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>The study included ninety-seven eyes from fifty patients with glaucoma, with the majority having primary open angle glaucoma.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In ninety out of ninety-seven eyes, there were 60-4 visual field defects. However, 20 (22%) of these eyes did not have glaucomatous defects on the 10-2 or 30-2 visual fields. All patients with 60-4 defects in the absence of more central defects had mild glaucoma, and these eyes comprised 38% of the mild glaucoma group. 60-4 visual field increased the sensitivity of identifying glaucoma in mild disease. Without facial contour, the 60-4 visual field mean threshold summation was 1099.6±346.6 dB, and decreased to 1057±331 dB when accounting for facial contour, which affected 8.03±4.02% of test points. Facial contour-dependent visual field defects were exclusively found outside the temporal visual field.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study demonstrated the potential utility of 60-4 visual fields for identifying early functional glaucomatous changes that may not be detected by more central visual field tests (10-2 or 30-2). It may be important to consider peripheral visual field defects, which can be affected by facial contour, in the diagnosis and monitoring of glaucoma, particularly in mild cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":15938,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Glaucoma","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of Standard Automated Visual Field Tests in Glaucoma and the Role of Facial Contour.\",\"authors\":\"Sepideh Jamali D, Armin Garmany, Tyler M Kaplan, Mostafa Sadegh Mousavi, Helia Ashourizadeh, Zin Tarakji, Cheryl L Khanna\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/IJG.0000000000002599\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Prcis: </strong>Using a CNN-enhanced platform, 60-4 visual fields identified peripheral glaucomatous defects missed by central testing in mild cases; facial contour correction showed these defects occurred exclusively outside the temporal visual field.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To develop a methodology to separate facial contour-induced visual field defects from defects related to glaucoma in patients with peripheral field defects.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ninety-seven eyes from fifty patients previously diagnosed with glaucoma were enrolled in the study. Thirty-one (62%) participants were male, and 86% were white. The study involved patients with glaucoma who underwent visual field testing using standard automated perimetry, including 10-2, 24-2, 30-2, and 60-4 visual fields. A convolutional neural network (CNN)-enhanced platform, previously developed to identify facial contour-dependent defects in healthy subjects, was used to analyze the visual field data.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>The study included ninety-seven eyes from fifty patients with glaucoma, with the majority having primary open angle glaucoma.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In ninety out of ninety-seven eyes, there were 60-4 visual field defects. However, 20 (22%) of these eyes did not have glaucomatous defects on the 10-2 or 30-2 visual fields. All patients with 60-4 defects in the absence of more central defects had mild glaucoma, and these eyes comprised 38% of the mild glaucoma group. 60-4 visual field increased the sensitivity of identifying glaucoma in mild disease. Without facial contour, the 60-4 visual field mean threshold summation was 1099.6±346.6 dB, and decreased to 1057±331 dB when accounting for facial contour, which affected 8.03±4.02% of test points. Facial contour-dependent visual field defects were exclusively found outside the temporal visual field.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study demonstrated the potential utility of 60-4 visual fields for identifying early functional glaucomatous changes that may not be detected by more central visual field tests (10-2 or 30-2). It may be important to consider peripheral visual field defects, which can be affected by facial contour, in the diagnosis and monitoring of glaucoma, particularly in mild cases.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15938,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Glaucoma\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Glaucoma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000002599\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Glaucoma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000002599","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

实践:使用cnn增强平台,60-4视野识别出轻度患者中央检测遗漏的周围性青光眼缺陷;面部轮廓矫正显示这些缺陷完全发生在颞部视野之外。目的:建立一种区分周围视野缺损患者面部轮廓性视野缺损与青光眼相关缺损的方法。方法:先前诊断为青光眼的50例患者的97只眼睛被纳入研究。31名(62%)参与者是男性,86%是白人。该研究纳入了青光眼患者,他们使用标准的自动视距仪进行视野测试,包括10-2、24-2、30-2和60-4视野。卷积神经网络(CNN)增强平台,先前开发用于识别面部轮廓依赖缺陷的健康受试者,被用于分析视野数据。患者:该研究包括50例青光眼患者的97只眼睛,其中大多数为原发性开角型青光眼。结果:97只眼中有90只眼视野缺损60-4个。然而,其中20只(22%)的眼睛在10-2或30-2视野上没有青光眼缺陷。所有有60-4缺陷而没有更多中心缺陷的患者都是轻度青光眼,这些眼睛占轻度青光眼组的38%。60-4视野增加了轻度青光眼的识别敏感性。不考虑面部轮廓时,60-4视野平均阈值总和为1099.6±346.6 dB,考虑面部轮廓时,60-4视野平均阈值总和为1057±331 dB,影响8.03±4.02%的测试点。面部轮廓相关的视野缺陷只存在于时间视野之外。结论:该研究证明了60-4视野在识别早期功能性青光眼变化方面的潜在效用,这些变化可能无法通过更多的中央视野测试(10-2或30-2)检测到。在青光眼的诊断和监测中,特别是在轻度病例中,考虑周围视野缺陷可能是重要的,因为周围视野缺陷可能受到面部轮廓的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of Standard Automated Visual Field Tests in Glaucoma and the Role of Facial Contour.

Prcis: Using a CNN-enhanced platform, 60-4 visual fields identified peripheral glaucomatous defects missed by central testing in mild cases; facial contour correction showed these defects occurred exclusively outside the temporal visual field.

Purpose: To develop a methodology to separate facial contour-induced visual field defects from defects related to glaucoma in patients with peripheral field defects.

Methods: Ninety-seven eyes from fifty patients previously diagnosed with glaucoma were enrolled in the study. Thirty-one (62%) participants were male, and 86% were white. The study involved patients with glaucoma who underwent visual field testing using standard automated perimetry, including 10-2, 24-2, 30-2, and 60-4 visual fields. A convolutional neural network (CNN)-enhanced platform, previously developed to identify facial contour-dependent defects in healthy subjects, was used to analyze the visual field data.

Patients: The study included ninety-seven eyes from fifty patients with glaucoma, with the majority having primary open angle glaucoma.

Results: In ninety out of ninety-seven eyes, there were 60-4 visual field defects. However, 20 (22%) of these eyes did not have glaucomatous defects on the 10-2 or 30-2 visual fields. All patients with 60-4 defects in the absence of more central defects had mild glaucoma, and these eyes comprised 38% of the mild glaucoma group. 60-4 visual field increased the sensitivity of identifying glaucoma in mild disease. Without facial contour, the 60-4 visual field mean threshold summation was 1099.6±346.6 dB, and decreased to 1057±331 dB when accounting for facial contour, which affected 8.03±4.02% of test points. Facial contour-dependent visual field defects were exclusively found outside the temporal visual field.

Conclusion: The study demonstrated the potential utility of 60-4 visual fields for identifying early functional glaucomatous changes that may not be detected by more central visual field tests (10-2 or 30-2). It may be important to consider peripheral visual field defects, which can be affected by facial contour, in the diagnosis and monitoring of glaucoma, particularly in mild cases.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Glaucoma
Journal of Glaucoma 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
10.00%
发文量
330
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Glaucoma is a peer reviewed journal addressing the spectrum of issues affecting definition, diagnosis, and management of glaucoma and providing a forum for lively and stimulating discussion of clinical, scientific, and socioeconomic factors affecting care of glaucoma patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信