一个额外的复制起点导致细胞周期特异性DNA复制分叉速度。

IF 4 2区 生物学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY
Frontiers in Microbiology Pub Date : 2025-04-30 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fmicb.2025.1584664
Ole Skovgaard
{"title":"一个额外的复制起点导致细胞周期特异性DNA复制分叉速度。","authors":"Ole Skovgaard","doi":"10.3389/fmicb.2025.1584664","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Replication fork speed (RFS) in <i>Escherichia coli</i> has long been considered constant throughout the replication and cell cycles. In wild-type cells, the circular chromosome is duplicated bidirectionally from <i>oriC</i>, yielding two replication forks that converge at the ter region. Under slow-growth conditions, cells are smaller at initiation than at termination, so DNA replication consumes a larger fraction of cellular resources early in the cell cycle. To challenge this paradigm, we analyzed an <i>E. coli</i> strain with an additional ectopic copy of <i>oriC</i>-designated <i>oriX</i>-inserted midway along the left replichore. In this mutant, replication initiates simultaneously from both <i>oriC</i> and <i>oriX</i>, resulting in four active replication forks early in the cycle. Specifically, the rightward-moving fork from <i>oriX</i> and the leftward-moving fork from <i>oriC</i> converge first, while the leftward-moving fork from <i>oriX</i> is halted at the <i>terA</i> site until the arrival of the rightward-moving <i>oriC</i> fork. Consequently, the number of active replication forks varies dynamically-from zero to four, then two, then one, and finally zero-compared to the fixed zero-two-zero pattern observed in wild-type cells. RFS was calculated using marker frequency analysis of deep sequencing data. Our analysis revealed that RFS is reduced by approximately one third when four replication forks are active and increases by about one fourth when only one fork is active, resulting in a 2-fold variation in RFS during the replication cycle. Moreover, delaying replication initiation or increasing the available dNTP pool normalized these variations, indicating that nucleotide supply is the primary constraint on replication speed. These findings demonstrate that RFS is not inherently constant within a replication cycle and provide a basis for further studies into the factors that regulate replication kinetics.</p>","PeriodicalId":12466,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Microbiology","volume":"16 ","pages":"1584664"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12075136/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An additional replication origin causes cell cycle specific DNA replication fork speed.\",\"authors\":\"Ole Skovgaard\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fmicb.2025.1584664\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Replication fork speed (RFS) in <i>Escherichia coli</i> has long been considered constant throughout the replication and cell cycles. In wild-type cells, the circular chromosome is duplicated bidirectionally from <i>oriC</i>, yielding two replication forks that converge at the ter region. Under slow-growth conditions, cells are smaller at initiation than at termination, so DNA replication consumes a larger fraction of cellular resources early in the cell cycle. To challenge this paradigm, we analyzed an <i>E. coli</i> strain with an additional ectopic copy of <i>oriC</i>-designated <i>oriX</i>-inserted midway along the left replichore. In this mutant, replication initiates simultaneously from both <i>oriC</i> and <i>oriX</i>, resulting in four active replication forks early in the cycle. Specifically, the rightward-moving fork from <i>oriX</i> and the leftward-moving fork from <i>oriC</i> converge first, while the leftward-moving fork from <i>oriX</i> is halted at the <i>terA</i> site until the arrival of the rightward-moving <i>oriC</i> fork. Consequently, the number of active replication forks varies dynamically-from zero to four, then two, then one, and finally zero-compared to the fixed zero-two-zero pattern observed in wild-type cells. RFS was calculated using marker frequency analysis of deep sequencing data. Our analysis revealed that RFS is reduced by approximately one third when four replication forks are active and increases by about one fourth when only one fork is active, resulting in a 2-fold variation in RFS during the replication cycle. Moreover, delaying replication initiation or increasing the available dNTP pool normalized these variations, indicating that nucleotide supply is the primary constraint on replication speed. These findings demonstrate that RFS is not inherently constant within a replication cycle and provide a basis for further studies into the factors that regulate replication kinetics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12466,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Microbiology\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"1584664\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12075136/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Microbiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2025.1584664\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2025.1584664","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大肠杆菌的复制分叉速度(RFS)一直被认为在整个复制和细胞周期中是恒定的。在野生型细胞中,圆形染色体从oriC开始双向复制,产生两个在ter区域收敛的复制分叉。在缓慢生长的条件下,细胞在起始时比终止时更小,因此DNA复制在细胞周期早期消耗的细胞资源比例更大。为了挑战这种范式,我们分析了一种大肠杆菌菌株,该菌株的左复制体中间插入了一个额外的oric指定的orx异位拷贝。在这个突变体中,oriC和orx同时开始复制,在周期的早期产生了四个活跃的复制分叉。具体来说,来自oriX的向右移动的叉和来自oriC的向左移动的叉首先收敛,而来自oriX的向左移动的叉在terA位点停止,直到来自oriC的向右移动的叉到达。因此,与野生型细胞中观察到的固定的0 - 2 - 0模式相比,活跃复制分叉的数量动态变化——从0到4,然后是2,然后是1,最后是0。RFS采用深度测序数据的标记频率分析计算。我们的分析显示,当四个复制分叉处于活动状态时,RFS减少了大约三分之一,而当只有一个复制分叉处于活动状态时,RFS增加了大约四分之一,导致RFS在复制周期中变化了两倍。此外,延迟复制起始或增加可用的dNTP池使这些变化正常化,表明核苷酸供应是复制速度的主要限制。这些发现表明,RFS在一个复制周期内并不是固有不变的,并为进一步研究调节复制动力学的因素提供了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An additional replication origin causes cell cycle specific DNA replication fork speed.

Replication fork speed (RFS) in Escherichia coli has long been considered constant throughout the replication and cell cycles. In wild-type cells, the circular chromosome is duplicated bidirectionally from oriC, yielding two replication forks that converge at the ter region. Under slow-growth conditions, cells are smaller at initiation than at termination, so DNA replication consumes a larger fraction of cellular resources early in the cell cycle. To challenge this paradigm, we analyzed an E. coli strain with an additional ectopic copy of oriC-designated oriX-inserted midway along the left replichore. In this mutant, replication initiates simultaneously from both oriC and oriX, resulting in four active replication forks early in the cycle. Specifically, the rightward-moving fork from oriX and the leftward-moving fork from oriC converge first, while the leftward-moving fork from oriX is halted at the terA site until the arrival of the rightward-moving oriC fork. Consequently, the number of active replication forks varies dynamically-from zero to four, then two, then one, and finally zero-compared to the fixed zero-two-zero pattern observed in wild-type cells. RFS was calculated using marker frequency analysis of deep sequencing data. Our analysis revealed that RFS is reduced by approximately one third when four replication forks are active and increases by about one fourth when only one fork is active, resulting in a 2-fold variation in RFS during the replication cycle. Moreover, delaying replication initiation or increasing the available dNTP pool normalized these variations, indicating that nucleotide supply is the primary constraint on replication speed. These findings demonstrate that RFS is not inherently constant within a replication cycle and provide a basis for further studies into the factors that regulate replication kinetics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
9.60%
发文量
4837
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Microbiology is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research across the entire spectrum of microbiology. Field Chief Editor Martin G. Klotz at Washington State University is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信