鼓室成形术与咽鼓管球囊扩张治疗慢性炎症性中耳疾病:一项随机临床试验。

IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Alexandra Gey, Clemens Honeder, Julia Reiber, Robert Honigmann, Jonas Zirkler, Andreas Wienke, Torsten Rahne, Stefan K Plontke
{"title":"鼓室成形术与咽鼓管球囊扩张治疗慢性炎症性中耳疾病:一项随机临床试验。","authors":"Alexandra Gey, Clemens Honeder, Julia Reiber, Robert Honigmann, Jonas Zirkler, Andreas Wienke, Torsten Rahne, Stefan K Plontke","doi":"10.1001/jamaoto.2025.0904","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Eustachian tube balloon dilation (ETBD) is increasingly used to treat Eustachian tube (ET) dysfunction, but its benefit in patients requiring tympanoplasty for chronic inflammatory middle ear disease is unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy of additional ETBD on the Eustachian Tube Score (ETS), hearing outcomes, and subjective ET function in patients with obstructive ET dysfunction undergoing tympanoplasty.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This parallel-group, single-blind, monocentric, randomized clinical trial included patients with chronic inflammatory middle ear disease and ET dysfunction seen at a tertiary referral center and scheduled for tympanoplasty between January 2015 and November 2019. Data were analyzed between June 2022 and December 2023.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Patients were randomized to tympanoplasty only or an additional ETBD of the affected side.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The main outcome was the change in ETS, and secondary outcome measures were change in the air-bone gap (ABG) and Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire (ETDQ-7) scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 76 randomized participants, 68 were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. Of the 34 patients in the tympanoplasty group, 20 participants (59%) were female, and the mean (SD) age was 53.4 (12.5) years. Of the 34 patients in the tympanoplasty plus ETBD group, 13 participants (38%) were female, and the mean (SD) age was 51.4 (14.5) years. During the first 12 months after the procedure, the difference in mean ETS changes between the tympanoplasty (1.62 [95% CI, 0.66-2.59]) and the tympanoplasty plus ETBD group (1.41 [95% CI, 0.43-2.39]) was 0.21 (95% CI, -1.17 to 1.59). These results rule out the possibility of a clinically meaningful difference of 3 points or more in ETS. Twelve months after the procedure, ABG improved from 26.1 dB to 19.0 dB hearing loss in the tympanoplasty group and from 30.1 dB to 20.1 dB hearing loss in the tympanoplasty plus ETBD group. The difference in ABG changes between the groups was -2.8 dB (95% CI, -9.1 dB to 3.5 dB), and the difference in mean ETDQ-7 changes was -0.2 (95% CI, -3.4 to 3.1).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this randomized clinical trial, the addition of ETBD to tympanoplasty in patients with chronic inflammatory middle ear disease and ET dysfunction did not improve the outcome regarding ETS, ABG, or subjective long-term ET function. ETBD should, therefore, not be routinely performed as an add-on procedure to tympanoplasty for this indication. Larger multicentric randomized trials could provide more insights into the efficacy of ETBD in patients with chronic inflammatory middle ear disease undergoing tympanoplasty and would allow for specific subgroup analyses.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>German Clinical Trials Register Identifier: DRKS00031807.</p>","PeriodicalId":14632,"journal":{"name":"JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12082485/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tympanoplasty With Eustachian Tube Balloon Dilation for Chronic Inflammatory Middle Ear Disease: A Randomized Clinical Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Alexandra Gey, Clemens Honeder, Julia Reiber, Robert Honigmann, Jonas Zirkler, Andreas Wienke, Torsten Rahne, Stefan K Plontke\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/jamaoto.2025.0904\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Eustachian tube balloon dilation (ETBD) is increasingly used to treat Eustachian tube (ET) dysfunction, but its benefit in patients requiring tympanoplasty for chronic inflammatory middle ear disease is unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy of additional ETBD on the Eustachian Tube Score (ETS), hearing outcomes, and subjective ET function in patients with obstructive ET dysfunction undergoing tympanoplasty.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This parallel-group, single-blind, monocentric, randomized clinical trial included patients with chronic inflammatory middle ear disease and ET dysfunction seen at a tertiary referral center and scheduled for tympanoplasty between January 2015 and November 2019. Data were analyzed between June 2022 and December 2023.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Patients were randomized to tympanoplasty only or an additional ETBD of the affected side.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The main outcome was the change in ETS, and secondary outcome measures were change in the air-bone gap (ABG) and Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire (ETDQ-7) scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 76 randomized participants, 68 were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. Of the 34 patients in the tympanoplasty group, 20 participants (59%) were female, and the mean (SD) age was 53.4 (12.5) years. Of the 34 patients in the tympanoplasty plus ETBD group, 13 participants (38%) were female, and the mean (SD) age was 51.4 (14.5) years. During the first 12 months after the procedure, the difference in mean ETS changes between the tympanoplasty (1.62 [95% CI, 0.66-2.59]) and the tympanoplasty plus ETBD group (1.41 [95% CI, 0.43-2.39]) was 0.21 (95% CI, -1.17 to 1.59). These results rule out the possibility of a clinically meaningful difference of 3 points or more in ETS. Twelve months after the procedure, ABG improved from 26.1 dB to 19.0 dB hearing loss in the tympanoplasty group and from 30.1 dB to 20.1 dB hearing loss in the tympanoplasty plus ETBD group. The difference in ABG changes between the groups was -2.8 dB (95% CI, -9.1 dB to 3.5 dB), and the difference in mean ETDQ-7 changes was -0.2 (95% CI, -3.4 to 3.1).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this randomized clinical trial, the addition of ETBD to tympanoplasty in patients with chronic inflammatory middle ear disease and ET dysfunction did not improve the outcome regarding ETS, ABG, or subjective long-term ET function. ETBD should, therefore, not be routinely performed as an add-on procedure to tympanoplasty for this indication. Larger multicentric randomized trials could provide more insights into the efficacy of ETBD in patients with chronic inflammatory middle ear disease undergoing tympanoplasty and would allow for specific subgroup analyses.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>German Clinical Trials Register Identifier: DRKS00031807.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14632,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12082485/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoto.2025.0904\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoto.2025.0904","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重要性:耳咽管球囊扩张(ETBD)越来越多地用于治疗耳咽管功能障碍,但其对慢性炎症性中耳疾病需要鼓室成形术的患者的益处尚不清楚。目的:评价附加ETBD对行鼓室成形术的阻塞性ET功能障碍患者的咽鼓管评分(ETS)、听力结局和主观ET功能的影响。设计、环境和参与者:这项平行组、单盲、单中心、随机临床试验纳入了2015年1月至2019年11月在三级转诊中心就诊并计划行鼓室成形术的慢性炎症性中耳疾病和ET功能障碍患者。数据分析时间为2022年6月至2023年12月。干预:患者随机分为两组,一组只接受鼓室成形术,另一组接受患侧ETBD。主要结局和测量指标:主要结局指标为ETS的变化,次要结局指标为气骨间隙(ABG)和咽鼓管功能障碍问卷(ETDQ-7)评分的变化。结果:76名随机受试者中,68名纳入意向治疗分析。鼓室成形术组34例患者中,20例(59%)为女性,平均(SD)年龄为53.4(12.5)岁。在鼓室成形术加ETBD组的34例患者中,13例(38%)为女性,平均(SD)年龄为51.4(14.5)岁。在手术后的前12个月,鼓室成形术组(1.62 [95% CI, 0.66-2.59])和鼓室成形术加ETBD组(1.41 [95% CI, 0.43-2.39])的平均ETS变化差异为0.21 (95% CI, -1.17至1.59)。这些结果排除了ETS存在3分或以上临床意义差异的可能性。手术后12个月,鼓室成形术组的ABG听力损失从26.1 dB改善到19.0 dB,鼓室成形术加ETBD组的听力损失从30.1 dB改善到20.1 dB。两组间ABG变化差异为-2.8 dB (95% CI, -9.1 dB ~ 3.5 dB), ETDQ-7平均变化差异为-0.2 (95% CI, -3.4 ~ 3.1)。结论和相关性:在这项随机临床试验中,慢性炎症性中耳疾病和ET功能障碍患者在鼓室成形术中加入ETBD并没有改善ETS、ABG或主观长期ET功能的结果。因此,对于这一适应症,ETBD不应常规作为鼓室成形术的附加手术。更大的多中心随机试验可以提供更多关于慢性炎症性中耳疾病患者接受鼓室成形术的疗效,并允许进行特定亚组分析。试验注册:德国临床试验注册标识符:DRKS00031807。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tympanoplasty With Eustachian Tube Balloon Dilation for Chronic Inflammatory Middle Ear Disease: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Eustachian tube balloon dilation (ETBD) is increasingly used to treat Eustachian tube (ET) dysfunction, but its benefit in patients requiring tympanoplasty for chronic inflammatory middle ear disease is unclear.

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of additional ETBD on the Eustachian Tube Score (ETS), hearing outcomes, and subjective ET function in patients with obstructive ET dysfunction undergoing tympanoplasty.

Design, setting, and participants: This parallel-group, single-blind, monocentric, randomized clinical trial included patients with chronic inflammatory middle ear disease and ET dysfunction seen at a tertiary referral center and scheduled for tympanoplasty between January 2015 and November 2019. Data were analyzed between June 2022 and December 2023.

Intervention: Patients were randomized to tympanoplasty only or an additional ETBD of the affected side.

Main outcomes and measures: The main outcome was the change in ETS, and secondary outcome measures were change in the air-bone gap (ABG) and Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire (ETDQ-7) scores.

Results: From 76 randomized participants, 68 were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. Of the 34 patients in the tympanoplasty group, 20 participants (59%) were female, and the mean (SD) age was 53.4 (12.5) years. Of the 34 patients in the tympanoplasty plus ETBD group, 13 participants (38%) were female, and the mean (SD) age was 51.4 (14.5) years. During the first 12 months after the procedure, the difference in mean ETS changes between the tympanoplasty (1.62 [95% CI, 0.66-2.59]) and the tympanoplasty plus ETBD group (1.41 [95% CI, 0.43-2.39]) was 0.21 (95% CI, -1.17 to 1.59). These results rule out the possibility of a clinically meaningful difference of 3 points or more in ETS. Twelve months after the procedure, ABG improved from 26.1 dB to 19.0 dB hearing loss in the tympanoplasty group and from 30.1 dB to 20.1 dB hearing loss in the tympanoplasty plus ETBD group. The difference in ABG changes between the groups was -2.8 dB (95% CI, -9.1 dB to 3.5 dB), and the difference in mean ETDQ-7 changes was -0.2 (95% CI, -3.4 to 3.1).

Conclusions and relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, the addition of ETBD to tympanoplasty in patients with chronic inflammatory middle ear disease and ET dysfunction did not improve the outcome regarding ETS, ABG, or subjective long-term ET function. ETBD should, therefore, not be routinely performed as an add-on procedure to tympanoplasty for this indication. Larger multicentric randomized trials could provide more insights into the efficacy of ETBD in patients with chronic inflammatory middle ear disease undergoing tympanoplasty and would allow for specific subgroup analyses.

Trial registration: German Clinical Trials Register Identifier: DRKS00031807.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
5.10%
发文量
230
期刊介绍: JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery is a globally recognized and peer-reviewed medical journal dedicated to providing up-to-date information on diseases affecting the head and neck. It originated in 1925 as Archives of Otolaryngology and currently serves as the official publication for the American Head and Neck Society. As part of the prestigious JAMA Network, a collection of reputable general medical and specialty publications, it ensures the highest standards of research and expertise. Physicians and scientists worldwide rely on JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery for invaluable insights in this specialized field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信