了解边缘型人格障碍的元认知和冲动问题的临床和认知洞察力-一项横断面研究。

Industrial Psychiatry Journal Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-18 DOI:10.4103/ipj.ipj_348_24
Rajnish Raj, Aaliya Khanam, Zaid A Wani, Afifa Afreen, Simranjeet Kour, Ajaz A Khan, Inaamul Haq
{"title":"了解边缘型人格障碍的元认知和冲动问题的临床和认知洞察力-一项横断面研究。","authors":"Rajnish Raj, Aaliya Khanam, Zaid A Wani, Afifa Afreen, Simranjeet Kour, Ajaz A Khan, Inaamul Haq","doi":"10.4103/ipj.ipj_348_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Borderline personality disorder (BLPD) is one of the most common personalities disorders frequently encountered in the outpatient setup.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>Understanding the role of impulsivity and metacognition in clinical and cognitive insight among BLPD patients.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was performed among 81 patients diagnosed with BLPD. Sociodemographic details were collected, and the Borderline Personality Questionnaire (BPQ), Beck Cognitive Insight Scale (BCIS), Metacognitive Questionnaire (MCQ-30), Urgency premeditation perseverance sensation seeking - impulsive behavior scale - short version (UPPS-S), and Scale to assess unawareness of mental disorder (SUMD) were applied to assess severity symptomatology, cognitive insight, metacognition, impulsivity and clinical insight, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age ± SD of subject was 22.19 ± 3.79, with a female preponderance (N = 61, 75.3%). The mean ± SD of BCIS, MCQ-30, UPPS-S, SUMD, and BPQ was 7.78 ± 4.11, 66.96 ± 14.95, 50.98 ± 11.72, 5.53 ± 2.36, and 57.56 ± 9.00, respectively. The cognitive (BCIS) and clinical insight (SUMD) were significantly correlated (r = -0.26, P = 0.01). The impulsivity (UPPS) was also positively correlated with BPQ, (r = 0.26, <i>P</i> = 0.01). In regression analysis, a significant negative relation was observed with MCQ-30 (Cognitive self-consciousness) (β = -0.341, 95% CI = -1.022 to - 0.186, <i>P</i> = 0.005) when predicting BPQ. A significant negative relation of Negative urgency with BCIS (β = -0.339, 95% CI = -0.703 to - 0.054, <i>P</i> = 0.023) and a positive relation with SUMD (β =0.331, 95% CI = 0.032 to 0.392, <i>P</i> = 0.022) were obtained.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this study can be used in clinical practice by strengthening existing therapies aiming at these areas and thereby enhancing therapeutic alliance, adherence, and prognosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":13534,"journal":{"name":"Industrial Psychiatry Journal","volume":"34 1","pages":"89-96"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12077633/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding the metacognition and impulsivity issues with clinical and cognitive insight in borderline personality disorder - A cross sectional study.\",\"authors\":\"Rajnish Raj, Aaliya Khanam, Zaid A Wani, Afifa Afreen, Simranjeet Kour, Ajaz A Khan, Inaamul Haq\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ipj.ipj_348_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Borderline personality disorder (BLPD) is one of the most common personalities disorders frequently encountered in the outpatient setup.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>Understanding the role of impulsivity and metacognition in clinical and cognitive insight among BLPD patients.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was performed among 81 patients diagnosed with BLPD. Sociodemographic details were collected, and the Borderline Personality Questionnaire (BPQ), Beck Cognitive Insight Scale (BCIS), Metacognitive Questionnaire (MCQ-30), Urgency premeditation perseverance sensation seeking - impulsive behavior scale - short version (UPPS-S), and Scale to assess unawareness of mental disorder (SUMD) were applied to assess severity symptomatology, cognitive insight, metacognition, impulsivity and clinical insight, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age ± SD of subject was 22.19 ± 3.79, with a female preponderance (N = 61, 75.3%). The mean ± SD of BCIS, MCQ-30, UPPS-S, SUMD, and BPQ was 7.78 ± 4.11, 66.96 ± 14.95, 50.98 ± 11.72, 5.53 ± 2.36, and 57.56 ± 9.00, respectively. The cognitive (BCIS) and clinical insight (SUMD) were significantly correlated (r = -0.26, P = 0.01). The impulsivity (UPPS) was also positively correlated with BPQ, (r = 0.26, <i>P</i> = 0.01). In regression analysis, a significant negative relation was observed with MCQ-30 (Cognitive self-consciousness) (β = -0.341, 95% CI = -1.022 to - 0.186, <i>P</i> = 0.005) when predicting BPQ. A significant negative relation of Negative urgency with BCIS (β = -0.339, 95% CI = -0.703 to - 0.054, <i>P</i> = 0.023) and a positive relation with SUMD (β =0.331, 95% CI = 0.032 to 0.392, <i>P</i> = 0.022) were obtained.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this study can be used in clinical practice by strengthening existing therapies aiming at these areas and thereby enhancing therapeutic alliance, adherence, and prognosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13534,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Industrial Psychiatry Journal\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"89-96\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12077633/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Industrial Psychiatry Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ipj.ipj_348_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Industrial Psychiatry Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ipj.ipj_348_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:边缘型人格障碍(BLPD)是门诊最常见的人格障碍之一。目的:了解冲动性和元认知在BLPD患者临床和认知洞察力中的作用。材料和方法:对81例诊断为BLPD的患者进行横断面研究。收集社会人口学资料,分别采用边缘性人格问卷(BPQ)、贝克认知洞察量表(BCIS)、元认知问卷(MCQ-30)、紧急预判坚持、感觉寻求-冲动行为简易量表(UPPS-S)和精神障碍无意识评定量表(SUMD)对患者的严重症状、认知洞察、元认知、冲动性和临床洞察进行评估。结果:患者平均年龄±SD为22.19±3.79,女性居多(N = 61, 75.3%)。BCIS、MCQ-30、UPPS-S、SUMD、BPQ的平均±SD分别为7.78±4.11、66.96±14.95、50.98±11.72、5.53±2.36、57.56±9.00。认知能力(BCIS)与临床洞察力(SUMD)显著相关(r = -0.26, P = 0.01)。冲动性(UPPS)与BPQ呈正相关(r = 0.26, P = 0.01)。在回归分析中,MCQ-30 (Cognitive self-consciousness,认知自我意识)对BPQ的预测呈显著负相关(β = -0.341, 95% CI = -1.022 ~ - 0.186, P = 0.005)。阴性急迫性与BCIS呈显著负相关(β = -0.339, 95% CI = -0.703 ~ - 0.054, P = 0.023),与SUMD呈正相关(β =0.331, 95% CI = 0.032 ~ 0.392, P = 0.022)。结论:本研究结果可用于临床实践,加强针对这些领域的现有治疗,从而提高治疗联盟性、依从性和预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Understanding the metacognition and impulsivity issues with clinical and cognitive insight in borderline personality disorder - A cross sectional study.

Background: Borderline personality disorder (BLPD) is one of the most common personalities disorders frequently encountered in the outpatient setup.

Aim: Understanding the role of impulsivity and metacognition in clinical and cognitive insight among BLPD patients.

Materials and methods: A cross-sectional study was performed among 81 patients diagnosed with BLPD. Sociodemographic details were collected, and the Borderline Personality Questionnaire (BPQ), Beck Cognitive Insight Scale (BCIS), Metacognitive Questionnaire (MCQ-30), Urgency premeditation perseverance sensation seeking - impulsive behavior scale - short version (UPPS-S), and Scale to assess unawareness of mental disorder (SUMD) were applied to assess severity symptomatology, cognitive insight, metacognition, impulsivity and clinical insight, respectively.

Results: The mean age ± SD of subject was 22.19 ± 3.79, with a female preponderance (N = 61, 75.3%). The mean ± SD of BCIS, MCQ-30, UPPS-S, SUMD, and BPQ was 7.78 ± 4.11, 66.96 ± 14.95, 50.98 ± 11.72, 5.53 ± 2.36, and 57.56 ± 9.00, respectively. The cognitive (BCIS) and clinical insight (SUMD) were significantly correlated (r = -0.26, P = 0.01). The impulsivity (UPPS) was also positively correlated with BPQ, (r = 0.26, P = 0.01). In regression analysis, a significant negative relation was observed with MCQ-30 (Cognitive self-consciousness) (β = -0.341, 95% CI = -1.022 to - 0.186, P = 0.005) when predicting BPQ. A significant negative relation of Negative urgency with BCIS (β = -0.339, 95% CI = -0.703 to - 0.054, P = 0.023) and a positive relation with SUMD (β =0.331, 95% CI = 0.032 to 0.392, P = 0.022) were obtained.

Conclusion: The results of this study can be used in clinical practice by strengthening existing therapies aiming at these areas and thereby enhancing therapeutic alliance, adherence, and prognosis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
39 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信