可计算放射治疗表型的发展和验证。

IF 6.4 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Cecelia J Madison, Julie A Lynch, Scott L Duvall, Patrick R Alba, Elizabeth Hanchrow, Fatai Y Agiri, Kathryn M Pridgen, Ryan J Burri, Reid F Thompson, Maria Kelly, Evangelia Katsoulakis
{"title":"可计算放射治疗表型的发展和验证。","authors":"Cecelia J Madison, Julie A Lynch, Scott L Duvall, Patrick R Alba, Elizabeth Hanchrow, Fatai Y Agiri, Kathryn M Pridgen, Ryan J Burri, Reid F Thompson, Maria Kelly, Evangelia Katsoulakis","doi":"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2025.05.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aims to develop a robust methodology using structured and semi-structured health data to identify patients who have undergone radiation therapy, thereby facilitating future research on treatment outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective cohort study, we identified Veterans receiving radiation oncology care through documentation of referrals, encounters, and billing codes from 2014 through 2023. We classified administrative codes based on process of care and type of radiation received, and then analyzed utilization patterns. Unstructured data analysis was performed using keyword search of relevant clinical notes in the metadata fields and categorizing those notes by radiation oncology processes. To validate our algorithm, we compared the cohort we developed using existing data sources to a cohort that was chart reviewed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final cohort included 589,318 Veterans with radiation oncology care. Among these, 355,276 had codes indicating radiotherapy delivery. The most common treatments were image guided (IGRT), three-dimensional conformal (3DCRT), intensity-modulated (IMRT), and stereotactic radiosurgery/stereotactic body (SRS/SBRT). Anatomy-specific billing codes were underutilized. Clinical note analysis identified 1,341 unique labels for radiation oncology content, with 947,928 notes found for 204,064 patients. Validation against chart-reviewed datasets showed strong concordance and confirmed the accuracy of our algorithm in identifying radiation oncology care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Automated extraction of medical records can be used to identify cohorts of patients who have undergone radiotherapy. Employing this algorithm may facilitate more precise phenotyping of radiotherapy cases and thus significantly enhance our understanding of these cohorts.</p>","PeriodicalId":14215,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and Validation of a Computable Radiotherapy Phenotype.\",\"authors\":\"Cecelia J Madison, Julie A Lynch, Scott L Duvall, Patrick R Alba, Elizabeth Hanchrow, Fatai Y Agiri, Kathryn M Pridgen, Ryan J Burri, Reid F Thompson, Maria Kelly, Evangelia Katsoulakis\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2025.05.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aims to develop a robust methodology using structured and semi-structured health data to identify patients who have undergone radiation therapy, thereby facilitating future research on treatment outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective cohort study, we identified Veterans receiving radiation oncology care through documentation of referrals, encounters, and billing codes from 2014 through 2023. We classified administrative codes based on process of care and type of radiation received, and then analyzed utilization patterns. Unstructured data analysis was performed using keyword search of relevant clinical notes in the metadata fields and categorizing those notes by radiation oncology processes. To validate our algorithm, we compared the cohort we developed using existing data sources to a cohort that was chart reviewed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final cohort included 589,318 Veterans with radiation oncology care. Among these, 355,276 had codes indicating radiotherapy delivery. The most common treatments were image guided (IGRT), three-dimensional conformal (3DCRT), intensity-modulated (IMRT), and stereotactic radiosurgery/stereotactic body (SRS/SBRT). Anatomy-specific billing codes were underutilized. Clinical note analysis identified 1,341 unique labels for radiation oncology content, with 947,928 notes found for 204,064 patients. Validation against chart-reviewed datasets showed strong concordance and confirmed the accuracy of our algorithm in identifying radiation oncology care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Automated extraction of medical records can be used to identify cohorts of patients who have undergone radiotherapy. Employing this algorithm may facilitate more precise phenotyping of radiotherapy cases and thus significantly enhance our understanding of these cohorts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14215,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2025.05.001\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2025.05.001","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究旨在开发一种使用结构化和半结构化健康数据的可靠方法来识别接受放射治疗的患者,从而促进未来对治疗结果的研究。方法:在这项回顾性队列研究中,我们通过2014年至2023年的转诊记录、就诊记录和账单代码确定了接受放射肿瘤学治疗的退伍军人。根据护理过程和所受辐射类型对行政代码进行分类,并分析其利用模式。对元数据字段中的相关临床笔记进行关键词搜索,并按放射肿瘤学流程对这些笔记进行分类,进行非结构化数据分析。为了验证我们的算法,我们将使用现有数据源开发的队列与经过图表审查的队列进行了比较。结果:最终队列包括589,318名接受放射肿瘤学治疗的退伍军人。其中,355,276份有指示放射治疗递送的代码。最常见的治疗方法是图像引导(IGRT)、三维适形(3DCRT)、调强(IMRT)和立体定向放射手术/立体定向体(SRS/SBRT)。解剖学特有的账单代码没有得到充分利用。临床记录分析确定了1,341个放射肿瘤学内容的独特标签,其中947,928个记录来自204,064名患者。对图表回顾数据集的验证显示了很强的一致性,并证实了我们的算法在识别放射肿瘤学护理方面的准确性。结论:病历自动提取可用于确定放疗患者队列。采用该算法可能有助于更精确的放射治疗病例表型,从而显著提高我们对这些队列的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development and Validation of a Computable Radiotherapy Phenotype.

Background: This study aims to develop a robust methodology using structured and semi-structured health data to identify patients who have undergone radiation therapy, thereby facilitating future research on treatment outcomes.

Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we identified Veterans receiving radiation oncology care through documentation of referrals, encounters, and billing codes from 2014 through 2023. We classified administrative codes based on process of care and type of radiation received, and then analyzed utilization patterns. Unstructured data analysis was performed using keyword search of relevant clinical notes in the metadata fields and categorizing those notes by radiation oncology processes. To validate our algorithm, we compared the cohort we developed using existing data sources to a cohort that was chart reviewed.

Results: The final cohort included 589,318 Veterans with radiation oncology care. Among these, 355,276 had codes indicating radiotherapy delivery. The most common treatments were image guided (IGRT), three-dimensional conformal (3DCRT), intensity-modulated (IMRT), and stereotactic radiosurgery/stereotactic body (SRS/SBRT). Anatomy-specific billing codes were underutilized. Clinical note analysis identified 1,341 unique labels for radiation oncology content, with 947,928 notes found for 204,064 patients. Validation against chart-reviewed datasets showed strong concordance and confirmed the accuracy of our algorithm in identifying radiation oncology care.

Conclusion: Automated extraction of medical records can be used to identify cohorts of patients who have undergone radiotherapy. Employing this algorithm may facilitate more precise phenotyping of radiotherapy cases and thus significantly enhance our understanding of these cohorts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
2538
审稿时长
6.6 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Radiation Oncology • Biology • Physics (IJROBP), known in the field as the Red Journal, publishes original laboratory and clinical investigations related to radiation oncology, radiation biology, medical physics, and both education and health policy as it relates to the field. This journal has a particular interest in original contributions of the following types: prospective clinical trials, outcomes research, and large database interrogation. In addition, it seeks reports of high-impact innovations in single or combined modality treatment, tumor sensitization, normal tissue protection (including both precision avoidance and pharmacologic means), brachytherapy, particle irradiation, and cancer imaging. Technical advances related to dosimetry and conformal radiation treatment planning are of interest, as are basic science studies investigating tumor physiology and the molecular biology underlying cancer and normal tissue radiation response.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信