未准备好:医疗应急准备培训标准的需要。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Patrina White, Florence Di Benedetto, Keith Hansen, Sharon Medcalf, Rachel Lookadoo
{"title":"未准备好:医疗应急准备培训标准的需要。","authors":"Patrina White, Florence Di Benedetto, Keith Hansen, Sharon Medcalf, Rachel Lookadoo","doi":"10.1089/hs.2024.0086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Natural and human-induced disasters are increasing, which affects public health and safety in many ways including disruption of healthcare. Emergency preparedness mitigates the impacts of these disasters and training improves preparedness. However, no standard for training emergency managers exists. This study aimed to explore the state of US healthcare preparedness and the impact of training on preparedness and proposes a training standard for healthcare emergency managers. Mixed methods research was conducted to understand different aspects of training, inform the design of a training standard, and explore potential barriers. The first phase included a quantitative survey with 67 participants who responded to questions about training topics, quantity, and delivery format. In the second qualitative phase, 5 focus groups with 29 participants were conducted to deepen the understanding of survey results and collect information about training topics, barriers to adopting a standard, and recommendations for overcoming barriers. Ten training topics, for a quantity of 11 hours or more per topic, were identified in the quantitative phase and reinforced in the qualitative phase. In-person training was preferred for all but 3 topics, where online synchronous delivery was preferred. Other aspects of training were further explored, and the concept of a basic versus advanced training standard emerged as a major theme. Barriers to training included financial support and time to attend training as well as gaps in leadership knowledge and support. While training is key to improved healthcare emergency preparedness, variation in training exists. This study recommends a standard in healthcare emergency manager training.</p>","PeriodicalId":12955,"journal":{"name":"Health Security","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Not Ready: The Need for a Training Standard in Healthcare Emergency Preparedness.\",\"authors\":\"Patrina White, Florence Di Benedetto, Keith Hansen, Sharon Medcalf, Rachel Lookadoo\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/hs.2024.0086\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Natural and human-induced disasters are increasing, which affects public health and safety in many ways including disruption of healthcare. Emergency preparedness mitigates the impacts of these disasters and training improves preparedness. However, no standard for training emergency managers exists. This study aimed to explore the state of US healthcare preparedness and the impact of training on preparedness and proposes a training standard for healthcare emergency managers. Mixed methods research was conducted to understand different aspects of training, inform the design of a training standard, and explore potential barriers. The first phase included a quantitative survey with 67 participants who responded to questions about training topics, quantity, and delivery format. In the second qualitative phase, 5 focus groups with 29 participants were conducted to deepen the understanding of survey results and collect information about training topics, barriers to adopting a standard, and recommendations for overcoming barriers. Ten training topics, for a quantity of 11 hours or more per topic, were identified in the quantitative phase and reinforced in the qualitative phase. In-person training was preferred for all but 3 topics, where online synchronous delivery was preferred. Other aspects of training were further explored, and the concept of a basic versus advanced training standard emerged as a major theme. Barriers to training included financial support and time to attend training as well as gaps in leadership knowledge and support. While training is key to improved healthcare emergency preparedness, variation in training exists. This study recommends a standard in healthcare emergency manager training.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12955,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Security\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Security\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/hs.2024.0086\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Security","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/hs.2024.0086","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自然灾害和人为灾害正在增加,这在许多方面影响到公共健康和安全,包括扰乱医疗保健。应急准备可以减轻这些灾害的影响,培训可以改善备灾工作。但是,目前还没有培训应急管理人员的标准。本研究旨在探讨美国医疗准备状况和培训对准备的影响,并提出医疗应急管理人员的培训标准。进行混合方法研究是为了了解培训的不同方面,为培训标准的设计提供信息,并探索潜在的障碍。第一阶段包括对67名参与者的定量调查,他们回答了有关培训主题、数量和交付形式的问题。在第二个定性阶段,进行了5个焦点小组,共有29名参与者,以加深对调查结果的理解,并收集有关培训主题、采用标准的障碍以及克服障碍的建议的信息。在定量阶段确定了10个培训主题,每个主题的数量为11小时或更长时间,并在定性阶段加强。除了3个主题外,所有主题都首选现场培训,其中在线同步交付更可取。培训的其他方面得到进一步探讨,基本培训标准与高级培训标准的概念成为一个主要主题。培训的障碍包括财政支持和参加培训的时间,以及领导力知识和支持方面的差距。虽然培训是改善医疗应急准备的关键,但培训存在差异。本研究建议在医疗应急管理人员的培训标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Not Ready: The Need for a Training Standard in Healthcare Emergency Preparedness.

Natural and human-induced disasters are increasing, which affects public health and safety in many ways including disruption of healthcare. Emergency preparedness mitigates the impacts of these disasters and training improves preparedness. However, no standard for training emergency managers exists. This study aimed to explore the state of US healthcare preparedness and the impact of training on preparedness and proposes a training standard for healthcare emergency managers. Mixed methods research was conducted to understand different aspects of training, inform the design of a training standard, and explore potential barriers. The first phase included a quantitative survey with 67 participants who responded to questions about training topics, quantity, and delivery format. In the second qualitative phase, 5 focus groups with 29 participants were conducted to deepen the understanding of survey results and collect information about training topics, barriers to adopting a standard, and recommendations for overcoming barriers. Ten training topics, for a quantity of 11 hours or more per topic, were identified in the quantitative phase and reinforced in the qualitative phase. In-person training was preferred for all but 3 topics, where online synchronous delivery was preferred. Other aspects of training were further explored, and the concept of a basic versus advanced training standard emerged as a major theme. Barriers to training included financial support and time to attend training as well as gaps in leadership knowledge and support. While training is key to improved healthcare emergency preparedness, variation in training exists. This study recommends a standard in healthcare emergency manager training.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Security
Health Security PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
6.10%
发文量
70
期刊介绍: Health Security is a peer-reviewed journal providing research and essential guidance for the protection of people’s health before and after epidemics or disasters and for ensuring that communities are resilient to major challenges. The Journal explores the issues posed by disease outbreaks and epidemics; natural disasters; biological, chemical, and nuclear accidents or deliberate threats; foodborne outbreaks; and other health emergencies. It offers important insight into how to develop the systems needed to meet these challenges. Taking an interdisciplinary approach, Health Security covers research, innovations, methods, challenges, and ethical and legal dilemmas facing scientific, military, and health organizations. The Journal is a key resource for practitioners in these fields, policymakers, scientific experts, and government officials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信