Guoqiang Qin, Jianxiang Wei, Yuehong Sun, Wenwen Du
{"title":"临床医学因果推理研究进展:基于引文空间的文献计量学分析。","authors":"Guoqiang Qin, Jianxiang Wei, Yuehong Sun, Wenwen Du","doi":"10.2147/JMDH.S516826","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Causal inference in clinical medicine provides scientific evidence for precision medicine and individualized treatment by revealing the true associations between interventions and health outcomes. This study aims to conduct a comprehensive bibliometric analysis to identify current research trends, primary themes, and future directions for the application of causal inference in clinical medicine.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a literature search in the Web of Science database using causal inference and medical terminology as subject keywords, covering the period from January 1986 to December 2024. After screening, we obtained 4,316 documents for analysis. Utilizing CiteSpace to generate network diagrams, we analyzed data related to the number of publications, citation analysis, collaboration relationships, keyword co-occurrence, and highlighted terms to illustrate the knowledge map and collaboration network in this field.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Publications on medical causal inference shows a fluctuating growth trend over time. The United States was the top contributors to this field. Harvard University is the leading research institution. George David Smith is the most prolific author, Robbins JM is the most cited scholar. The major research hotspots concentrated in fields such as epidemiology, coronary heart disease and health. Notably, marginal structural models, counterfactual forecasting, and Mendelian randomization have consistently been key methodologies in research. The burstness of keywords reveals that big data, DNA methylation, and robust estimation are emerging research directions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In clinical research, counterfactual forecasting provides prospective guidance for optimizing clinical strategies; Mendelian randomization helps uncover potential therapeutic targets; and marginal structural models enhance the accuracy of causal effect estimation in clinical studies. The future integration of various data sources to improve causal inference methods is anticipated to enhance the sensitivity and specificity of trials, ultimately elucidating the complex mechanisms of diseases and drug effects. The literature retrieve strategy and the metrics of the tools adopted may have a certain impact on the results of this study.</p>","PeriodicalId":16357,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare","volume":"18 ","pages":"2603-2627"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12077415/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Research Advance of Causal Inference in Clinical Medicine: A Bibliometrics Analysis via Citespace.\",\"authors\":\"Guoqiang Qin, Jianxiang Wei, Yuehong Sun, Wenwen Du\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/JMDH.S516826\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Causal inference in clinical medicine provides scientific evidence for precision medicine and individualized treatment by revealing the true associations between interventions and health outcomes. This study aims to conduct a comprehensive bibliometric analysis to identify current research trends, primary themes, and future directions for the application of causal inference in clinical medicine.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a literature search in the Web of Science database using causal inference and medical terminology as subject keywords, covering the period from January 1986 to December 2024. After screening, we obtained 4,316 documents for analysis. Utilizing CiteSpace to generate network diagrams, we analyzed data related to the number of publications, citation analysis, collaboration relationships, keyword co-occurrence, and highlighted terms to illustrate the knowledge map and collaboration network in this field.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Publications on medical causal inference shows a fluctuating growth trend over time. The United States was the top contributors to this field. Harvard University is the leading research institution. George David Smith is the most prolific author, Robbins JM is the most cited scholar. The major research hotspots concentrated in fields such as epidemiology, coronary heart disease and health. Notably, marginal structural models, counterfactual forecasting, and Mendelian randomization have consistently been key methodologies in research. The burstness of keywords reveals that big data, DNA methylation, and robust estimation are emerging research directions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In clinical research, counterfactual forecasting provides prospective guidance for optimizing clinical strategies; Mendelian randomization helps uncover potential therapeutic targets; and marginal structural models enhance the accuracy of causal effect estimation in clinical studies. The future integration of various data sources to improve causal inference methods is anticipated to enhance the sensitivity and specificity of trials, ultimately elucidating the complex mechanisms of diseases and drug effects. The literature retrieve strategy and the metrics of the tools adopted may have a certain impact on the results of this study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16357,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"2603-2627\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12077415/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S516826\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S516826","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:临床医学因果推理通过揭示干预措施与健康结果之间的真实关联,为精准医疗和个体化治疗提供科学依据。本研究旨在进行全面的文献计量分析,以确定目前的研究趋势、主要主题和因果推理在临床医学中的应用的未来方向。方法:以因果推理和医学术语为主题关键词,检索Web of Science数据库,检索时间为1986年1月至2024年12月。经过筛选,我们获得了4316份文件进行分析。利用CiteSpace软件生成网络图,对论文发表数量、引文分析、协作关系、关键词共现、高亮词等数据进行分析,描绘该领域的知识图谱和协作网络。结果:医学因果推理的出版物呈现出随时间波动的增长趋势。美国是该领域的最大贡献者。哈佛大学是领先的研究机构。乔治·大卫·史密斯是最多产的作家,罗宾斯JM是被引用最多的学者。主要研究热点集中在流行病学、冠心病、健康等领域。值得注意的是,边际结构模型、反事实预测和孟德尔随机化一直是研究中的关键方法。关键词的突发性表明,大数据、DNA甲基化和稳健估计是新兴的研究方向。结论:在临床研究中,反事实预测对优化临床策略具有前瞻性指导作用;孟德尔随机化有助于发现潜在的治疗靶点;边际结构模型提高了临床研究中因果效应估计的准确性。未来整合各种数据源以改进因果推理方法有望提高试验的敏感性和特异性,最终阐明疾病和药物作用的复杂机制。文献检索策略和采用的工具度量可能对本研究的结果有一定的影响。
Research Advance of Causal Inference in Clinical Medicine: A Bibliometrics Analysis via Citespace.
Objective: Causal inference in clinical medicine provides scientific evidence for precision medicine and individualized treatment by revealing the true associations between interventions and health outcomes. This study aims to conduct a comprehensive bibliometric analysis to identify current research trends, primary themes, and future directions for the application of causal inference in clinical medicine.
Methods: We conducted a literature search in the Web of Science database using causal inference and medical terminology as subject keywords, covering the period from January 1986 to December 2024. After screening, we obtained 4,316 documents for analysis. Utilizing CiteSpace to generate network diagrams, we analyzed data related to the number of publications, citation analysis, collaboration relationships, keyword co-occurrence, and highlighted terms to illustrate the knowledge map and collaboration network in this field.
Results: Publications on medical causal inference shows a fluctuating growth trend over time. The United States was the top contributors to this field. Harvard University is the leading research institution. George David Smith is the most prolific author, Robbins JM is the most cited scholar. The major research hotspots concentrated in fields such as epidemiology, coronary heart disease and health. Notably, marginal structural models, counterfactual forecasting, and Mendelian randomization have consistently been key methodologies in research. The burstness of keywords reveals that big data, DNA methylation, and robust estimation are emerging research directions.
Conclusion: In clinical research, counterfactual forecasting provides prospective guidance for optimizing clinical strategies; Mendelian randomization helps uncover potential therapeutic targets; and marginal structural models enhance the accuracy of causal effect estimation in clinical studies. The future integration of various data sources to improve causal inference methods is anticipated to enhance the sensitivity and specificity of trials, ultimately elucidating the complex mechanisms of diseases and drug effects. The literature retrieve strategy and the metrics of the tools adopted may have a certain impact on the results of this study.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare (JMDH) aims to represent and publish research in healthcare areas delivered by practitioners of different disciplines. This includes studies and reviews conducted by multidisciplinary teams as well as research which evaluates or reports the results or conduct of such teams or healthcare processes in general. The journal covers a very wide range of areas and we welcome submissions from practitioners at all levels and from all over the world. Good healthcare is not bounded by person, place or time and the journal aims to reflect this. The JMDH is published as an open-access journal to allow this wide range of practical, patient relevant research to be immediately available to practitioners who can access and use it immediately upon publication.