临床医生对未成熟前牙再生牙髓治疗的看法——一项基于网络的观察性研究。

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Alexander Brett, Federico Foschi, Shanon Patel
{"title":"临床医生对未成熟前牙再生牙髓治疗的看法——一项基于网络的观察性研究。","authors":"Alexander Brett, Federico Foschi, Shanon Patel","doi":"10.1016/j.joen.2025.05.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Regenerative endodontic procedures (REPs) are beneficial in preserving infected immature permanent teeth. The aim of this observational study was to assess treatment planning of REPs, geographical differences in their provision, clinical hesitancy and provision rate.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Digitally manipulated radiographs showing varying degrees of root development in a maxillary central incisor with apical pathosis were used in an anonymized online questionnaire to assess clinical predisposition. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 160 participants (59.4% specialist endodontists), 73.1% favored REPs for the most immature apices, decreasing with root maturity. Specialist experience did not impact REP provision. UK endodontists performed REPs less frequently than international counterparts. Key perceived REP benefits included fracture resistance and root lengthening. Hesitancy stemmed from unfamiliarity (32.9%) and healing concerns (25.9%). Confidence varied and 25% had never performed a REP.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>REPs are generally appropriately treatment planned, although more education with regards to clinical suitability and case selection is suggested. Geographical variance in provision of REPs is apparent between the UK and non-UK endodontists. Hesitancy exists in the provision of REPs, and prevalence of provision is low.</p>","PeriodicalId":15703,"journal":{"name":"Journal of endodontics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinician Perspective of Regenerative Endodontic Procedures for Immature Anterior Teeth: An Observational Web-based Study.\",\"authors\":\"Alexander Brett, Federico Foschi, Shanon Patel\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.joen.2025.05.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Regenerative endodontic procedures (REPs) are beneficial in preserving infected immature permanent teeth. The aim of this observational study was to assess treatment planning of REPs, geographical differences in their provision, clinical hesitancy and provision rate.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Digitally manipulated radiographs showing varying degrees of root development in a maxillary central incisor with apical pathosis were used in an anonymized online questionnaire to assess clinical predisposition. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 160 participants (59.4% specialist endodontists), 73.1% favored REPs for the most immature apices, decreasing with root maturity. Specialist experience did not impact REP provision. UK endodontists performed REPs less frequently than international counterparts. Key perceived REP benefits included fracture resistance and root lengthening. Hesitancy stemmed from unfamiliarity (32.9%) and healing concerns (25.9%). Confidence varied and 25% had never performed a REP.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>REPs are generally appropriately treatment planned, although more education with regards to clinical suitability and case selection is suggested. Geographical variance in provision of REPs is apparent between the UK and non-UK endodontists. Hesitancy exists in the provision of REPs, and prevalence of provision is low.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15703,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of endodontics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of endodontics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2025.05.005\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of endodontics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2025.05.005","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

再生牙髓治疗(REPs)对保存感染的未成熟恒牙是有益的。本观察性研究的目的是评估REPs的治疗计划、提供的地理差异、临床犹豫和提供率。方法:使用数字处理的x线片显示上颌中切牙不同程度的牙根发育,并进行匿名在线问卷调查,以评估临床易感性。数据采用描述性统计进行分析。结果:在160名参与者中(59.4%的专家牙髓医生),73.1%的人赞成对最不成熟的根尖进行REPs,随着根的成熟而降低。专家经验不会影响REP的提供。英国牙髓医生进行rep的频率低于国际同行。REP的主要益处包括抗骨折和根延长。犹豫源于不熟悉(32.9%)和治疗顾虑(25.9%)。信心各不相同,25%的人从未进行过rep。结论:rep通常是适当的治疗计划,尽管建议更多关于临床适用性和病例选择的教育。提供rep的地理差异在英国和非英国牙髓医生之间是明显的。rep的提供存在犹豫,且提供的普及率较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinician Perspective of Regenerative Endodontic Procedures for Immature Anterior Teeth: An Observational Web-based Study.

Introduction: Regenerative endodontic procedures (REPs) are beneficial in preserving infected immature permanent teeth. The aim of this observational study was to assess treatment planning of REPs, geographical differences in their provision, clinical hesitancy and provision rate.

Methods: Digitally manipulated radiographs showing varying degrees of root development in a maxillary central incisor with apical pathosis were used in an anonymized online questionnaire to assess clinical predisposition. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics.

Results: Among 160 participants (59.4% specialist endodontists), 73.1% favored REPs for the most immature apices, decreasing with root maturity. Specialist experience did not impact REP provision. UK endodontists performed REPs less frequently than international counterparts. Key perceived REP benefits included fracture resistance and root lengthening. Hesitancy stemmed from unfamiliarity (32.9%) and healing concerns (25.9%). Confidence varied and 25% had never performed a REP.

Conclusion: REPs are generally appropriately treatment planned, although more education with regards to clinical suitability and case selection is suggested. Geographical variance in provision of REPs is apparent between the UK and non-UK endodontists. Hesitancy exists in the provision of REPs, and prevalence of provision is low.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of endodontics
Journal of endodontics 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
9.50%
发文量
224
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Endodontics, the official journal of the American Association of Endodontists, publishes scientific articles, case reports and comparison studies evaluating materials and methods of pulp conservation and endodontic treatment. Endodontists and general dentists can learn about new concepts in root canal treatment and the latest advances in techniques and instrumentation in the one journal that helps them keep pace with rapid changes in this field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信