{"title":"一个额外的复制起点导致细胞周期特异性DNA复制分叉速度。","authors":"Ole Skovgaard","doi":"10.3389/fmicb.2025.1584664","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Replication fork speed (RFS) in <i>Escherichia coli</i> has long been considered constant throughout the replication and cell cycles. In wild-type cells, the circular chromosome is duplicated bidirectionally from <i>oriC</i>, yielding two replication forks that converge at the ter region. Under slow-growth conditions, cells are smaller at initiation than at termination, so DNA replication consumes a larger fraction of cellular resources early in the cell cycle. To challenge this paradigm, we analyzed an <i>E. coli</i> strain with an additional ectopic copy of <i>oriC</i>-designated <i>oriX</i>-inserted midway along the left replichore. In this mutant, replication initiates simultaneously from both <i>oriC</i> and <i>oriX</i>, resulting in four active replication forks early in the cycle. Specifically, the rightward-moving fork from <i>oriX</i> and the leftward-moving fork from <i>oriC</i> converge first, while the leftward-moving fork from <i>oriX</i> is halted at the <i>terA</i> site until the arrival of the rightward-moving <i>oriC</i> fork. Consequently, the number of active replication forks varies dynamically-from zero to four, then two, then one, and finally zero-compared to the fixed zero-two-zero pattern observed in wild-type cells. RFS was calculated using marker frequency analysis of deep sequencing data. Our analysis revealed that RFS is reduced by approximately one third when four replication forks are active and increases by about one fourth when only one fork is active, resulting in a 2-fold variation in RFS during the replication cycle. Moreover, delaying replication initiation or increasing the available dNTP pool normalized these variations, indicating that nucleotide supply is the primary constraint on replication speed. These findings demonstrate that RFS is not inherently constant within a replication cycle and provide a basis for further studies into the factors that regulate replication kinetics.</p>","PeriodicalId":12466,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Microbiology","volume":"16 ","pages":"1584664"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12075136/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An additional replication origin causes cell cycle specific DNA replication fork speed.\",\"authors\":\"Ole Skovgaard\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fmicb.2025.1584664\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Replication fork speed (RFS) in <i>Escherichia coli</i> has long been considered constant throughout the replication and cell cycles. In wild-type cells, the circular chromosome is duplicated bidirectionally from <i>oriC</i>, yielding two replication forks that converge at the ter region. Under slow-growth conditions, cells are smaller at initiation than at termination, so DNA replication consumes a larger fraction of cellular resources early in the cell cycle. To challenge this paradigm, we analyzed an <i>E. coli</i> strain with an additional ectopic copy of <i>oriC</i>-designated <i>oriX</i>-inserted midway along the left replichore. In this mutant, replication initiates simultaneously from both <i>oriC</i> and <i>oriX</i>, resulting in four active replication forks early in the cycle. Specifically, the rightward-moving fork from <i>oriX</i> and the leftward-moving fork from <i>oriC</i> converge first, while the leftward-moving fork from <i>oriX</i> is halted at the <i>terA</i> site until the arrival of the rightward-moving <i>oriC</i> fork. Consequently, the number of active replication forks varies dynamically-from zero to four, then two, then one, and finally zero-compared to the fixed zero-two-zero pattern observed in wild-type cells. RFS was calculated using marker frequency analysis of deep sequencing data. Our analysis revealed that RFS is reduced by approximately one third when four replication forks are active and increases by about one fourth when only one fork is active, resulting in a 2-fold variation in RFS during the replication cycle. Moreover, delaying replication initiation or increasing the available dNTP pool normalized these variations, indicating that nucleotide supply is the primary constraint on replication speed. These findings demonstrate that RFS is not inherently constant within a replication cycle and provide a basis for further studies into the factors that regulate replication kinetics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12466,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Microbiology\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"1584664\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12075136/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Microbiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2025.1584664\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2025.1584664","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
An additional replication origin causes cell cycle specific DNA replication fork speed.
Replication fork speed (RFS) in Escherichia coli has long been considered constant throughout the replication and cell cycles. In wild-type cells, the circular chromosome is duplicated bidirectionally from oriC, yielding two replication forks that converge at the ter region. Under slow-growth conditions, cells are smaller at initiation than at termination, so DNA replication consumes a larger fraction of cellular resources early in the cell cycle. To challenge this paradigm, we analyzed an E. coli strain with an additional ectopic copy of oriC-designated oriX-inserted midway along the left replichore. In this mutant, replication initiates simultaneously from both oriC and oriX, resulting in four active replication forks early in the cycle. Specifically, the rightward-moving fork from oriX and the leftward-moving fork from oriC converge first, while the leftward-moving fork from oriX is halted at the terA site until the arrival of the rightward-moving oriC fork. Consequently, the number of active replication forks varies dynamically-from zero to four, then two, then one, and finally zero-compared to the fixed zero-two-zero pattern observed in wild-type cells. RFS was calculated using marker frequency analysis of deep sequencing data. Our analysis revealed that RFS is reduced by approximately one third when four replication forks are active and increases by about one fourth when only one fork is active, resulting in a 2-fold variation in RFS during the replication cycle. Moreover, delaying replication initiation or increasing the available dNTP pool normalized these variations, indicating that nucleotide supply is the primary constraint on replication speed. These findings demonstrate that RFS is not inherently constant within a replication cycle and provide a basis for further studies into the factors that regulate replication kinetics.
期刊介绍:
Frontiers in Microbiology is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research across the entire spectrum of microbiology. Field Chief Editor Martin G. Klotz at Washington State University is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.