{"title":"应用机器学习技术诊断根管治疗牙齿体内垂直根断裂。","authors":"Shujun Ran, Qiang Wang, Jia Wang, Jing Huang, Wei Zhou, Pengfei Zhang, Keyong Yuan, Yushan Cheng, Shensheng Gu, Jingjing Zhu, Zhengwei Huang","doi":"10.1016/j.joen.2025.05.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aimed to diagnose vertical root fracture (VRF) of endodontically treated teeth using clinical features and bone loss information from cone beam computed tomography with machine learning models.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 887 patients with 941 teeth undergoing endodontic surgery were included in this retrospective study. The clinical factors and bone defects detected via cone beam computed tomography were measured and recorded. Linear machine learning models, logistic regression model and nonlinear models, including XGBoost, LightGBM, and CatBoost were used to diagnose VRF. Model performance was evaluated using 5-fold cross-validation and based on various performance parameters, including the area under the curve, sensitivity, specificity, precision, and F score. Model interpretations were visualized by Shapley Additive Explanations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 941 teeth, 112 VRF teeth (11.9%) were identified during endodontic surgery or after tooth extraction. XGBoost and LightGBM showed excellent performance with area under the curves of 0.98 [0.96, 0.99], specificity of 0.978 and 0.983, sensitivity of 0.883 and 0.803, and precision of 0.846 and 0.865, respectively. Shapley Additive Explanations values showed that lingual/buccal bone defect, the ratio of bone defect height above the root apex to the defect total height, width of bone defect and age were the top 5 contributors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Machine learning models for the diagnosis of VRF using age, sex, tooth type, the quality of root canal filling and bone loss position, height, width, and depth are valuable for clinical decision making after root canal treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":15703,"journal":{"name":"Journal of endodontics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnosis of In Vivo Vertical Root Fracture in Endodontically Treated Teeth Using Machine Learning Techniques.\",\"authors\":\"Shujun Ran, Qiang Wang, Jia Wang, Jing Huang, Wei Zhou, Pengfei Zhang, Keyong Yuan, Yushan Cheng, Shensheng Gu, Jingjing Zhu, Zhengwei Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.joen.2025.05.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aimed to diagnose vertical root fracture (VRF) of endodontically treated teeth using clinical features and bone loss information from cone beam computed tomography with machine learning models.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 887 patients with 941 teeth undergoing endodontic surgery were included in this retrospective study. The clinical factors and bone defects detected via cone beam computed tomography were measured and recorded. Linear machine learning models, logistic regression model and nonlinear models, including XGBoost, LightGBM, and CatBoost were used to diagnose VRF. Model performance was evaluated using 5-fold cross-validation and based on various performance parameters, including the area under the curve, sensitivity, specificity, precision, and F score. Model interpretations were visualized by Shapley Additive Explanations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 941 teeth, 112 VRF teeth (11.9%) were identified during endodontic surgery or after tooth extraction. XGBoost and LightGBM showed excellent performance with area under the curves of 0.98 [0.96, 0.99], specificity of 0.978 and 0.983, sensitivity of 0.883 and 0.803, and precision of 0.846 and 0.865, respectively. Shapley Additive Explanations values showed that lingual/buccal bone defect, the ratio of bone defect height above the root apex to the defect total height, width of bone defect and age were the top 5 contributors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Machine learning models for the diagnosis of VRF using age, sex, tooth type, the quality of root canal filling and bone loss position, height, width, and depth are valuable for clinical decision making after root canal treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15703,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of endodontics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of endodontics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2025.05.004\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of endodontics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2025.05.004","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Diagnosis of In Vivo Vertical Root Fracture in Endodontically Treated Teeth Using Machine Learning Techniques.
Introduction: This study aimed to diagnose vertical root fracture (VRF) of endodontically treated teeth using clinical features and bone loss information from cone beam computed tomography with machine learning models.
Methods: A total of 887 patients with 941 teeth undergoing endodontic surgery were included in this retrospective study. The clinical factors and bone defects detected via cone beam computed tomography were measured and recorded. Linear machine learning models, logistic regression model and nonlinear models, including XGBoost, LightGBM, and CatBoost were used to diagnose VRF. Model performance was evaluated using 5-fold cross-validation and based on various performance parameters, including the area under the curve, sensitivity, specificity, precision, and F score. Model interpretations were visualized by Shapley Additive Explanations.
Results: Of the 941 teeth, 112 VRF teeth (11.9%) were identified during endodontic surgery or after tooth extraction. XGBoost and LightGBM showed excellent performance with area under the curves of 0.98 [0.96, 0.99], specificity of 0.978 and 0.983, sensitivity of 0.883 and 0.803, and precision of 0.846 and 0.865, respectively. Shapley Additive Explanations values showed that lingual/buccal bone defect, the ratio of bone defect height above the root apex to the defect total height, width of bone defect and age were the top 5 contributors.
Conclusions: Machine learning models for the diagnosis of VRF using age, sex, tooth type, the quality of root canal filling and bone loss position, height, width, and depth are valuable for clinical decision making after root canal treatment.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Endodontics, the official journal of the American Association of Endodontists, publishes scientific articles, case reports and comparison studies evaluating materials and methods of pulp conservation and endodontic treatment. Endodontists and general dentists can learn about new concepts in root canal treatment and the latest advances in techniques and instrumentation in the one journal that helps them keep pace with rapid changes in this field.