方案:经体重调整后的0.5%罗哌卡因有效容积用于肩关节镜手术的肋锁臂神经丛阻滞-颈神经丛阻滞联合治疗:一项剂量发现研究方案。

IF 2.6 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2025-05-16 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0324135
Jianlin Wang, Liyong Yuan, Zhong Mei, Zhimin Sheng, Xiaolu Huang, Miao Zhu
{"title":"方案:经体重调整后的0.5%罗哌卡因有效容积用于肩关节镜手术的肋锁臂神经丛阻滞-颈神经丛阻滞联合治疗:一项剂量发现研究方案。","authors":"Jianlin Wang, Liyong Yuan, Zhong Mei, Zhimin Sheng, Xiaolu Huang, Miao Zhu","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0324135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Rotator cuff injuries are common clinically, and arthroscopic repair is widely applied. Postoperative analgesia can be assisted by the interscalene brachial plexus block; however, it comes with side effects, among which a high incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis (HDP) is included. Costoclavicular brachial plexus-cervical plexus blocks (CCB-CPBs) offer comparable analgesia with lower HDP risk, yet local anesthetic volume issues can affect outcomes. In patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgeries under general anesthesia with CCB-CPBs, the aim is to determine the optimal dose of ropivacaine for postoperative analgesia while avoiding hemidiaphragmatic paralysis (HDP).</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>This trial will be a prospective, single-arm, double-blind dose finding study. We plan to enroll 40 patients who will be scheduled to undergo arthroscopic shoulder surgeries under anesthesia that combines general anesthesia with CCB-CPBs. The volume of the local anesthetic will be determined by adopting the Up-and-Down sequential allocation study design. The primary outcome will be the numerical rating scale (NRS) scores of the patients prior to their departure from the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU). As for the secondary outcomes, they will include the ipsilateral diaphragmatic excursion, the characteristics of the sensory-motor block, the occurrence of complications, as well as the consumption of fentanyl during the operation.</p><p><strong>Ethics and dissemination: </strong>Approval for the protocol of this study was granted by the Ethics Committee of Ningbo No. 6 Hospital in Zhejiang Province, China, on July 29, 2024 (Approval No. 2024-67L). Once the study is completed, we are committed to guaranteeing that the results will be accessible to the public, irrespective of the outcome. This will involve either publishing them in an appropriate journal or presenting them orally at academic conferences.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Trial registration number ChiCTR2400090292.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"20 5","pages":"e0324135"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12083839/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Protocol: Weight-adjusted effective volume of 0.5% ropivacaine for combined costoclavicular brachial plexus block-cervical plexus blocks undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery: A dose-finding study protocol.\",\"authors\":\"Jianlin Wang, Liyong Yuan, Zhong Mei, Zhimin Sheng, Xiaolu Huang, Miao Zhu\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pone.0324135\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Rotator cuff injuries are common clinically, and arthroscopic repair is widely applied. Postoperative analgesia can be assisted by the interscalene brachial plexus block; however, it comes with side effects, among which a high incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis (HDP) is included. Costoclavicular brachial plexus-cervical plexus blocks (CCB-CPBs) offer comparable analgesia with lower HDP risk, yet local anesthetic volume issues can affect outcomes. In patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgeries under general anesthesia with CCB-CPBs, the aim is to determine the optimal dose of ropivacaine for postoperative analgesia while avoiding hemidiaphragmatic paralysis (HDP).</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>This trial will be a prospective, single-arm, double-blind dose finding study. We plan to enroll 40 patients who will be scheduled to undergo arthroscopic shoulder surgeries under anesthesia that combines general anesthesia with CCB-CPBs. The volume of the local anesthetic will be determined by adopting the Up-and-Down sequential allocation study design. The primary outcome will be the numerical rating scale (NRS) scores of the patients prior to their departure from the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU). As for the secondary outcomes, they will include the ipsilateral diaphragmatic excursion, the characteristics of the sensory-motor block, the occurrence of complications, as well as the consumption of fentanyl during the operation.</p><p><strong>Ethics and dissemination: </strong>Approval for the protocol of this study was granted by the Ethics Committee of Ningbo No. 6 Hospital in Zhejiang Province, China, on July 29, 2024 (Approval No. 2024-67L). Once the study is completed, we are committed to guaranteeing that the results will be accessible to the public, irrespective of the outcome. This will involve either publishing them in an appropriate journal or presenting them orally at academic conferences.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Trial registration number ChiCTR2400090292.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"volume\":\"20 5\",\"pages\":\"e0324135\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12083839/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0324135\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0324135","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:肩袖损伤是临床上常见的损伤,关节镜下修复应用广泛。斜角肌间臂丛阻滞可辅助术后镇痛;然而,它也有副作用,其中包括高发病率的半膈肌麻痹(HDP)。肋锁骨臂丛-颈丛阻滞(CCB-CPBs)提供了相当低HDP风险的镇痛,但局麻量问题可能影响结果。在接受关节镜肩关节手术全麻下使用CCB-CPBs的患者中,目的是确定罗哌卡因术后镇痛的最佳剂量,同时避免半膈肌麻痹(HDP)。方法与分析:本试验为前瞻性、单组、双盲剂量发现研究。我们计划招募40名患者,他们将在全身麻醉和CCB-CPBs联合麻醉下接受关节镜肩关节手术。采用上下序贯分配研究设计确定局麻药的剂量。主要结果将是患者离开麻醉后护理单元(PACU)前的数值评定量表(NRS)评分。次要结果包括同侧膈肌偏移、感觉-运动阻滞的特点、并发症的发生以及术中芬太尼的用量。伦理与传播:中国浙江省宁波市第六医院伦理委员会于2024年7月29日批准了本研究的方案(批准号2024- 67l)。一旦研究完成,我们承诺保证公众可以获得研究结果,无论结果如何。这将包括在适当的期刊上发表论文或在学术会议上口头发表论文。试验注册:试验注册号ChiCTR2400090292。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Protocol: Weight-adjusted effective volume of 0.5% ropivacaine for combined costoclavicular brachial plexus block-cervical plexus blocks undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery: A dose-finding study protocol.

Protocol: Weight-adjusted effective volume of 0.5% ropivacaine for combined costoclavicular brachial plexus block-cervical plexus blocks undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery: A dose-finding study protocol.

Protocol: Weight-adjusted effective volume of 0.5% ropivacaine for combined costoclavicular brachial plexus block-cervical plexus blocks undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery: A dose-finding study protocol.

Protocol: Weight-adjusted effective volume of 0.5% ropivacaine for combined costoclavicular brachial plexus block-cervical plexus blocks undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery: A dose-finding study protocol.

Introduction: Rotator cuff injuries are common clinically, and arthroscopic repair is widely applied. Postoperative analgesia can be assisted by the interscalene brachial plexus block; however, it comes with side effects, among which a high incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis (HDP) is included. Costoclavicular brachial plexus-cervical plexus blocks (CCB-CPBs) offer comparable analgesia with lower HDP risk, yet local anesthetic volume issues can affect outcomes. In patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgeries under general anesthesia with CCB-CPBs, the aim is to determine the optimal dose of ropivacaine for postoperative analgesia while avoiding hemidiaphragmatic paralysis (HDP).

Methods and analysis: This trial will be a prospective, single-arm, double-blind dose finding study. We plan to enroll 40 patients who will be scheduled to undergo arthroscopic shoulder surgeries under anesthesia that combines general anesthesia with CCB-CPBs. The volume of the local anesthetic will be determined by adopting the Up-and-Down sequential allocation study design. The primary outcome will be the numerical rating scale (NRS) scores of the patients prior to their departure from the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU). As for the secondary outcomes, they will include the ipsilateral diaphragmatic excursion, the characteristics of the sensory-motor block, the occurrence of complications, as well as the consumption of fentanyl during the operation.

Ethics and dissemination: Approval for the protocol of this study was granted by the Ethics Committee of Ningbo No. 6 Hospital in Zhejiang Province, China, on July 29, 2024 (Approval No. 2024-67L). Once the study is completed, we are committed to guaranteeing that the results will be accessible to the public, irrespective of the outcome. This will involve either publishing them in an appropriate journal or presenting them orally at academic conferences.

Trial registration: Trial registration number ChiCTR2400090292.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
14242
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信