脚踝外骨骼在不规则地形上的性能:关键设计原则和基准测试。

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
L Liguori, G Mariani, J Taborri, I Mileti, D Torricelli, L Mattioli, E Palermo, F Patane, S Rossi
{"title":"脚踝外骨骼在不规则地形上的性能:关键设计原则和基准测试。","authors":"L Liguori, G Mariani, J Taborri, I Mileti, D Torricelli, L Mattioli, E Palermo, F Patane, S Rossi","doi":"10.1109/TNSRE.2025.3569959","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Exoskeletons offer an advanced solution for assisting and rehabilitating physically impaired people. The mechanical design of these devices can significantly affect the kinematics of the user by restricting limb movements. In this study, we present the mechanical design of two new prototypes of ankle exoskeleton with a different number of degrees-of-freedom (DoF) and different torque transmission method. Specifically, the first prototype (S-RANK) accommodates a single DoF in the sagittal plane, whereas the second prototype (M-RANK) extends the functionality to include ankle inversion/eversion and internal/external rotation. To assess the impact of the mechanical design of the exoskeletons on the kinematics of the lower limb, the two devices were donned on the right leg by two healthy subjects and tested on five different terrains. Human kinematics of the left and right lower limbs were collected using inertial measurement units (IMUs). The study assessed the effects on trend symmetry (TS) between the left and right limb kinematic parameters and used statistical parametric mapping (SPM) to compare joint angle curves with and without each prototype. The findings indicated that both prototypes exerted a notable influence on joint kinematics. The S-RANK resulted in a higher overall difference (OD), particularly at the ankle joint across all terrains except during downhill walking, with the largest deviations observed on softer surfaces. In contrast, M-RANK had a less pronounced effect on ankle kinematics but generally performed worse on the knee and hip joints. In these instances, it led to higher OD when walking on flat and softer surfaces. The two exoskeleton prototypes affected gait symmetry on all terrains, with S-RANK leading to a significant worsening on flat terrain. The findings indicate that while S-RANK offered stability and a less pronounced effect on proximal joint kinematics, M-RANK's additional degrees of freedom provided superior adaptability and maintenance of natural gait patterns.</p>","PeriodicalId":13419,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering","volume":"PP ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance of Ankle Exoskeletons on Irregular Terrains: Key Design Principles and Benchmarking Tests.\",\"authors\":\"L Liguori, G Mariani, J Taborri, I Mileti, D Torricelli, L Mattioli, E Palermo, F Patane, S Rossi\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TNSRE.2025.3569959\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Exoskeletons offer an advanced solution for assisting and rehabilitating physically impaired people. The mechanical design of these devices can significantly affect the kinematics of the user by restricting limb movements. In this study, we present the mechanical design of two new prototypes of ankle exoskeleton with a different number of degrees-of-freedom (DoF) and different torque transmission method. Specifically, the first prototype (S-RANK) accommodates a single DoF in the sagittal plane, whereas the second prototype (M-RANK) extends the functionality to include ankle inversion/eversion and internal/external rotation. To assess the impact of the mechanical design of the exoskeletons on the kinematics of the lower limb, the two devices were donned on the right leg by two healthy subjects and tested on five different terrains. Human kinematics of the left and right lower limbs were collected using inertial measurement units (IMUs). The study assessed the effects on trend symmetry (TS) between the left and right limb kinematic parameters and used statistical parametric mapping (SPM) to compare joint angle curves with and without each prototype. The findings indicated that both prototypes exerted a notable influence on joint kinematics. The S-RANK resulted in a higher overall difference (OD), particularly at the ankle joint across all terrains except during downhill walking, with the largest deviations observed on softer surfaces. In contrast, M-RANK had a less pronounced effect on ankle kinematics but generally performed worse on the knee and hip joints. In these instances, it led to higher OD when walking on flat and softer surfaces. The two exoskeleton prototypes affected gait symmetry on all terrains, with S-RANK leading to a significant worsening on flat terrain. The findings indicate that while S-RANK offered stability and a less pronounced effect on proximal joint kinematics, M-RANK's additional degrees of freedom provided superior adaptability and maintenance of natural gait patterns.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13419,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering\",\"volume\":\"PP \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2025.3569959\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2025.3569959","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

外骨骼提供了一个先进的解决方案,以帮助和恢复身体受损的人。这些装置的机械设计会通过限制肢体运动而显著影响使用者的运动学。在这项研究中,我们提出了两种具有不同自由度和不同扭矩传递方式的新型踝关节外骨骼原型的机械设计。具体来说,第一个原型(S-RANK)在矢状面容纳单个自由度,而第二个原型(M-RANK)扩展了功能,包括踝关节内翻/外翻和内/外旋转。为了评估外骨骼的机械设计对下肢运动学的影响,两名健康受试者将这两种装置戴在右腿上,并在五种不同的地形上进行了测试。采用惯性测量单元(imu)采集左、右下肢的人体运动学。该研究评估了左右肢体运动学参数对趋势对称性(TS)的影响,并使用统计参数映射(SPM)比较了有和没有每个原型的关节角曲线。结果表明,两种原型对关节运动学都有显著的影响。S-RANK导致更高的总体差异(OD),特别是在除下坡行走外的所有地形的踝关节处,在较软的表面上观察到最大的偏差。相比之下,M-RANK对踝关节运动的影响不太明显,但对膝关节和髋关节的影响通常更差。在这些情况下,当在平坦和柔软的表面上行走时,它会导致更高的OD。两个外骨骼原型在所有地形上都影响步态对称性,S-RANK导致平坦地形上的显着恶化。研究结果表明,虽然S-RANK提供了稳定性,对近端关节运动学的影响不太明显,但M-RANK的额外自由度提供了优越的适应性和对自然步态模式的维护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance of Ankle Exoskeletons on Irregular Terrains: Key Design Principles and Benchmarking Tests.

Exoskeletons offer an advanced solution for assisting and rehabilitating physically impaired people. The mechanical design of these devices can significantly affect the kinematics of the user by restricting limb movements. In this study, we present the mechanical design of two new prototypes of ankle exoskeleton with a different number of degrees-of-freedom (DoF) and different torque transmission method. Specifically, the first prototype (S-RANK) accommodates a single DoF in the sagittal plane, whereas the second prototype (M-RANK) extends the functionality to include ankle inversion/eversion and internal/external rotation. To assess the impact of the mechanical design of the exoskeletons on the kinematics of the lower limb, the two devices were donned on the right leg by two healthy subjects and tested on five different terrains. Human kinematics of the left and right lower limbs were collected using inertial measurement units (IMUs). The study assessed the effects on trend symmetry (TS) between the left and right limb kinematic parameters and used statistical parametric mapping (SPM) to compare joint angle curves with and without each prototype. The findings indicated that both prototypes exerted a notable influence on joint kinematics. The S-RANK resulted in a higher overall difference (OD), particularly at the ankle joint across all terrains except during downhill walking, with the largest deviations observed on softer surfaces. In contrast, M-RANK had a less pronounced effect on ankle kinematics but generally performed worse on the knee and hip joints. In these instances, it led to higher OD when walking on flat and softer surfaces. The two exoskeleton prototypes affected gait symmetry on all terrains, with S-RANK leading to a significant worsening on flat terrain. The findings indicate that while S-RANK offered stability and a less pronounced effect on proximal joint kinematics, M-RANK's additional degrees of freedom provided superior adaptability and maintenance of natural gait patterns.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
8.20%
发文量
479
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Rehabilitative and neural aspects of biomedical engineering, including functional electrical stimulation, acoustic dynamics, human performance measurement and analysis, nerve stimulation, electromyography, motor control and stimulation; and hardware and software applications for rehabilitation engineering and assistive devices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信