{"title":"临床医生对未成熟前牙再生牙髓治疗的看法——一项基于网络的观察性研究。","authors":"Alexander Brett, Federico Foschi, Shanon Patel","doi":"10.1016/j.joen.2025.05.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Regenerative endodontic procedures (REPs) are beneficial in preserving infected immature permanent teeth. The aim of this observational study was to assess treatment planning of REPs, geographical differences in their provision, clinical hesitancy and provision rate.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Digitally manipulated radiographs showing varying degrees of root development in a maxillary central incisor with apical pathosis were used in an anonymized online questionnaire to assess clinical predisposition. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 160 participants (59.4% specialist endodontists), 73.1% favored REPs for the most immature apices, decreasing with root maturity. Specialist experience did not impact REP provision. UK endodontists performed REPs less frequently than international counterparts. Key perceived REP benefits included fracture resistance and root lengthening. Hesitancy stemmed from unfamiliarity (32.9%) and healing concerns (25.9%). Confidence varied and 25% had never performed a REP.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>REPs are generally appropriately treatment planned, although more education with regards to clinical suitability and case selection is suggested. Geographical variance in provision of REPs is apparent between the UK and non-UK endodontists. Hesitancy exists in the provision of REPs, and prevalence of provision is low.</p>","PeriodicalId":15703,"journal":{"name":"Journal of endodontics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinician Perspective of Regenerative Endodontic Procedures for Immature Anterior Teeth: An Observational Web-based Study.\",\"authors\":\"Alexander Brett, Federico Foschi, Shanon Patel\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.joen.2025.05.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Regenerative endodontic procedures (REPs) are beneficial in preserving infected immature permanent teeth. The aim of this observational study was to assess treatment planning of REPs, geographical differences in their provision, clinical hesitancy and provision rate.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Digitally manipulated radiographs showing varying degrees of root development in a maxillary central incisor with apical pathosis were used in an anonymized online questionnaire to assess clinical predisposition. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 160 participants (59.4% specialist endodontists), 73.1% favored REPs for the most immature apices, decreasing with root maturity. Specialist experience did not impact REP provision. UK endodontists performed REPs less frequently than international counterparts. Key perceived REP benefits included fracture resistance and root lengthening. Hesitancy stemmed from unfamiliarity (32.9%) and healing concerns (25.9%). Confidence varied and 25% had never performed a REP.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>REPs are generally appropriately treatment planned, although more education with regards to clinical suitability and case selection is suggested. Geographical variance in provision of REPs is apparent between the UK and non-UK endodontists. Hesitancy exists in the provision of REPs, and prevalence of provision is low.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15703,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of endodontics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of endodontics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2025.05.005\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of endodontics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2025.05.005","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Clinician Perspective of Regenerative Endodontic Procedures for Immature Anterior Teeth: An Observational Web-based Study.
Introduction: Regenerative endodontic procedures (REPs) are beneficial in preserving infected immature permanent teeth. The aim of this observational study was to assess treatment planning of REPs, geographical differences in their provision, clinical hesitancy and provision rate.
Methods: Digitally manipulated radiographs showing varying degrees of root development in a maxillary central incisor with apical pathosis were used in an anonymized online questionnaire to assess clinical predisposition. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics.
Results: Among 160 participants (59.4% specialist endodontists), 73.1% favored REPs for the most immature apices, decreasing with root maturity. Specialist experience did not impact REP provision. UK endodontists performed REPs less frequently than international counterparts. Key perceived REP benefits included fracture resistance and root lengthening. Hesitancy stemmed from unfamiliarity (32.9%) and healing concerns (25.9%). Confidence varied and 25% had never performed a REP.
Conclusion: REPs are generally appropriately treatment planned, although more education with regards to clinical suitability and case selection is suggested. Geographical variance in provision of REPs is apparent between the UK and non-UK endodontists. Hesitancy exists in the provision of REPs, and prevalence of provision is low.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Endodontics, the official journal of the American Association of Endodontists, publishes scientific articles, case reports and comparison studies evaluating materials and methods of pulp conservation and endodontic treatment. Endodontists and general dentists can learn about new concepts in root canal treatment and the latest advances in techniques and instrumentation in the one journal that helps them keep pace with rapid changes in this field.