一项评价纳曲酮与阿坎普罗酸作为抗酒精使用障碍药物疗效的比较研究。

Industrial Psychiatry Journal Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-18 DOI:10.4103/ipj.ipj_413_24
Samant Singh, Lakhan Kataria, Mohd Rashid Alam
{"title":"一项评价纳曲酮与阿坎普罗酸作为抗酒精使用障碍药物疗效的比较研究。","authors":"Samant Singh, Lakhan Kataria, Mohd Rashid Alam","doi":"10.4103/ipj.ipj_413_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Alcohol use disorders (AUDs) are characterized by excessive alcohol consumption, negatively impacting health, social life, and economic status. Globally, AUD contributes to significant disease burden, causing millions deaths annually. Despite the availability of treatments, relapse rates remain high. Naltrexone and acamprosate, two FDA-approved anticraving agents, are widely used to prevent relapse. However, comparative studies in Indian populations are limited, prompting this study to assess the efficacy of these drugs in treating AUD.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of naltrexone and acamprosate as anticraving agents in treating AUD, evaluating the time to first drink (lapse) and time to relapse among patients using either medication at 1 and 3 months. It also assessed the correlation between baseline severity of AUD and the efficacy of naltrexone and acamprosate as anticraving agents, as well as compared demographic and clinical variables between the two treatment groups.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A prospective observational study was conducted on 70 patients diagnosed with AUD, divided into two groups: naltrexone (n = 35) and acamprosate (n = 35). Patients were assessed using the Obsessive Compulsive Drinking Scale (OCDS) and followed for 3 months to evaluate craving intensity, time to first drink, and relapse rates. The Quality of Life Scale (QOLS) and Clinical Global Impression (CGI) were used to assess treatment impact.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups were comparable at baseline. At 3 months, naltrexone patients had higher abstinence rates (63.64%) compared with acamprosate (34.68%, <i>P</i> = 0.018). Naltrexone also significantly extended the time to first drink and relapse compared to acamprosate.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Naltrexone demonstrated superior efficacy in maintaining abstinence and reducing relapse rates in AUD patients compared to acamprosate. These findings suggest that naltrexone may be more effective for long-term treatment in the Indian context.</p>","PeriodicalId":13534,"journal":{"name":"Industrial Psychiatry Journal","volume":"34 1","pages":"97-102"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12077622/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative study evaluating the efficacy of naltrexone versus acamprosate as anticraving agents in alcohol use disorder.\",\"authors\":\"Samant Singh, Lakhan Kataria, Mohd Rashid Alam\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ipj.ipj_413_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Alcohol use disorders (AUDs) are characterized by excessive alcohol consumption, negatively impacting health, social life, and economic status. Globally, AUD contributes to significant disease burden, causing millions deaths annually. Despite the availability of treatments, relapse rates remain high. Naltrexone and acamprosate, two FDA-approved anticraving agents, are widely used to prevent relapse. However, comparative studies in Indian populations are limited, prompting this study to assess the efficacy of these drugs in treating AUD.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of naltrexone and acamprosate as anticraving agents in treating AUD, evaluating the time to first drink (lapse) and time to relapse among patients using either medication at 1 and 3 months. It also assessed the correlation between baseline severity of AUD and the efficacy of naltrexone and acamprosate as anticraving agents, as well as compared demographic and clinical variables between the two treatment groups.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A prospective observational study was conducted on 70 patients diagnosed with AUD, divided into two groups: naltrexone (n = 35) and acamprosate (n = 35). Patients were assessed using the Obsessive Compulsive Drinking Scale (OCDS) and followed for 3 months to evaluate craving intensity, time to first drink, and relapse rates. The Quality of Life Scale (QOLS) and Clinical Global Impression (CGI) were used to assess treatment impact.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups were comparable at baseline. At 3 months, naltrexone patients had higher abstinence rates (63.64%) compared with acamprosate (34.68%, <i>P</i> = 0.018). Naltrexone also significantly extended the time to first drink and relapse compared to acamprosate.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Naltrexone demonstrated superior efficacy in maintaining abstinence and reducing relapse rates in AUD patients compared to acamprosate. These findings suggest that naltrexone may be more effective for long-term treatment in the Indian context.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13534,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Industrial Psychiatry Journal\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"97-102\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12077622/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Industrial Psychiatry Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ipj.ipj_413_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Industrial Psychiatry Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ipj.ipj_413_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:酒精使用障碍(AUDs)以过度饮酒为特征,对健康、社会生活和经济地位产生负面影响。在全球范围内,AUD造成了巨大的疾病负担,每年造成数百万人死亡。尽管有治疗方法,复发率仍然很高。纳曲酮和阿坎普罗酸是两种fda批准的抗食欲药,被广泛用于预防复发。然而,在印度人群中的比较研究有限,这促使本研究评估这些药物治疗AUD的疗效。目的:本研究旨在比较纳曲酮和阿坎普罗酸作为抗渴望药物治疗AUD的有效性,评估使用任何一种药物的患者在1个月和3个月的首次饮酒时间(失效)和复发时间。该研究还评估了AUD的基线严重程度与纳曲酮和阿坎前列酯作为抗渴望药物的疗效之间的相关性,并比较了两组治疗之间的人口学和临床变量。材料与方法:对70例诊断为AUD的患者进行前瞻性观察研究,分为纳曲酮组(n = 35)和阿坎前列酯组(n = 35)。采用强迫饮酒量表(OCDS)对患者进行评估,并随访3个月,评估渴望强度、首次饮酒时间和复发率。采用生活质量量表(QOLS)和临床总体印象(CGI)评估治疗效果。结果:两组在基线时具有可比性。3个月时,纳曲酮患者戒断率(63.64%)高于阿坎前列酯(34.68%,P = 0.018)。与阿坎普罗酸相比,纳曲酮也显著延长了首次饮酒和复发的时间。结论:纳曲酮在维持AUD患者戒断和降低复发率方面的疗效优于阿坎前列酯。这些发现表明纳曲酮在印度的长期治疗中可能更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparative study evaluating the efficacy of naltrexone versus acamprosate as anticraving agents in alcohol use disorder.

Background: Alcohol use disorders (AUDs) are characterized by excessive alcohol consumption, negatively impacting health, social life, and economic status. Globally, AUD contributes to significant disease burden, causing millions deaths annually. Despite the availability of treatments, relapse rates remain high. Naltrexone and acamprosate, two FDA-approved anticraving agents, are widely used to prevent relapse. However, comparative studies in Indian populations are limited, prompting this study to assess the efficacy of these drugs in treating AUD.

Aim: This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of naltrexone and acamprosate as anticraving agents in treating AUD, evaluating the time to first drink (lapse) and time to relapse among patients using either medication at 1 and 3 months. It also assessed the correlation between baseline severity of AUD and the efficacy of naltrexone and acamprosate as anticraving agents, as well as compared demographic and clinical variables between the two treatment groups.

Materials and methods: A prospective observational study was conducted on 70 patients diagnosed with AUD, divided into two groups: naltrexone (n = 35) and acamprosate (n = 35). Patients were assessed using the Obsessive Compulsive Drinking Scale (OCDS) and followed for 3 months to evaluate craving intensity, time to first drink, and relapse rates. The Quality of Life Scale (QOLS) and Clinical Global Impression (CGI) were used to assess treatment impact.

Results: Both groups were comparable at baseline. At 3 months, naltrexone patients had higher abstinence rates (63.64%) compared with acamprosate (34.68%, P = 0.018). Naltrexone also significantly extended the time to first drink and relapse compared to acamprosate.

Conclusion: Naltrexone demonstrated superior efficacy in maintaining abstinence and reducing relapse rates in AUD patients compared to acamprosate. These findings suggest that naltrexone may be more effective for long-term treatment in the Indian context.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
39 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信